Cook, T. D., & Reichardt, C. S. (Eds.). (1979). Qualitative and quantitative methods in evaluation research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
2.
Fetterman, D. M. (1994). Empowerment evaluation. Evaluation Practice, 15,1-15.
3.
Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J., & Graham, W. E. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11, 255-274.
4.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5.
Herbert, W. (1995). The PC assault on science: Are even math and physics part of a racist, sexist, capitalist plot?U.S. News & World Report, February 20, 64-65.
6.
Howe, K. R. (1988). Against the quantitative-qualitative incompatibility thesis, or dogmas die hard. Educational Researcher, 17,10-16.
7.
Kidder, L. H., & Fine, M. (1987). Qualitative and quantitative methods: When stories converge. In M. M. Mark & R. L. Shotland (Eds.), Multiple methods in program evaluation. New Directions for Program Evaluation, Number 35 (pp. 57-75). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
8.
Lincoln, Y. S. (1991). The arts and sciences of program evaluation. Evaluation Practice, 12,1-8.
9.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1992). In response to Lee Sechrest’s 1991 AEA presidential address: Roots: Back to our first generation. Evaluation Practice, 13, 165-170.
10.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1994). RSVP: We are pleased to accept your invitation. Evaluation Practice, 13, 179-192.
11.
Madey, D. L. (1982). Some benefits of integrating qualitative and quantitative methods in program evaluation, with illustrations. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 4, 223-236.
12.
McKinley, W. (1998). Commentary: Mitroff’s ethical management: The colonization of truth. Journal of Management Inquiry, 7 (1), 80-85.
13.
Mertens, D. M. (1995). Identifying and respecting differences among participants in evaluation studies. In W. R. Shadish, D. L. Newman, M. A. Scheirer, & C. Wye (Eds.), Guiding principles for evaluations. New Directions for Program Evaluation, Number 66 (pp. 91-98). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
14.
Mertens, D. M. (1999). Inclusive evaluation: Implications of transformative theory for evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 20,1-14.
15.
Mitroff, I. I. (1998). On the fundamental importance of ethical management: Why management is the most important of all human activities. Journal of Management Inquiry, 7 (1), 68-79.
16.
Patton, M. Q. (1994). Developmental evaluation. Evaluation Practice, 15, 311-319.
17.
Rappaport, J. (1987). Terms of empowerment/exemplars of prevention: Toward a theory for community psychology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 15 (2), 121-148.
18.
Sechrest, L. (1992). Roots: Back to our first generation. Evaluation Practice, 13,1-7.
19.
Sechrest, L., Babcock, J., & Smith, S. (1993). An invitation to methodological pluralism. Evaluation Practice, 14, 227-235.
20.
Smith, M. L. (1986). The whole is greater: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches in evaluation studies. In D. D. Williams (Ed.), Naturalistic evaluation. New Directions for Program Evaluation, Number 30 (pp. 37-54). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
21.
Stufflebeam, D. L. (1994). Empowerment evaluation, objectivist evaluation, and evaluation standards: Where the future of evaluation should not go and where it needs to go. Evaluation Practice, 15, 321-338.
22.
Worthen, B. R. (1981). Journal entries of an eclectic evaluator. In R. S. Brandt (Ed.), Applied strategies for curriculum evaluation (pp. 58-90). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
23.
Worthen, B. R. (1999a). Critical challenges confronting certification of evaluators. American Journal of Evaluation, 20, 533-555.
24.
Worthen, B. R. (1999b). Critical challenges that confront the evaluation enterprise. Evaluation Journal of Australasia, 11 (2), 16-35.
25.
Worthen, B. R. (in press). How can we call evaluation a profession if there are no qualifications for practice? In D. L. Stufflebeam, T. Kellaghan, & L. Wingate (Eds.). International handbook of educational evaluation. Boston, MA: Kluwer.
26.
Worthen, B. R., Jones, S. C., & Goodrick, D. (1998) What are we really learning—and not learning—from our evaluation journals? Presented at the 19th Annual Conference of the Canadian Evaluation Society, St. Johns, Newfoundland.
27.
Worthen, B. R., Sanders, J. R., & Fitzpatrick, J. L. (1997). Program evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Addison Wesley Longman.