Prior studies that show no association between fathers’ work flexibility and their domestic contributions suffer from measurement limitations and/or the lack of nationally representative data. Using data on fathers in different-sex partnerships (n = 1,956) from the 2017–2018 American Time Use Survey Leave Module, we examine three indicators (use, frequency of use and reason for use) of working from home—a work–family benefit is known as flexplace—and consider whether partners’ employment status moderates the association between flexplace and fathers’ time in domestic labor. Fathers who use flexplace benefits report more routine childcare, regardless of the reason for flexplace use or their partners’ employment status. The association between flexplace use and fathers’ housework time is conditional on their partners’ employment status and fathers’ rationale for working from home.
AllenT. D.ShockleyK.2009. “Flexible Work Arrangements: Help or Hype.” In Handbook of Families and Work: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, edited by CraneRussellJeffrey HilE.l, 265–286. University Press.
2.
AumannK.GalinskyE.MatosK.2011. The New Male Mystique. Hillsborough, NJ: Families and Work Institute.
3.
BachA. S.2019. “The Ambiguous Construction of Nondominant Masculinity: Configuring the “New” Man through Narratives of Choice, Involved Fatherhood, and Gender Equality.” Men and Masculinities, 22 (2): 338–359. doi:10.1177/1097184X17715494.
4.
BianchiS. M.SayerL. C.MilkieM. A.RobinsonJ. P.2012. “Housework: Who Did, Does or Will Do it, and How Much Does it Matter?” Social Forces, 91(1): 55–63. doi:10.2307/41683183.
5.
Blair-LoyM. (2003). Competing Devotions: Career and Family among Women Executives. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
6.
BolzendahlC. I.MyersD. J.2004. “Feminist Attitudes and Support for Gender Equality: Opinion Change in Women and Men, 1974–1998.” Social Forces83 (2): 759–789. doi:10.1353/sof.2005.0005.
7.
BorgkvistA.EliottJ.CrabbS.MooreV.2020. “Unfortunately I’ma Massively Heavy Sleeper”: An Analysis of Fathers’ Constructions of Parenting. Men and Masculinities23 (3–4): 680–701.
8.
BünningM.2015. “What Happens After the ‘Daddy Months’? Fathers’ Involvement in Paid Work, Childcare, and Housework after Taking Parental Leave in Germany. European Sociological Review31 (6): 738–748. doi:10.1093/esr/jcv072.
9.
Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2018. American Time Use Survey User’s Guide. Washington, DC: Bureau of Labor Statistics.
10.
Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2019. American Time Use Survey (ATUS) Data Dictionary: 2017–18 Leave and Job Flexibilities Module Data. Washington, DC: Bureau of Labor Statistics.
11.
CarlsonD. L.MillerA. J.SasslerS.2018. “Stalled for Whom? Change in the Division of Particular Housework Tasks and their Consequences for Middle-to Low-income Couples. Socius4: 2378023118765867. doi:10.1177/2378023118765867.
ChesleyN.FloodS.2017. “Signs of Change? At-Home and Breadwinner Parents’Housework and Child-Care Time.” Journal of Marriage and Family79 (2): 511–534. doi:10.1111/jomf.12376.
14.
CiabattariT. 2004. “Cohabitation and Housework: The Effects of Marital Intentions. Journal of Marriage and Family66 (1): 118–125. doi:10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00008.x-i1.
15.
ClawsonD.GerstelN.2014. Unequal Time: Gender, Class, and Family in Employment Schedules. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
16.
CollinsC.2019. Making Motherhood Work: How Women Manage Careers and Caregiving. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
17.
CraigL.2006. Does Father Care Mean Fathers Share? A Comparison of How Mothers and Fathers in Intact Families Spend time with Children. Gender & Society20 (2): 259–281. doi:10.1177/0891243205285212.
18.
CraigL.PowellA.2012. “Dual-earner Parents’ Work-family Time: The Effects of Atypical Work Patterns and Non-parental Childcare.” Journal of Population Research29 (3): 229–247. doi:10.1007/s12546-012-9086-5.
DernbergerB. N.PepinJ. R.2020. “Gender Flexibility, but Not Equality: Young Adults’ Division of Labor Preferences.” Sociological Science7: 36–56. doi:10.15195/v7.a2.
21.
DiamondC.2002. “Telework: A ‘Family-friendly’ work Arrangement.” Labour & Industry: A Journal of the Social and Economic Relations of Work, 13 (1): 39–54. doi:10.1080/10301763.2002.10669255.
22.
ElliottK. 2016. “Caring Masculinities: Theorizing an Emerging Concept. Men and Masculinities19: 240–259.
