“Collaboration” is a ubiquitously championed concept and widely recognized across the public and private sectors as the foundation on which the capacity for addressing complex issues is predicated. For those invested in organizational improvement, high-quality collaboration has become no less than an imperative. However, evaluators and program stakeholders often struggle to assess the quality of collaborative dynamics and the merits of collaborative structures. In this article, the authors describe an approach to demystifying and assessing interpersonal collaboration and use their consultancy work with school improvement stakeholders to illustrate a multistage collaboration evaluation process. Evaluators in a wide range of organizational settings are encouraged to utilize collaboration theory and the evaluation strategies presented herein to cultivate stakeholder capacity to understand, examine, and capitalize on the power of collaboration.
Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (2003). Collaborative public management: New strategies for local governments. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
2.
American Federation of Teachers. (2004). Professional development for teachers. Retrieved November 15, 2004, from http://www.aft.org/topics/teacher-quality/prodev.htm
3.
Argryis, C., & Schon, D. A. (1996). Organizational learning II: Theory, method, and practice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
4.
Attwood, M., Pedler, M., Pritchard, S., & Wilkinson, D. (2003). Leading change: A guide to whole systems thinking. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
5.
Austin, J. (2000). The collaboration challenge: How non-profits and businesses succeed through strategic alliances. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6.
Bailey, D., & Koney, K. (2000). Strategic alliances among health and human services organizations: From affiliations to consolidations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7.
Barth, R. S. (1990). Improving schools from within: Teachers, parents and principals can make a difference. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
8.
Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1995). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. In M. D. Cohen & L. S. Sproull (Eds.), Organizational Learning (pp. 58-82). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9.
Collins, J. (2001). Good to great: Why some companies make the leap... and others don’t. New York: Harper Business.
10.
Dryfoos, J. (1990). Adolescents at risk: Prevalence and prevention. New York: Oxford University Press.
11.
Dufour, R. (2005). What is a professional learning community? In R. Dufour, R. Eaker, & R. DuFour (Eds.), On common ground: The power of professional learning communities (pp. 31-43). Bloomington, IN: National Education Service.
12.
Dufour, R., Eaker, R., & Dufour, R. (2005). On common ground: The power of professional learning communities. Bloomington, IN: National Education Service.
13.
Eason-Watkins, B. (2005). Implementing PLCs in the Chicago public schools. In R. Dufour, R. Eaker, & R. DuFour (Eds.), On common ground: The power of professional learning communities (pp. 193-207). Bloomington, IN: National Education Service.
14.
Elliott, D., Hamburg, B., & Williams, K. (1998). Violence in American schools. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
15.
Fetterman, D. M. (2001). Empowerment evaluation: Building communities of practice and a culture of learning. American Journal of Community Psychology, 30, 89-103.
16.
Frey, B., Lohmeier, J., Lee, S., & Tollefson, N. (2006). Measuring collaboration among grant partners. American Journal of Evaluation, 27, 383-392.
17.
Gajda, R. (2004). Utilizing collaboration theory to evaluate strategic alliances. American Journal of Evaluation, 25, 65-77.
18.
Gajda, R. (2006). Safe schools and strategic alliances: How assessment of collaboration enhances school violence prevention and response. Journal of School Violence, 5, 63-80.
19.
Goodlad, J., Mantle-Bromley, C., & Goodlad, S. J. (2004). Education for everyone: Agenda for education in a democracy. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
20.
Hesselbein, F., & Whitehead, J. (2000). Foreword. In Austin, J., The collaboration challenge: How non-profits and businesses succeed through strategic alliances. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
21.
Hogue, T. (1993). Community based collaboration: Community wellness multiplied. Oregon State University: Oregon Center for Community Leadership. Retrieved January 24, 2001, from http://crs.uvm.edu/nnco/collab/wellness.html
22.
Hord, S. (2004). Learning together, leading together: Changing schools through professional learning communities. New York: Teachers College Press.
23.
Hord, S., & Roy, P. (2003). Moving “NSDC’s” staff development standards into practice: Innovation configurations. Oxford, OH: NSDC.
24.
Jackson, A. W., & Davis, G. A. (2000). Turning points 2000: Educating adolescents in the 21st century. New York: Teachers College Press.
25.
Koliba, C., & Gajda, R. (2006). Mapping the communities of practice of state agency workers. Paper presented at the American Evaluation Association Annual Conference, Portland, OR.
26.
Koliba, C., & Lathrop, J. (in press). Inquiry as intervention: Employing action research to support an organization’s capacity to learn. Administration & Society.
