The aim of this article is to revisit the significance of national and nation-state animal symbolism within the context of modern constitutionalism and its democratic emphasis on equal rights, regardless of gender. I discuss the problematic conveyance of gender inclusiveness through the animal sign, and how both at a linguistic and at a visual level (through sexual monomorphism and dimorphism), gender politics may become inscribed within the anthropomorphized animal and its body. I then turn to examine recent examples in which women’s inclusion within the animal symbol has been debated or once again dismissed through a reinstatement of patriarchal expectations. I close the article with a few questions regarding how (and/or whether) the type of gender equality desired and proclaimed by modern nation-states could potentially become encrypted within the animal body.
AlvesR. R. N.BarbozaR. R. D.2018. “The Role of Animals in Human Culture.” In Ethnozoology: Animals in Our Lives, edited by AlvesR.N.N.AlbuquerqueU.P., 277–302. London, UK: Academic Press.
6.
BakerSteve. 2001. Picturing the Beast: Animals, Identity, and Representation (1993). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
BerlandJ.2015. “The Work of the Beaver.” In Material Cultures in Canada, edited by AllenT.BlairJ., 25–50. Ontario, Canada: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.
Consejo de Mujeres del Municipio de Madrid. 2007. “Soy Una Osa.” Unpublished document. Madrid.
11.
CraryA.2016. Inside Ethics. On the Demands of Moral Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12.
de PinhoJ. R.GriloC.BooneR. B.GalvinK. A.SnodgrassJ. G.2014. “Influence of Aesthetic Appreciation of Wildlife Species on Attitudes Towards their Conservation in Kenyan Agropastoralist Communities.” PLoS ONE9 (2), e88842.
13.
DonovanJ.1993. “Animal Rights and Feminist Theory.” In Ecofeminism: Women, Animals, Nature, edited by GaardG., 167–194. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
14.
DurkheimE.1995. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life (1912). Translated by FieldsK.E.New York: The Free Press.
GaarderE.2011. Women and the Animal Rights Movement. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
17.
GeislerM. E.2005. “Introduction.” In National Symbols, Fractured Identities: Contesting the National Narrative, edited by GeislerM.E., XIII–XLII). Middlebury, VT: Middlebury College Press.
18.
GossR. J.1983. Deer Antlers: Regeneration, Function, and Evolution. New York: Academic Press.
19.
HammerschlagN.GallagherA. J.2017. “Extinction Risk and Conservation of the Earth’s National Animal Symbols.” BioScience67 (8), 744–749.
20.
HerzogH.A.2007. “Gender Differences in Human-animal Interactions: A Review.” Anthozoös20 (1), 7–21.
LølandH.2008. Silent or Salient Gender? The Interpretation of Gendered God-language in the Hebrew Bible, Exemplified in Isaiah 42, 46 and 49. Tübingen, Germany: Mohr Siebeck.
27.
López-RodríguezI.2009. “Of Women, Bitches, Chickens and Vixens: Animal Metaphors for Women in English and Spanish.” Cultura, Lenguaje y Representación/Culture, Language and Representation7, 77–100.
28.
MachZ.1993. Symbols, Conflict, and Identity. Essays in Political Anthropology. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
29.
MartinM. M.2009. The Mighty Scot: Nation, Gender, and the Nineteenth-century Mystique of Scottish Masculinity. New York: SUNY Press.
30.
MasonJ.2007. “Animals: From Souls and the Sacred in Prehistoric Times to Symbols and Slaves in Antiquity.” In A Cultural History of Animals in Antiquity, edited by KalofL., 17–45. Oxford, UK: Berg.
31.
McClintockA.1991. “‘No Longer in a Future Heaven’: Women and Nationalism in South Africa.” Transition51, 104–123.
32.
McClintockA.1995. Imperial leather: Race, Gender, and Sexuality in the Colonial Context. New York: Routledge.
33.
MerskinD.2016. “Media Theories and Crossroads of Critical Animal and Media Studies.” In Critical Animal and Media Studies: Communication for Nonhuman Animal Advocacy, edited by AlmirónN.ColeM.FreemanC. P., 11–25. New York: Routledge.
34.
MinahanJ.2010. The Complete Guide to National Symbols and Emblems, Vols. 1–2. Santa Barbara, CA: Greenwood Press.
35.
MulhollandJ.MontagnaN.Sanders-McDonaghE., eds. 2018. Gendering Nationalism: Intersections of Nation, Gender and Sexuality. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
36.
NagelJ.1998. “Masculinity and Nationalism: Gender and Sexuality in the Making of Nations.” Ethnic and Racial Studies21 (2), 242–269.
37.
NilsenA. P.1996. “Of Ladybugs and Billy Goats: What Animal Species Names Tell about Human Perceptions of Gender.” Metaphor and Symbolic Activity11 (4), 257–271.
38.
OmarK.2004. “National Symbolism in Constructions of Gender: Transformed Symbols in Post-conflict States.” Seton Hall Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations5 (1), 49–67.
39.
PastoureauM.1985. “LÉtat et Son Image Emblématique.” In Culture et Idéologie dans la Genèse de l’État Moderne. Actes de la Table Ronde de Rome (15-17 Octobre 1984), 145–153. Rome: École Française de Rome.
40.
PastoureauM.2017. “Le Coq Médiéval: Jalons Pour Une Histoire Symbolique.” Revue d’ethnoécologie12, 1–12.
41.
PlatoffA. M.2012. “The ‘Forward Russia’ Flag: Examining the Changing Use of the Bear as a Symbol of Russia.” Raven: A Journal of Vexilology19, 99–126.
42.
PlumwoodV.1993. Feminism and the Mastery of Nature. London, UK: Routledge.
RossiterC. S.2010. The Turkey and the Eagle: The Struggle for America’s Global Role. New York: Algora Publishing.
45.
ShukinN.2009. Animal Capital: Rendering Life in Biopolitical Times. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
46.
SilaškiN.2014. “Animal Metaphors and Semantic Derogation—Do Women Think Differently from Men?” Gender Studies12 (1), 319–332.
47.
SilaškiN.KilyeniA.2014. “Beauty and the Beast” from a Cognitive Linguistic Perspective: Animal Metaphors for Women in Serbian and Romanian. Gender Studies13 (1), 163–178.
48.
SleeboomM.2002. “The Power of National Symbols: The Credibility of a Dragon’s Efficacy.” Nations and Nationalism8 (3), 299–313.
49.
WarrenK. J.2000. Ecofeminist Philosophy. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
