International Students’ Reflections on the Cultural Embeddedness of Evaluation Theory

Abstract

Locally adapted and culturally sensitive evaluation approaches are needed throughout the world. International students studying evaluation theory in the U.S. must both understand evaluation theory itself, and have a good grasp of the U.S. context in which it was developed and intended for use. They must then attempt to translate the theory into their own contexts, adjusting for differences in culture and socio-political realities, and assess its possible utility in their own evaluation work back home. This task is challenging; often, international students are inadequately prepared for it. In this article, both international and U.S. students reflect on the cultural, communication, and instructional difficulties of this process.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bamberger, M. (2000). The evaluation of international development programs: A view from the front. American Journal of Evaluation, 21, 95-102.

[Review of journal issue and book]. American Journal of Evaluation, 22, 117-122.

Ginsberg, P. E. (1988). Evaluation in cross-cultural perspective. Evaluation and Program Planning, 11, 189-195.

Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation . (1994). The program evaluation standards (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Patton, M. Q. (Ed.). (1985). Culture and Evaluation. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 25. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Boss.

Russon, C. (Ed.). (2000). The program evaluation standards in international settings. Occasional Paper Series, No. 17. Kalamazoo, MI: Western Michigan University Evaluation Center.

Russon, C. , & Russon, K. (Eds.). (2000). The annotated bibliography of international program evaluation. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

Scheffler, A. (1997). Let sleeping dogs lie and other proverbs from around the world. Hauppauge, NY: Barron’s.

Shadish, W. R., Jr. , Cook, T. D. , & Leviton, L. C. (1991). Foundations of program evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

10.

Smith, N. L. (1991). The context of investigations in cross-cultural evaluations. Studies in Educational Education, 17, 3-21.

11.

Smith, N. L. , Chamberlain, A. , Jang, S. , Morgan, J. , & Villalba, C. (1999, April). Cultural influences on emergent evaluation designs. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

12.

Smith, N. L. , & Jang, S. (2002). Increasing cultural sensitivity in evaluation practice: A South Korean illustration. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 28, 61-69.

13.

Yoshihama, M. (2001). Immigrants-in-context framework: Understanding the interactive influence of socio-cultural contexts. Evaluation and Program Planning, 24, 307-318.