27.
Korton, D. C. (2001). The management of social transformation. In C. Stivers (Vol. Ed.), Democracy, bureaucracy, and the study of administration (pp. 476-497). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
28.
Little, J. W. (1987). Teachers as colleagues. In V. Richardson-Koehler (Ed.), Educators Handbook. White Plans, NY: Longman.
29.
Little, J. W. (1990). The persistence of privacy: Autonomy and initiative in teachers’ professional relations. Teachers’ College Record, 91, 509-536.
30.
Louis, K. S., & Kruse, S. D. (1995). Professionalism and communities: Perspectives on reforming urban schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
31.
McNiff, J. (1992). Action research: Principles and practice. London: Routledge.
32.
Milward, H. B., & Provan, K. C. (1998). Principles for controlling agents: the political economy of network structure. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8, 203-222.
33.
National Association of Elementary School Principals. (2002). Leading learning communities: Standards for what principals should know and be able to do. Alexandria, VA: Author.
34.
National Association of Secondary School Principals. (2004). Breaking ranks II: Strategies for leading high school reform. Reston, VA: Author.
35.
National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. (2004). What teachers should know and be able to do: The five core propositions. Retrieved December 2, 2005, from http://www.nbpts.org/about/coreprops.cfm%23prop5
36.
National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future. (2003). No dream denied: A pledge to America’s children. Summary report. Washington, DC: Author.
37.
National School Reform Faculty Web site. (2005). Retrieved December 2, 2005, from http://www.nsrfharmony.org/
38.
National Staff Development Council. (2005). Standards for staff development. Retrieved December 2, 2005, from http://www.nsdc.org/standards/index.cfm
39.
O’Donnell, D., Porter, G., McGuire, D., Garavan, T. N., Heffernan, M., & Cleary, P. (2003). Creating intellectual capital: A Habermasian community of practice (Cop) introduction. Journal of European Industrial Training, 27(2/3/4), 80-87.
40.
Park, P., Brydon-Miller, M., Hall, B., & Jackson, T. (Eds). (1993). Voices of change: Participatory research in the United States and Canada. Toronto, Canada: OISE Press.
41.
Patton, M. (1997). Utilization-focused evaluation: The new century text (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
42.
Peters, T. (1987). Thriving on chaos. New York: Knopf.
43.
Peters, T., & Waterman, R. (1982). In search of excellence: Lessons from America’s best-run companies. New York: Harper & Row.
44.
Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R. (2000). The knowing-doing gap: How smart companies turn knowledge into action. Boston: Harvard Business Press.
45.
Preece, J. (2004). Etiquette, empathy and trust in communities of practice: Stepping stones to social capital. Journal of Universal Computing Science, 10(3), 63-77.
46.
Reeves, D. (2006, May). Of hubs, bridges, and networks. Educational Leadership, 63(8), 32-37.
47.
Sapsford, R. (1999). Survey research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
48.
Schmoker, M. (2005). No turning back: The ironclad case for professional learning communities. In R. Dufour, R. Eaker, & R. DuFour (Eds.), On common ground: The power of professional learning communities (pp. 135-153). Bloomington, IN: National Education Service.
49.
Scribner, J., Sunday Cockrell, K., Cockrell, D., & Valentine, J. (1999). Creating professional communities in schools through organizational learning: An evaluation of a school improvement process. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35, 130-160.
50.
Senge, P., Ross, R., Smith, B., Roberts, C., & Kleiner, A. (1994). The fifth discipline fieldbook: Strategies and tools for building a learning organization. New York: Doubleday.
51.
Senge, P. M. (1999). Leadership in living organizations. In Leading beyond the walls (pp. 1-11). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
52.
Sergiovanni, T. J. (1994). Building community in schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
53.
Sparks, D. (2005). Leading for transformation in teaching, learning, and relationships. In R. Dufour, R. Eaker, & R. DuFour (Eds.), On common ground: The power of professional learning communities (pp. 155-175). Bloomington, IN: National Education Service.
54.
Tuckman, B., & Jensen, M. (1977). Stages of small group development revisited. Group and Organizational Studies, 2, 419-427.
55.
Vermont Higher Education Collaborative. (2006). For education workforce development. Building a comprehensive system of education personnel recruitment, preparation, development, and retention. Montpelier, VT: Author.
56.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
57.
Whyte, W. F. (Ed.). (1991). Participatory action research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
58.
Yankelovich, D. (1999). The magic of dialogue: Transforming conflict into cooperation. New York: Simon & Schuster.
