Science, as it developed in Europe and the U.S. during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, set out to capture, to describe, and to catalogue what was considered the “natural” black male body. Scientists succeeded not merely in describing such a body but, in effect, in producing this body and therein in creating a particular social (and psychic) reality for black men (and women). This scientific grammar of black masculinity allowed the dominant culture to discriminate dark male bodies (i.e., to set them apart from white male bodies) and to control them for materialist and psychological reasons.
BaldwinJ. (1988). Giovanni's room. New York: Modern Library Dell.
2.
BarthesR. (1972). Mythologies. (LavasA.. Trans.). New York: Hill and Wang. (Original work published 1957)
3.
BrocaP. (1860). Recherches sur l'hybridité animale en général et sur l'hybridité humaine en particulier [Studies on animal hybridity with special attention to the hybridity of humans]. Paris: Imprimerie de J. Cloye.
4.
CalhounJ. (1853). Works. In CralléR. (Ed.). The works of John Calhoun. New York: D. Appleton.
5.
CarbyH. (1986). On the threshold of women's era: Lynching, Empire, and Sexuality. In GatesH. (Ed.), Race, writing and difference (pp 300–322). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6.
ColfaxR. (1833). Evidence against the views of the abolitionists, consisting of physical and moral proofs of the natural inferiority of the negro. New York: J.T.M. Bleakley.
7.
CralléR. (Ed.). (1870). The works of John Calhoun. New York: D. Appleton.
8.
DraytonW. (1836). The south vindicated from the treason and fanaticism of the northern abolitionists. Philadelphia: H. Manly.
9.
EnglishW. T. (1903). The Negro problem from the physician's point of view. Atlanta Journal-Record of Medicine, 5, 460–472.
10.
FisherT. (1990). Isaac Julien looking for Langston: Montage of a dream deferred. Third Text, 12, 59–70.
11.
FredricksonG. M. (1987). The black image in the white mind: The debate on Afro-American character and destiny 1817–1914. Wesleyan, MA: Wesleyan University Press.
12.
FriedmanD. (2001). A mind of its own: A cultural history of the penis. New York: The Free Press.
13.
Genital peculiarities of the Negro. (1903). (no author credited). Atlanta Journal-Record of Medicine, 4, 830–844.
14.
GouldB. A. (1869). Investigations in the military and anthropological statistics of American soldiers. New York: Hurd & Houghton.
15.
HallerJ. S. (1995). Outcasts from evolution: Scientific attitudes of racial inferiority, 1859–1900. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
16.
HonourH. (Ed.). (1988). The image of the black in western art (Vol. 4). Boston: Harvard University Press.
17.
HorowitzM. C. (1992). Race, gender, and rank: Early modern ideas of rank. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
18.
HowardW. L. (1903). The Negro as a distinct ethnic factor in civilization. Medicine, 10, 420–433.
19.
HunterM. & LydstonG. F. (1893). Sexual crimes among southern negroes: Scientifically considered. Louisville, KY: Renz & Henry.
20.
JamesonF. (1981). The political unconscious: Narratives as a socially symbolic act. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
21.
JayM. (1999). Returning the gaze: The American response to the French critique of ocularcentrism. In WeissG. & HaberH. F. (Eds.), Perspectives on embodiment: The intersections of nature and culture (pp. 165–182). New York: Routledge.
22.
JeffersonT. (1944). Notes on Virginia. In KochA. & PedenW. (Eds.), The life and selected writing of Thomas Jefferson (pp. 256–262). New York: The Modern Library. (Original work publish 1784)
23.
KuhnT. (1970). The structure of scientific revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24.
LavaterJ. (1829). Physiognomik. Wien: Sollinger.
25.
LottE. (1993). Love and theft: Blackface minstrelsy and the American working class. New York: Oxford University Press.
26.
LydstonF. C. (1906). Castration instead of lynching. Atlanta Journal-Record of Medicine, 8, 457.
27.
MurrellT. W. (1909). Syphilis and the American Negro: A medico-sociological study. Transactions. Richmond: Medical Society of Virginia.
28.
NelsonD. (1998). National manhood: Capitalist citizenship and the imagined fraternity of white men. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
29.
QuételetL. (1836). Sur l'homme et le developpement des ses facultés [On man and the development of his faculties]. Brussels: Hauman et Comp.
30.
SchiebingerL. (1993). Nature's body: Gender in the making of modern science. Boston: Beacon Press.
31.
SekulaA. (1986). The body and the archive. October, 39, 1–15.
32.
ShuteD. K. (1896). Racial anatomical peculiarities. New York Journal of Medicine, LXIII, 500.
33.
SmithS. M. (2001). Looking at one's self through the eyes of others: W.E.B. DuBois's photographs for the 1900 Paris exposition. African American Review, 34, 581–599.
34.
TalbotE. S. (1899). Degeneracy: Its causes, signs, and results. London: Macmillan.
35.
ThompsonJ. A. (1899). The influences of posture on the form of the articular surfaces of the tibia and astragalus in the different races of man and the higher apes. Journal of Anatomy and Physiology, 23, 616–639.
36.
Van EvrieJ. H. (1868). White supremacy and negro subordination. New York: Van Evrie & Co.
37.
WrightW. W. (1860). Amalgamation. De Bow's Review, 29, 3–14.
