Despite emerging as a clinical and scholarly focus in medical aid in dying (MAID)-related care, limited data exist to characterize hospice clinician presence while patients self-administer the medication to hasten their death.
Objectives:
To explore (1) the proportion and (2) correlates of interdisciplinary hospice clinician presence during patient self-administration of MAID medication.
Design:
Exploratory secondary analysis of cross-sectional survey data.
Setting/Subjects:
Convenience sample of interdisciplinary U.S. hospice clinicians reporting permissive state and organizational MAID policy.
Measurements:
We assessed the proportion of the sample ever having been present during patient self-administration of MAID medication via frequency and percentage. We examined personal, professional, organizational, and MAID-specific characteristics as correlates via multiple logistic regression analysis adjusted for small sample bias.
Results:
Our sample included 100 hospice physicians, nurses, social workers, and chaplains. Descriptive results revealed that just over one-third of the sample had ever been present during patient self-administration of MAID medication. Regression results indicated that being a chaplain and working for a hospice with a policy permitting full MAID participation were each significantly associated with greater odds of ever having been present. Conversely, never having provided end-of-life care beyond information provision related to a hospice patient’s use of MAID was significantly associated with lower odds of ever having been present.
Conclusions:
Hospice clinician presence during patient self-administration of MAID medication appears relatively common and related to select professional, organizational, and MAID-specific characteristics. Improved annual state reporting practices and expanded replication efforts are warranted.
PopeTM. Medical aid in dying: Key variations among U.S. state laws. J Health Life Sci Law, 2020; 14(1):25–59.
2.
U.S. Census Bureau. National population totals and components of change: 2020-2024. Annual estimates of the resident population for the United States, regions, states, District of Columbia and Puerto Rico: April 1, 2020 to July 1, 2024 (NST-EST2024-POP). December 2024. Available from: https://www.census.gov/data/tables/time-series/demo/popest/2020s-national-total.html [Last accessed: July8, 2025].
3.
BeckerTD, CagleJG, CainCL, et al.Contextualizing attitudes toward medical aid in dying in a national sample of interdisciplinary US hospice clinicians: Hospice philosophy of care, patient-centered care, and professional exposure. Palliat Care Soc Pract, 2024; 18:26323524241302097.
4.
BeckerTD, CainCL, CagleJG, et al.Willingness to be present throughout patient death via medical aid in dying in a national sample of interdisciplinary US hospice clinicians: A content analysis of rationales. Palliat Care Soc Pract, 2024; 8:26323524241288881.
5.
BuchbinderM, CainC. Medical aid in dying: New frontiers in medicine, law, and culture. Annu Rev Law Soc Sci, 2023; 19(1):195–214.
6.
FujiokaJK, MirzaRM, McDonaldPL, et al.Implementation of medical assistance in dying: A scoping review of health care providers’ perspectives. J Pain Symptom Manage, 2018; 55(6):1564–1576.
7.
WardV, FreemanS, CallanderT, et al.Professional experiences of formal healthcare providers in the provision of Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD): A scoping review. Palliat Support Care, 2021; 19(6):744–758.
8.
BrooksL. Health care provider experiences of and perspectives on medical assistance in dying: A scoping review of qualitative studies. Can J Aging, 2019; 38(3):384–396.
9.
MillsA, BrightK, WortzmanR, et al.Medical assistance in dying and the meaning of care: Perspectives of nurses, pharmacists, and social workers. Health (London), 2023; 27(1):60–77.
10.
SelbyD, WortzmanR, BeanS, et al.Perception of roles across the interprofessional team for delivery of medical assistance in dying. J Interprof Care, 2023; 37(1):39–46.
11.
RoestB, LegetC. A multidisciplinary perspective on physician-assisted dying in primary care in The Netherlands: A narrative interview study. Death Stud, 2023; 47(3):315–327.
12.
