The Evaluator-Observer Comes to the Table: A Moment of Consequential Decision Making

American Evaluation Association . (2004). Guiding principles for evaluators (2nd ed.). Fairhaven, CT: Author.

Comptroller General of the United States . (2002). Government auditing standards: Answers to independence standard questions (GAO-02-870G). Washington, DC: U.S. General Accounting Office.

Comptroller General of the United States . (2003). Government auditing standards, 2003 revision (GAO-03-673G). Washington, DC: U.S. General Accounting Office.

Guba, E. G. , & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Hendricks, M. (1993). The evaluator as “personal coach”. Evaluation Practice, 14, 49-55.

Kirkhart, K. E. (2000). Reconceptualizing evaluation use: An integrated theory of influence. In V. J. Caracelli & H. Preskill (Eds.), The expanding scope of evaluation use (New directions for evaluation, Vol. 88, pp. 5-23). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Newman, D. L. , & Brown, R. D. (1996). Applied ethics for program evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Patton, M. Q. (1997). Utilization-focused evaluation: The new century text (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Rallis, S. , & Rossman, G. (2000). Dialogue for learning: Evaluator as critical friend. In R. K. Hopson (Ed.). How and why language matters in evaluation (New directions for evaluation, Vol. 86, pp. 81-92). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Symonette, H. (2005, June). Keeping our eyes on the prize: Cultivating self-as-responsive instrument for excellence in evaluation. Paper presented at Howard University Evaluation Training Institute, Washington, DC.