This article undertakes the first known qualitative study focusing on The Red Pill, an online forum wherein heterosexual men attempt to improve their seduction skills by discussing evolutionary psychology and economic theories. My content analysis of twenty-six documents (130,000 words) designated by the community as central to its purpose and ideology shows that The Red Pill is not just an expression of hegemonic masculinity but also explicitly integrates neoliberal and scientific discourses into its seduction strategies. I theorize that the resulting philosophy superficially resolves a contradiction between hegemonic masculinity’s prescriptive emotional walls and an inherent desire for connection by constructing women as exchangeable commodities.
BaumeisterR. F.VohsK. D.2004. “Sexual Economics: Sex as Female Resource for Social Exchange in Heterosexual Interactions.” Personality and Social Psychology Review8:339–63.
BussD.1994. The Evolution of Desire. New York: Basic Books.
6.
CharmazK.2014. Constructing Grounded Theory, 2nd ed. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
7.
ConnellR.2012. “Masculinity Research and Global Change.” Masculinities & Social Change1:4–18.
8.
DragiewiczM.BurgessJ.Matamoros-FernándezA.SalterM.SuzorN. P.WoodlockD.HarrisB.2018. “Technology Facilitated Coercive Control: Domestic Violence and the Competing Roles of Digital Media Platforms.” Feminist Media Studies18:609–25.
9.
FincherD. (Director). 1999. Fight Club[Motion picture]. US: Twentieth Century Fox.
10.
GingD.2017. “Alphas, Betas, and Incels: Theorizing the Masculinities of the Manosphere.” Men and Masculinities. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/1097184X17706401.
11.
GingD.SiaperaE.2018. “Special Issue on Online Misogyny”. Feminist Media Studies18:515–24.
12.
GotellL.DuttonE.2016. “Sexual Violence in the ‘Manosphere’: Antifeminist Men’s Rights Discourses on Rape.” International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy5:65–80.
13.
HarawayD.1991. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge.
14.
HenricksK.2017. “‘I’m Principled Against Slavery, but…’: Colorblindness and the Three-fifths Debate.” Social Problems65:285–304.
15.
HineC.2008. “Virtual Ethnography: Modes, Varieties, Affordances.” In The SAGE Handbook of Online Research Methods, edited by FieldingN.LeeR. M.BlankG., 257–70. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
16.
HodappC.2017. Men’s Rights, Gender, and Social Media. New York: Lexington Books.
17.
JaneE. A.2018. “Gendered Cyberhate as Workplace Harassment and Economic Vandalism.” Feminist Media Studies18:575–91.
18.
KimmelM.2013. Angry White Men: American Masculinity at the End of an Era. New York: Nation Books.
MassanariA.2017. “#Gamergate and The Fappening: How Reddit’s Algorithm, Governance, and Culture Support Toxic Technocultures.” New Media & Society19:329–46.
23.
McCaugheyM.2008. The Caveman Mystique: Pop-Darwinism and the Debates Over Sex, Violence, and Science. New York: Routledge.
24.
MountfordJ. B.2018. “Topic Modeling the Red Pill.” Social Sciences7:42. doi: 10.3390/socsci7030048.
25.
NicholasL.AgiusC.2018. The Persistence of Global Masculinism: Discourse, Gender and Neo-colonial Re-articulations of Violence. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
26.
OeschN.MiklousicI.2012. “The Dating Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Emerging Science of Human Courtship.” Evolutionary Psychology10:899–909.
27.
O’NeillR.2015. “Feminist Encounters with Evolutionary Psychology” [Special issue]. Australian Feminist Studies30:345–50.
28.
O’NeillR.2018. Seduction: Men, Masculinity and Mediated Intimacy. Medford, MA: Polity.
RobertsS. C.van VugtM.DunbarR. I. M.2012. “Evolutionary Psychology in the Modern World: Applications, Perspectives, and Strategies.” Evolutionary Psychology10:762–69.
RogersA.2005. “Chaos to Control: Men’s Magazines and the Mastering of Intimacy.” Men and Masculinities8:175–94.
33.
RudmanL. A.GlickP.2010. The Social Psychology of Gender: How Power and Intimacy Shape Gender Relations. New York: Guilford Press.
34.
SchmitzR. M.KazyakE.2016. “Masculinities in Cyberspace: An Analysis of Portrayals of Manhood in Men’s Rights Activist Websites.” Social Sciences5:18. doi: 10.3390/socsci5020018.
35.
SymonsD.1979. The Evolution of Human Sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.
ThorpeC.2016. Necroculture. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
38.
TriversR. L.1972. “Parental Investment and Sexual Selection.” In Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, 1871–1971, edited by CampbellB. G., 136–79. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
39.
WachowskiA.WachowskiL.(Directors). 1999. The Matrix[Motion picture]. US: Warner Brothers.