CrumleyET, KellyS, YoungJ, et al.How is the medical assistance in dying (MAID) process carried out in Nova Scotia, Canada? A qualitative process model flowchart study. BMJ Open, 2021; 11(7):e048698.
13.
HannigA. Author(iz)ing death: Medical aid‐in‐dying and the morality of suicide. Cult Anthropol, 2019; 34(1):53–77.
14.
WrightDK, ChanLS, FishmanJR, et al.“Reflection and soul searching”: negotiating nursing identity at the fault lines of palliative care and medical assistance in dying. Soc Sci Med, 2021; 289:114366.
15.
KozlovE, NowelsM, GusmanoM, et al.Aggregating 23 years of data on medical aid in dying in the United States. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2022; 70(10):3040–3044.
16.
BuchbinderM. Access to aid-in-dying in the United States: Shifting the debate from rights to justice. Am J Public Health, 2018; 108(6):754–759.
17.
BuchbinderM, BrassfieldER, MishraM. Health care providers’ experiences with implementing medical aid-in-dying in Vermont: A qualitative study. J Gen Intern Med, 2019; 34(4):636–641.
18.
CampbellCS, BlackMA. Dignity, death, and dilemmas: A study of Washington hospices and physician-assisted death. J Pain Symptom Manage, 2014; 47(1):137–153.
CampbellCS, CoxJC. Hospice-assisted death? A study of Oregon hospices on death with dignity. Am J Hosp Palliat Care, 2012; 29(3):227–235.
21.
PesutB, ThorneS, SchillerCJ, et al.The rocks and hard places of MAiD: A qualitative study of nursing practice in the context of legislated assisted death. BMC Nurs, 2020; 19(1):12.
22.
PesutB, ThorneS, SchillerC, et al.Constructing good nursing practice for medical assistance in dying in Canada: An interpretive descriptive study. Glob Qual Nurs Res, 2020; 7.
23.
SuvaG, PenneyT, McPhersonCJ. Medical assistance in dying: A scoping review to inform nurses’ practice. J Hosp Palliat Nurs, 2019; 21(1):46–53.
24.
ZworthM, SalehC, BallI, et al.Provision of medical assistance in dying: A scoping review. BMJ Open, 2020; 10(7):e036054.
25.
SobeckK, StrandGR, HoffmanDN. Describing medical aid-in-dying and nursing “leave-the-room” policies in California: A mixed methods study. J Hosp Palliat Nurs, 2024; 26(6):317–324.
26.
AbbottJ, KerwinJ, HoldenC, et al.Navigating Conflict Between Professional Nursing Commitments to Patients and Institutional “Leave the Room” Policies. 2022, January 4.
27.
AbbottJ, KerwinJ, HoldenC, et al.Hospice nurse ethics and institutional policies toward medical aid in dying. Am J Nurs, 2023; 123(6):37–43.
BeckerTD, DubersteinP, LuthEA, et al.Examining public-facing hospice medical aid in dying participation policies in legalizing US jurisdictions. J Palliat Med, 2025.
30.
DeCampM, RessalamJ, LumHD, et al.Ethics and medical aid in dying: Physicians’ perspectives on disclosure, presence, and eligibility. J Law Med Ethics, 2023; 51(3):641–650.
31.
GersonSM, KoksvikGH, RichardsN, et al.Assisted dying and palliative care in three jurisdictions: Flanders, Oregon, and Quebec. Ann Palliat Med, 2021; 10(3):3528–3539.
32.
PesutB, ThorneS, StorchJ, et al.Riding an elephant: A qualitative study of nurses’ moral journeys in the context of Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD). J Clin Nurs, 2020; 29(19–20):3870–3881.
33.
BuchbinderM. Choreographing death: A social phenomenology of medical aid-in-dying in the United States. Med Anthropol Q, 2018; 32(4):481–497.
34.
CampbellCS. Moral meanings of physician-assisted death for hospice ethics. In: Hospice Ethics: Policy and Practice in Palliative Care (KirkTW, JenningsB., eds.). Oxford University Press; 2014. pp. 223–249.
