Men faculty scientists engage in academic entrepreneurship at higher rates than women, yet few studies examine how masculinity shapes this disparity. This article conceptualizes inventor masculinity to explain how cultural practices and institutional processes reinforce academic entrepreneurship as masculine. Drawing on five years of fieldwork and 60 interviews in an academic research center and traineeship program, I show how academic faculty scientists perform inventor masculinity through cultural practices like competition, technical dominance, and sexist humor. While inventor faculty often separate social and technical domains, some strategically bridge the social and technical in service of market competition. These practices are reproduced through mentorship and training. Institutional processes like recruitment reward masculine practices while devaluing women and feminine practices. Through my investigation, this article reveals how cultural practices and institutional processes reinforce academic entrepreneurship as masculine, shaping who is included, what kinds of work are recognized, and how scientific success is valued.
AdamsonMaria. 2014. “Reflexivity and the Construction of Competing Discourses of Masculinity in a Female-Dominated Profession.” Gender, Work & Organization21 (6): 559–572.
4.
AlegriaSharlaBanerjeePallavi. 2024. “Time Won’t Give Me Time.” Social Problemsspae047: 1–15.
5.
AzouleyPierreTobyStuartLuiChristopher C.. 2017. “Social Influence Given (Partially) Deliberate Matching.” American Journal of Sociology122 (4): 1223–71.
6.
Bar-ZivSharonFischman-AforiOritMiriamMarcowitz-Bitton. 2021. “Where the Gender Gap Meets Academic Patenting.” The Ohio State Technology Law Journal18: 239–300.
7.
BemillerMichelleSchneiderRachel Zimmer. 2021. “It’s Not Just a Joke.” Sociological Spectrum30 (4): 459–479.
8.
BengtssonTea Torbenfeldt. 2016. “Performing Hypermasculinity.” Men and Masculinities19 (4): 410–428.
9.
BerdahlJenniferCooperMarianneGlickPeterLivingstonRobertWilliamsJoan. 2018. “Work as Masculinity Contest.” Journal of Social Issues74 (3): 422–448.
10.
BermanElizabeth Popp. 2012. Creating the Market University. Princeton University Press.
11.
BranchEnobong H.2016. Pathways, Potholes, and the Persistence of Women in Science. Routledge.
12.
BrickellChris. 2003. “Performativity or Performance?” New Zealand Sociology18 (2): 158–178.
13.
BridgesTristan. 2010. “Men Just Weren’t Made to Do This.” Gender & Society24 (1): 5–30.
BridgesTristanPascoeC. J.. 2018. “On the Elasticity of Gender Hegemony.” In Gender Reckonings, edited by MesserschmidtJ. W.MessnerM. A.ConnellR.MartinP. Y., 254–274. New York University Press.
CarterDeborah FayeRazoDueñas Juanita E.RocíoMendoza. 2019. “Critical Examination of the Role of STEM in Propagating and Maintaining Race and Gender Disparities.” Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research34 (1): 39–97.
19.
CechErin. 2015. “Engineers and Engineeresses?” Sociological Perspectives58 (1): 56–77.
20.
CechErin. 2022. “The Intersectional Privilege of White Able-Bodied Heterosexual Men in STEM.” Science Advances8 (24): 1–14.
21.
ChowTiffany Yu. 2024. “Doing Gender, Undoing Race: Token Processes for Women with Multiple Subordinate Identities.” Gender & Society38 (4): 586–617.
22.
CianHeidiDouRemy. 2024. “Masculinized Discourses of STEM Interest, Performance, and Competence That Shape University STEM Students' Recognition of a “STEM Person”.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching61 (5): 1062–1092.
23.
ClarkSheriChristinaDyarElizabethInmanNinaMaungLondonBonita. 2021. “Women’s Career Confidence in a Fixed, Sexist STEM Environment.” International Journal of STEM Education8 (1): 56.
24.
CockburnCynthia. 1991. In the Way of Women. Cornell University Press.
25.
ConnellRaewyn. 1987. Gender and Power. Polity.
26.
CookLisa. 2020. “Policies to Broaden Participation in the Innovation Process.” The Hamilton Project11: 1–23.
27.
CorbettChristianneHillCatherine. 2015. “Solving the Equation: The Variables for Women’s Success in Engineering and Computing.” American Association of University Women.
28.
DahlJulia. 2018. “Women’s Under-Confidence and Men’s Over-Confidence in STEM.” A Dissertation in Psychology at Pennsylvania State University.
29.
DamaskeSarahElaineEcklundLincolnAnnaWhiteVirginia. 2014. “Male Scientists’ Competing Devotions to Work and Family.” Work and Occupations41 (4): 477–507.