23.
EstesS. B.NoonanM. C.MaumeD. J.2007. “Is Work-family Policy Use Related to the Gendered Division of Housework.” Journal of Family and Economic Issues28 (4): 527–545.
24.
GalinskyE.SakaiK.WigtonT.2011. “Workplace Flexibility: From Research to Action.” The Future of Children, 21: 141–161. doi:10.2307/41289633.
25.
GlassJ. L.NoonanM. C.2016. “Telecommuting and Earnings Trajectories among American Women and Men 1989–2008.” Social Forces95 (1): 217–250. doi:10.1093/sf/sow034.
26.
HaddonL.SilverstoneR.1993. Teleworking in the 1990s: A View from the Home. SPRU CICT Report No. 10 CICT, SPRU, University of Sussex. Martlesham, England: British Telecom.
27.
HardwickD.SalaffJ. W.1997. Fragmented Lives: How Do Teleworking Parents Juggle Work and Children Care? In Proceedings of the Thirtieth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (Vol. 4, 81–93). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
28.
HarringtonB.McHughT. L.FraoneJ. S.2019. Expanded Paid Parental Leave: Measuring the Impact of Leave on Work & Family. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College Center for Work & Family.
29.
HilbrechtM.ShawS. M.JohnsonL. C.AndreyJ.2008. “‘I’m Home for the Kids’: Contradictory Implications for Work-life Balance of Teleworking Mothers.” Gender, Work & Organization15 (5): 454–476. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0432.2008.00413.x.
30.
HillE. J.HawkinsA. J.MärtinsonV.FerrisM.2003. “Studying “Working Fathers”: Comparing Fathers’ and Mothers’Work-family Conflict, Fit, and Adaptive Strategies in a Global High-tech Company.” Fathering1 (3): 239–261. doi:10.3149/fth.0103.239.
31.
HillE. J.GrzywaczJ. G.AllenS.BlanchardV. L.Matz-CostaC.ShulkinS.Pitt-CatsouphesM.2008. “Defining and Conceptualizing Workplace Flexibility. Community, Work and Family11 (2): 149–163. doi:10.1080/13668800802024678.
32.
HillE. J.YangC.HawkinsA. J.FerrisM.2004. “A Cross-cultural Test of the Work-family Interface in 48 Countries.” Journal of Marriage and Family66 (5): 1300–1316. doi:10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00094.x.
33.
HolmesE. K.PettsR. J.ThomasC. R.RobbinsN. L.HenryT.2020. “Do Workplace Characteristics Moderate the Effects of Attitudes on Father Warmth and Engagement.” Journal of Family Psychology34: 867–878. doi:10.1037/fam0000672.
34.
HookJ. L.2006. “Care in Context: Men’s Unpaid Work in 20 Countries, 1965–2003. American Sociological Review71 (4): 639–660. doi:10.1177/000312240607100406.
35.
KayT.1998. “Having it all or Doing it All? The Construction of Women’s Lifestyles in Time-crunched Households.”Loisir et Societe/Society and Leisure21 (2): 435–454. doi:10.1080/07053436.1998.10753663.
36.
KimJ.2018. “Workplace Flexibility and Parent–child Interactions among Working Parents in the US.” Social Indicators Research, 1–43.
KotsadamA.FinseraasH.2011. “The State Intervenes in the Battle of the Sexes: Causal Effects of Paternity Leave.” Social Science Research40: 1611–1622. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2011.06.011.
39.
KroskaA.ElmanC.2009. “Change in Attitudes about Employed Mothers: Exposure, Interests, and Gender Ideology Discrepancies.” Social Science Research38 (2): 366–382. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2008.12.004.
40.
LambertS. J.FugielP. J.HenlyJ. R.2014. Schedule Unpredictability among Early Career Workers in the US Labor Market: A National Snapshot. Chicago, IL: Employment Instability, Family Well-being, and Social Policy Network, University of Chicago.
LottY.ChungH.2016. “Gender Discrepancies in the Outcomes of Schedule Control on Overtime Hours and Income in Germany.” European Sociological Review32 (6): 752–765. doi:10.1093/esr/jcw032.
43.
NoonanM.2013. “The Impact of Social Policy on the Gendered Division of Housework.” Journal of Family Theory & Review5 (2): 124–134. doi:10.1111/jftr.12008.
44.
NoonanM. C.EstesS. B.GlassJ. L.2007. “Do Workplace Flexibility Policies Influence Time Spent in Domestic Labor?” Journal of Family Issues28 (2): 263–288. doi:10.1177/0192513X06292703.