35.
KoehlerL, PasternakG, WechkinH, et al.Hospice and aid in dying: Evolution & future. National Clinicians Conference on Medical Aid in Dying; Berkeley, CA. February 14–15, 2020.
36.
MillerPJ, MeslerMA, EggmanST. Take some time to look inside their hearts: Hospice social workers contemplate physician assisted suicide. Soc Work Health Care, 2002; 35(3):53–64.
California Department of Public Health. California End of Life Option Act: 2023 Data Report. July, 2024.
39.
Oregon Health Authority, Public Health Division, Center for Health Statistics. 2024 Oregon Death with Dignity Act Data Summary. 27 March, 2025.
40.
BeckerTD, ClemSE, SaccoP, et al.Further psychometric evaluation of the eight-item Hospice Philosophy Scale: Results from a national sample of interdisciplinary hospice clinicians. J Appl Gerontol, 2025; 44(1):70–82.
41.
Public Health, 42 C.F.R. Stat. 2024, January 14.
42.
American Association for Public Opinion Research. Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys. 2023.
43.
XuY, PaceS, KimJ, et al.Threats to online surveys: Recognizing, detecting, and preventing survey bots. Soc Work Res, 2022; 46(4):343–350.
DillmanDA, SmythJD, ChristianLM. Internet, Phone, Mail, and Mixed Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. 4th ed. John Wiley & Sons Inc: Hoboken, NJ, USA; 2014.
46.
PlanteTG, VallaeysCL, ShermanAC, et al.The development of a brief version of the Santa Clara Strength of Religious Faith Questionnaire. Pastoral Psychol, 2002; 50(5):359–368.
47.
StorchEA, RobertiJW, BagnerDM, et al.Further psychometric properties of the Santa Clara Strength of Religious Faith Questionnaire—Short-Form. J Psychol Christian, 2004; 23(1):51–53.
48.
StorchEA, RobertiJW, BravataE, et al.Psychometric investigation of the Santa Clara Strength of Religious Faith Questionnaire—Short-Form. Pastoral Psychol, 2004; 52(6):479–483.
49.
GeorgeD, MalleryP. Reliability analysis. In: IBM SPSS Statistics 29 Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference. 18th ed. Routledge: New York, NY; 2024. pp. 251–262.
50.
FirthD. Bias reduction of maximum likelihood estimates. Biometrika, 1993; 80(1):27–38.
51.
RaineyC, McCaskeyK. Estimating logit models with small samples. Political Sci Res Methods, 2021; 9(3):549–564.
52.
CoveneyJ. FIRTHLOGIT: Stata module to calculate bias reduction in logistic regression. 2021.
53.
StaudtA. FIRTHFIT: Stata module to compute model fit for Firth’s logit models. 2016.
54.
LiC. Little’s test of missing completely at random. Stata J, 2013; 13(4):795–809.
55.
SchlomerGL, BaumanS, CardNA. Best practices for missing data management in counseling psychology. J Couns Psychol, 2010; 57(1):1–10.
56.
CampbellEG, KiniV, RessalamJ, et al.Physicians’ attitudes and experiences with medical aid in dying in Colorado: A “hidden population” survey. J Gen Intern Med, 2022; 37(13):3310–3317.
57.
ByockI. Core roles and responsibilities of physicians in hospice care: a statement by and for U.S. hospice and palliative care physicians. J Palliat Med, 2023; 26(5):613–621.
58.
CarlsonB, SimopolousN, GoyER, et al.Oregon hospice Chaplains’ experiences with patients requesting physician-assisted suicide. J Palliat Med, 2005; 8(6):1160–1166.
59.
SchuhmannC, SnijdewindMC, van DuijvenboodenL, et al.“If only I could start all over…” A case study of spiritual care provision to a patient with a psychiatric disorder requesting physician-assisted dying in the Netherlands. Religions (Basel), 2021; 12(9):672.
