Student-run communications agencies on university campuses provide the opportunity for communications students to apply classroom learning to real client projects with actual budgets. Students have direct contact with marketing and communication professionals who hold the students accountable for their work and results. This research looks at the level of understanding and perceived value of these student-run agencies among hiring decision makers at professional communications firms. The research shows these decision makers value the experience students gain from this kind of agency work, including understanding agency operations and culture, interacting with clients, producing actual creative work, and being held accountable for results. Further, students experience the challenges associated with driving projects from start to completion while working with people of different backgrounds and skill sets. Overall, student agency experience provides students with valuable professional skills and a meaningful point of difference versus other candidates when competing for jobs.
BeachboardM. R.WeidmanL. M. (2013).
Client-centered skill sets: What small IMC agencies need from college graduates.Journal of Advertising Education,
17(2), 28–38.
2.
BuschA. M. (2013).
A professional project surveying student-run advertising and public relations agencies at institutions with ACEJMC accredited programs. Thesis and professional projects from the College of Journalism and Mass Communications, Paper,
35, 1–75. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1040&context=journalismdiss
3.
BushL. (2009).
Student public relations agencies: A qualitative study of the pedagogical benefits, risks, and a framework for success.Journalism & Mass Communication Educator,
64(1), 27–38.
4.
BushL.HaygoodD.VincentH. (2017).
Student-run communications agencies: Providing students with real-world experiences that impact their careers.Journalism & Mass Communication Educator,
72(4), 410–424. First published date: October-04-2016
5.
BushL.MillerB. M. (2011).
U.S. student-run agencies: Organization, attributes and adviser perceptions of student learning outcomes.Public Relations Review,
37(5), 485–491.
6.
GlaserB. G.StraussA. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research.
Chicago, IL:
Aldine Publishing Company.
7.
HaleyE.TaylorR.MorrisonM. (2014).
How advertising creatives define excellent planning.Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising,
35(2), 167–189.
8.
HaleyJ.RitschM.SmithJ. (2016).
The best of both worlds: Student perspectives on student-run advertising and public relations agencies. Journal of Public Relations Education,
2(1), 19–33.
9.
HannamB.SturgillA.FurnasK.VincentH. (2017). Learning to lead: Factors in leadership development for communications students in co-curricular organizations. Presented at the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication annual meeting in Chicago, IL.
10.
HanneyR. (2005).
Competence or capability: Work-based learning and problem-based learning.Journal of Media Practice,
6(2), 105–112.
11.
Hart Research Associates. (2015). Falling short? College learning and career success: Selected findings from online surveys of employers and college students conducted on behalf of the association of American colleges and universities. Retrieved from https://www.aacu.org/leap/public-opinion-research/2015-survey-results
12.
KimC. (2015).
Pedagogical approaches to student-run PR firms using service learning: A case study. Teaching Journalism and Mass Communication,
5(1), 57–68. Retrieved from http://www.aejmc.us/spig/journal
McCrackenG. (1988). The long interview.
Newbury Park, CA:
Sage.
15.
MorrisonM. A.HaleyE. E.SheehanK. B.TaylorR. E. (2002). Qualitative research in advertising: Strategies, techniques, and applications.
Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage.
16.
Patton, M. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
17.
ParkerJ.AngL.KoslowS. (2018).
The creative search for an insight in account planning: An absorptive capacity approach.Journal of Advertising,
47(3), 237–254.
18.
QuintanillaK. M.WahlS. T. (2005).
Incorporating service learning into communication courses: Benefits, guidelines and challenges. Texas Speech Communication Journal,
30(1), 67–97.
19.
RantaJ.DavisD. (2017). Student self-efficacy and student agencies. Presentation to the International Public Relations Research Conference, Orlando, FL.
20.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.).
Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage.
21.
SwansonD. J. (2011).
The student-run public relations firm in an undergraduate program: Reaching learning and professional development goals through ‘real-world’ experience.Public Relations Review,
37(5), 499–505.
22.
SwansonD. J. (2017). Real-world career preparation: A guide to creating a university student-run communications agency.
New York, NY:
Peter Lang Publishing.
23.
TaylorR. E.HoyM. G.HaleyE. (1996).
How French advertising professionals develop creative strategy.Journal of Advertising,
25(1), 1–14.
24.
WindelsK.MalliaK. L.BroylesS. J. (2013).
Soft skills: The difference between leading and leaving the advertising industry.Journal of Advertising Education,
17(2), 17–27.