30.
DingWaverlyMurrayFionnaTobyStuart. 2006. “Gender Differences in Patenting in the Academic Life Sciences.” Science313: 665–667.
31.
DuncansonClaire. 2015. “Hegemonic Masculinities and the Possibility of Change in Gender Relations.” Men and Masculinities18 (2): 231–248.
32.
EatonAsiaSaundersJessicaJacobsonRyanKeonWest. 2020. “How Gender and Race Stereotypes Impact the Advancement of Scholars in STEM.” Sex Roles82 (4): 127–141.
33.
EesleyCharlesWangYanbo. 2017. “Social Influence in Career Choice.” Research Policy46 (3): 636–650.
34.
EisenDanielYamashitaLiann. 2019. “Borrowing From Femininity.” Men and Masculinities22 (5): 801–820.
35.
EpsteinAlannaNathalieDuval-CouetilAileenHuang-Saad. 2022. “Gender Differences in Academic Entrepreneurship.” International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship14 (1): 117–141.
36.
ErlandssonAnni. 2019. “Do Men Favor Men in Recruitment?” Work and Occupations46 (3): 239–264.
37.
EtzkowitzHenry. 2002. MIT and the Rise of Entrepreneurial Science. Routledge.
38.
FaulknerWendy. 2007. “Nuts and Bolts and People.” Social Studies of Science37 (3): 331–56.
HanesSerenaKatharineKuLisaPrimianoAnnArvin. 2018. “Gender Analysis of Invention Disclosures and Companies Founded by Stanford University Faculty From 2000-2014.” les Nouvelles-Journal of the Licensing Executives Society53 (1): 83–90.
47.
HearnJonathanCollinsonDavid. 1996. Men as Managers, Managers as Men. Sage Publications.
48.
HendersonRebeccaAdamJaffeManuelTrajtenberg. 1998. “Universities as a Source of Commercial Technology.” The Review of Economics and Statistics80 (1): 119–127.
49.
HillCatherineChristianneCorbettRose AndresseSt. 2010. Why so Few?American Association of University Women.
50.
HoganMaureenPursellTimothy. 2008. “The ‘Real Alaskan.” Men and Masculinities11 (1): 63–85.
51.
HuntJenniferJean-PhilipeGarantHermanHannahDavidMunroe. 2013. “Why are Women Underrepresented Among Patentees?” Research Policy42: 831–843.
KellyDominicBeltzAdriene. 2022. “Spatial Skills and Self-Perceived Masculinity.” Sex Roles87 (5): 251–266.
54.
KohsTiaSamuelClarinCarterRichKarlMundorffPrincessImoukhuedeAnandRamamurthiGangBaoKingMichaelOwenMcCarty. 2023. “Innovation and Entrepreneurship in Promotion and Tenure in Biomedical Engineering.” Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering16 (3): 181–185.
55.
KoulRavinder. 2018. “Work and Family Identities and Engineering Identities.” Journal of Engineering Education107 (2): 219–237.
56.
KuschelKatherinaKerstinEttlCristinaDíaz-GarcíaAlsosGry Agnete. 2020. “Stemming the Gender Gap in STEM Entrepreneurship–Insights Into Women’s Entrepreneurship in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics.” The International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal16 (1): 1–15.
57.
LeaheyErinBlumeAmelia. 2017. “Elucidating the Process.” In Gender and Entrepreneurial Activity. Edward Elgar Publishing.
58.
LiaoChienLianJiunn-Woei. 2024. “Gender Inequality in Applying Research Project and Funding.” Journal of Information Science50 (2): 546–554.
59.
MartinPatricia. 2003. “‘Said and Done’ Versus ‘Saying and Doing’.” Gender & Society17 (3): 342–366.
60.
MathiasBlakeWilliamsDavidSmithAdam. 2015. “Entrepreneurial Inception.” Journal of Business Venturing30 (1): 11–28.
61.
McDevittValerieJoelleMendez-HindsDavidWindwoodVinitNijhawanToddShererJohnRitterPaulSanberg. 2014. “More than Money.” Technology and Innovation16 (1): 75–84.
62.
MeleroEduardoNeusPalomerasDavidWehrheim. 2020. “The Effect of Patent Protection on Inventor Mobility.” Management Science66 (12): 5485–5504.
63.
MenonMayaShekharPrateek. 2025. “Developing a Conceptual Framework.” Research in Science Education55 (1): 81–102.
MickeyEthelSmith-DoerrLaurel. 2022. “Gender and Innovation Through an Intersectional Lens.” Sociology Compass16 (3): e12964.
66.
MillerGloria. 2003. “Frontier Masculinity in the Oil Industry.” Gender, Work and Organization11 (1): 47–73.