45.
ParkerK.LivingstonG.2017. Six Facts about American Fathers. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
46.
PedullaD. S.ThébaudS.2015. “Can We Finish the Revolution? Gender, Work-family Ideals, and Institutional Constraint.” American Sociological Review80 (1): 116–139.
47.
PettsR. J.CarlsonD. L.KnoesterC.2020. “If I [Take] Leave, Will You Stay? Paternity Leave and Relationship Stability.” Journal of Social Policy, 49 (4): 829–849.
48.
PettsR. J.KnoesterC.2018. “Paternity Leave-taking and Father Engagement.” Journal of Marriage and Family80 (5): 1144–1162. doi:10.1111/jomf.12494.
49.
PettsR. J.KnoesterC.WaldfogelJ.2020. “Fathers’ Paternity Leave-taking and Children’s Perceptions of Father-child Relationships in the United States.” Sex Roles82: 173–188.
50.
PettsR. J.ShaferK. M.EssigL.2018. “Does Adherence to Masculine Norms Shape Fathering Behavior?” Journal of Marriage and Family80 (3): 704–720. doi:10.1111/jomf.12476.
51.
RhoadsS. E.RhoadsC. H.2012. “Gender Roles and Infant/toddler Care: Male and Female Professors on the Tenure Track.” Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 6 (1): 13. doi:10.1037/h0099227.
52.
RidgewayC. L.CorrellS. J.2004. “Unpacking the Gender System: A Theoretical Perspective on Gender Beliefs and Social Relations. Gender & Society18 (4): 510–531. doi:10.1177/0891243204265269.
53.
RismanB. J.1999. Gender Vertigo: American Families in Transition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
54.
RossC. E. 1987. “The Division of Labor at Home. Social Forces65 (3): 816–833. doi:10.1093/sf/65.3.816.
55.
RudmanL. A.MescherK.2013. “Penalizing Men Who Request a Family Leave: Is Flexibility Stigma a Femininity Stigma.” Journal of Social Issues69 (2): 322–340. doi:10.1111/josi.12017.
56.
SayerL. C.2016. “Trends in Women’s and Men’s Time Use, 1965–2012: Back to the Future?” In Gender and Couple Relationships, edited by McHaleS. M.KingV.Van HookJ.BoothA., 43–78. Salmon Tower Building, NY: Springer International Publishing.
57.
ScarboroughW. J.SinR.RismanB.2019. “Attitudes and the Stalled Gender Revolution: Egalitarianism, Traditionalism, and Ambivalence from 1977 through 2016.” Gender & Society33 (2): 173–200. doi:10.1177/0891243218809604.
58.
SchiemanS.GlavinP.2008. “Trouble at the Border: Gender, Flexibility at Work, and the Work-home Interface.” Social Problems55 (4): 590–611. doi:10.1525/sp.2008.55.4.590.
59.
SharpeD. L.HermsenJ. M.BillingsJ.2002. “Gender Differences in Use of Alternative Full-time Work Arrangements by Married Workers.” Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal31 (1): 78–111. doi:10.1177/1077727X02031001004.
60.
SheltonB. A.JohnD.1993. “Does Marital Status Make a Difference? Housework among Married and Cohabiting Men and Women.” Journal of Family Issues14 (3): 401–420.
61.
ShockleyK. M.AllenT. D.2007. “When Flexibility Helps: Another Look at the Availability of Flexible Work Arrangements and Work–Family Conflict.” Journal of Vocational Behavior71 (3): 479–493. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2007.08.006.
62.
SilverH.1993. “Homework and Domestic Work.” Sociological Forum8 (2):181–204. doi:10.1007/BF01115489.
63.
StaffordR.BackmanE.DibonaP.1977. “The Division of Labor among Cohabiting and Married Couples.” Journal of Marriage and the Family39 (1): 43–57. doi:10.2307/351061.
64.
SullivanC.LewisS.2001. “Home-based Telework, Gender, and the Synchronization of Work and Family: Perspectives of Teleworkers and their Co-residents. Gender, Work & Organization8 (2): 123–145. doi:10.1111/1468-0432.00125.
ThébaudS.HalcombL.2019. “One Step Forward? Advances and Setbacks on the Path toward Gender Equality in Families and Work.” Sociology Compass13 (6): e12700. doi:10.1111/soc4.12700.
67.
WrayD.2020. “Paternity Leave and Fathers’ Responsibility: Evidence from a Natural Experiment in Canada.” Journal of Marriage and Family82 (2): 534–549. doi:10.1111/jomf.12661.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
