Should young people participate in community evaluation research and, if so, what roles should they play? We believe that youth participation is desirable, but that it remains relatively undeveloped as a field of practice or subject of study. For this reason, this paper provides perspective on the increasing involvement by young people, identifies the participation patterns and evaluation roles of young people, and draws conclusions from empirically-based practice. It draws on the available literature, including our own participatory evaluation of a project intended to increase youth participation in organizational development and community change.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alvarado-Mena, J., et al. (1999). Locked out: Exposing the suspension epidemic in the Oakland Public Schools. Oakland: Kids First Coalition.
2.
Ansley, F., & Gaventa, J. (1997). Researching for democracy and democratizing research. Change, 29, 46-53.
3.
Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35, 216-224.
4.
Campbell, P., Edgar, S., & Halsted, A. L. (1994, October). Students as evaluators: A model for program evaluation. Phi Delta Kappan, pp. 160-165.
5.
Checkoway, B. (1998). Involving young people in neighborhood development. Children and Youth Services Review, 20, 765-795.
6.
Checkoway, B., & Richards-Schuster, K. (1999). User’s guide to participatory evaluation for Lifting New Voices. Ann Arbor: Lifting New Voices, School of Social Work, University of Michigan.
7.
Checkoway, B., & Richards-Schuster, K. (2001a). Second year evaluation of Lifting New Voices. Ann Arbor: Lifting New Voices, School of Social Work, University of Michigan.
8.
Checkoway, B., & Richards-Schuster, K. (2001b). Lifting New Voices for socially just communities. Community Youth Development, 2, 32-37.
9.
Ferguson, A. (2000). Bad boys: Public schools in the making of black masculinity. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
10.
Fetterman, D., Kaftarian, S., & Wandersman, A. (Eds.). (1996). Empowerment evaluation: Knowledge and tools for self-assessment and accountability. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
11.
Figueroa, L., et al. (2000). In between the lines: How the New York Times frames youth. New York: New York City Youth Media Watch.
12.
Finn, J. L. (2001). Text and turbulence: Representing adolescence as pathology in the human services. Childhood, 8, 167-192.
13.
Finn, J. L., & Checkoway, B. (1998). Young people as competent community builders: A challenge to social work. Social Work, 43, 335-345.
14.
Fountain, S. (1995). It’s only right! A practical guide to learning about the convention on the rights of the child. New York: Education for Development Section, UNICEF.
15.
Freudenberg, N., Roberts, L., Richie, B., & Taylor, R. (1999). Coming up in the boogie down: The role of violence in the lives of adolescents in the South Bronx. Health Education & Behavior, 26, 788-805.
16.
Gaventa, J. (1993). The powerful, the powerless, and the experts. In P. Park, et al. (Eds.), Voices of change: Participatory research in the United States and Canada. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Education.
17.
Greene, J. C. (2000). Challenges in practicing deliberative democratic evaluation. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 85, 13-26.
18.
Greenwood, D. J., & Levin, M. (1998). Introduction to action research: Social research for social change. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
19.
Guidinger, K., & Linnane, P. (1996). Youth evaluators project: A report of first year activities, September 1995-July 1996. Milwaukee: Planning Council for Health and Human Services.
20.
Hart, R. (1997). Children’s participation: The theory and practice of involving young citizens in community development and environmental care. London: Earthscan.
21.
House, E. R., & Howe, K. R. (2000). Deliberative democratic evaluation dialogue. In K. E. Ryan & L. Destefano (Eds.), Evaluation as democratic process: Promoting inclusion, dialogue, and deliberation. New Directions for Evaluation (Vol. 85, pp. 3-12). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
22.
Israel, B. A., Schulz, A., Parker, E., & Becker, A. (1998). Review of community-based research: Assessing partnership approaches to improving public health. Annual Review of Public Health, 19, 173-202.
23.
Johnson, V., Ivan-Smith, E., Gordon, G., Pridmore, P., & Scott, P. (1998). Stepping forward: Children and young people’s participation. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.
24.
Lesko, W. (1992). No kidding around! America’s young activists are changing our world and you can, too!Kensington: Activism 2000.
25.
Lewis, B. (1998). The kid’s guide to social action: How to solve the social problems you choose and turn creative thinking into positive change. Minneapolis: Free Spirit Press.
26.
McIntyre, A. (2000). Inner-city kids: Adolescents confront life and violence in an urban community. New York: New York University Press.
27.
McLaughlin, M. W., Irby, M. A., & Langman, J. (1994). Urban sanctuaries: Neighborhood organizations in the lives and futures of inner-city youth. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
28.
Metis Associates, Inc. (1996). Chatam-Savannah Youth Futures Authority evaluation. Documents and instruments. New York: Metis Association, Inc.
29.
Moses, R. P. (2001). Radical equations: Math literacy and civil rights. Boston: Beacon Press.
30.
Mullahey, R., Susskind, Y., & Checkoway, B. (1999). Youth participation in community planning. Chicago: American Planning Association.
31.
Nyden, P., Figert, A., Shibley, M., & Burrows, D. (1997). Building community: Social science in action. Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge Press.
32.
Parlett, M., & Hamilton, D. (1976). Evaluation as illumination: A new approach to the study of program evaluation. In G. Glass (Ed.), Evaluation studies review annual (Vol. 1, pp. 140-157). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
33.
Patton, M. Q. (1997). Utilization-focused evaluation: The new century text. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
34.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
35.
Rajani, R. (2000). The case for youth participation. n.p.
36.
Sandercock, L. (1998). Towards cosmopolis. New York: Wiley.
37.
Schensul, J. J., et al. (1997). The National Teen Action Research Center. Hartford: Institute for Community Research.
38.
Schwandt, T. A. (2001a). A postscript on thinking about dialogue. Evaluation, 7, 264-276.
39.
Schwandt, T. A. (2001b). Responsiveness and everyday life. In J. C. Greene & A. Aloma (Eds.), Responsive evaluation. New directions for evaluation (Vol. 92, pp. 73-88). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
40.
Stake, R. E. (1975). Evaluating the arts in education: A responsive approach. Columbus: Charles E. Merrill.
41.
Wang, C., & Burris, M. A. (1997). Photovoice: Concept, methodology, and use for participatory needs assessment. Health Education and Behavior, 24, 369-387.
42.
Weiss, H. (1999). New strategies in foundation grantmaking for children and youth. Evaluation Exchange, 5, 9-10.
43.
Winn, E., Morado, C., & West, H. (1992). Resource manual for SEED. Ann Arbor: Students Educating Each Other About Discrimination.
44.
Y-MAC. (1997). An evaluation of San Francisco’s youth centers. San Francisco: Y-MAC.
45.
Youniss, J., & Yates, M. (1997). Community service and social responsibility in Youth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
46.
Zeldin, S., McDaniel, A., Topitzes, D., & Calvert, M. (2000). Youth in decision making: A study on the impacts of youth on adults and organizations. Washington, DC: National 4H Council.
47.
Zimmerman, K., & Erbstein, N. (1999). Youth empowerment evaluation. Evaluation Exchange, 5, 4.