67.
MilliJessicaBarbaraGaultEmmaWilliams-BaronJennyXiaMeikaBerlan. 2016. “The Gender Patenting Gap.” Institute for Women’s Policy ResearchC441: 1–10.
68.
Moss-RacusinCorineJohnDavidioVictoriaBrescollMarkGrahamJoHandelsman. 2012. “Science Faculty’s Subtle Gender Bias Favors Male Students.” Proceedings of the National Academies of Science of the United States of America109 (41): 16474–16479.
69.
MurrayFionaGrahamLeigh. 2007. “Buying Science and Selling Science.” Industrial and Corporate Change16 (4): 657–689.
70.
NelsonT.2020. The Academic Entrepreneurship of Women Faculty in STEM. ARC Network.
71.
OfemBrandonSamuelPolizziGregoryRushton, et al.2019. “Gender Effects on Perceived Professional Mastery.” Academy of Management Proceedings2019 (1): 14092.
72.
OldenzielRuth. 2004. Making Technology Masculine. University of Amsterdam Press.
73.
Owen-SmithJasonPowellWalter. 2003. “The Expanding Role of Patenting in the Life Sciences.” Research Policy32 (9): 1695–1711.
74.
PérezRaulGreeneViveca. 2016. “Debating Rape Jokes vs. Rape Culture.” Social Semiotics26 (3): 265–282.
75.
PershingJana. 2006. “Men and Women's Experiences With Hazing in a Male-Dominated Elite Military Institution.” Men and Masculinities8 (4): 470–492.
76.
PlesterBarbara. 2015. “Take it Like a Man.” Ephemera: Theory & Politics in Organization15 (3): 537–559.
77.
Quam-WickhamNancy. 1999. “Rereading Man’s Conquest of Nature.” Men and Masculinities2 (2): 135–151.
78.
ReidErinOliviaO’NeillMaryBlair-Loy. 2018. “Masculinities in Male-Dominated Occupations.” Journal of Social Issues74 (3): 579–606.
79.
RidgewayCelia. 2011. Framed by Gender. Oxford University Press.
80.
Riegle-CrumbCatherinePengMangluJennyBuontempo. 2019. “Gender, Competitiveness, and Intentions to Pursue STEM Fields.” International Journal of Gender, Science, and Technology11 (2): 324–257.
81.
RossiterMargaret. 1993. “The Matthew Matilda Effect in Science.” Social Studies of Science23 (2): 325–341.
82.
RothPhilipHauptAndrea. 2025. “How Gender Differences in Informal Networking Result in Unequal Access to Interorganizational R&D Projects.” Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research38 (1): 397–418.
83.
SanbergPaulMortezaGharibPatrickHarkerEricKalerRichardMarchaseTimothySandsNasserArshandiSarkarSudeep. 2014. “Changing the Academic Culture.” PNAS111 (18): 6542–6547.
84.
SchrockDouglasSchwalbeMichael. 2009. “Men, Masculinity, and Manhood Acts.” Annual Review of Sociology35: 277–295.
85.
SchusterW. MichaelMarcowitz-BittonMiriamDeborahGerhardt. 2022. “The Gender Gap in Academic Patenting.” UC Davis Law Review56: 759.
86.
SchwalbeMichael. 2015. Manhood Acts. Routledge.
87.
SeronCarollSusanSilbeyErinCechBrianRubineau. 2016. “Persistence is Cultural.” Work and Occupations43 (2): 178–214.
88.
SlaughterSheilaRhoadesGary. 2004. Academic Capitalism and the New Economy. Johns Hopkins University Press.
89.
Smith-DoerrLaurelFitzpatrickDeborahSharlaAlegriaDonaldTomaskovic-DeveyFealingKaye Husbands. 2019. “Gender Pay Gaps in U.S. Federal Science Agencies.” American Journal of Sociology125 (2): 534–576.
90.
SubramaniGauriAbhayAnejaOrenReshefLouisW. S.. 2021. Persistence and the Gender Innovation Gap. Working Paper.
91.
SugimotoCassidyNiChaoqunWestJevinVincentLarivière. 2015. “The Academic Advantage.” PLoS One10 (5): e0128000.
92.
TraweekSharon. 1992. Beamtimes and Lifetimes. Harvard University Press.
93.
TreanorLorna. 2022. “Gender, STEM Women and Entrepreneurship.” International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship14 (4): 499–520.
94.
TwineFrance Windance. 2022. Geek Girls. New York University Press.
95.
WajcmanJudy. 1991. “Patriarchy, Technology, and Conceptions of Skill.” Work and Occupations18 (1): 29–45.
