Nearly 9 in 10 patients in the United States who use medical aid in dying (MAID) are enrolled in hospice. Jurisdictions have increasingly mandated that health organizations publicly report their MAID participation policies. Yet comprehensive examination of the prevalence and characteristics of public-facing MAID policies in U.S. hospice providers is lacking.
Objective:
The objective of this study was to comprehensively characterize the availability and content of hospices’ public-facing MAID participation policies in the 11 U.S. jurisdictions where MAID is legal.
Design:
We adopted a cross-sectional design.
Setting/Subjects:
We used the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ Hospice - General Information data set to identify Medicare-certified hospices in all 11 U.S. jurisdictions where MAID is legal.
Measurements:
Policy availability was assessed via the presence or absence of online hospice MAID participation policies. Policy content was extracted to identify and subsequently categorize clinical domains of MAID participation.
Results:
Only 39 of 724 hospices (5.4%) published a public-facing MAID participation policy. Policy availability was low even within the two jurisdictions mandating hospice online publication (0 of 52 from New Mexico [0.0%]; 14 of 389 from California [3.6%]). Moreover, even when published, policy content was highly variable and often too vague to discern which MAID-related activities were permitted. For instance, 18 of 39 policies (46.2%) did not report whether or not physicians were permitted to prescribe MAID medication.
Conclusions:
The lack of availability and specificity in hospices’ public-facing MAID participation policies may jeopardize patient access to legal end-of-life care options. Irrespective of jurisdictional mandates, greater organizational transparency is needed to support informed decision making.
PopeTM. Medical aid in dying: Key variations among U.S. state laws. J Health Life Sci Law, 2020; 14(1):25–59.
2.
U.S. Census Bureau. National population totals and components of change: 2020–2024. Annual estimates of the resident population for the United States, regions, states, District of Columbia and Puerto Rico: April 1, 2020 to July 1, 2024 (NST-EST2024-POP). December 2024. Available from: https://www.census.gov/data/tables/time-series/demo/popest/2020s-national-total.html
3.
KozlovE, NowelsM, GusmanoM, et al.Aggregating 23 years of data on medical aid in dying in the United States. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2022; 70(10):3040–3044.
4.
BuchbinderM. Access to aid-in-dying in the United States: Shifting the debate from rights to justice. Am J Public Health, 2018; 108(6):754–759.
SteinbrookR. Physician-assisted death — from Oregon to Washington State. N Engl J Med, 2008; 359(24):2513–2515.
17.
De LimaL, WoodruffR, PettusK, et al.International Association for Hospice and Palliative Care position statement: Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide. J Palliat Med, 2017; 20(1):8–14.
18.
National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization. Statement on Medical Aid in Dying [press release]. National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization; 2021.
19.
American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. Statement on Physician-Assisted Dying [press release]. American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine; 2016.
20.
Hospice and Palliative Nurses Association. HPNA Position Statement: Medical Aid in Dying (MAiD) [press release]. Hospice and Palliative Nurses Association; 2024.
21.
CampbellCS, CoxJC. Hospice-assisted death? A study of Oregon hospices on death with dignity. Am J Hosp Palliat Care, 2012; 29(3):227–235.
22.
CloseE, JeanneretR, DownieJ, et al.A qualitative study of experiences of institutional objection to medical assistance in dying in Canada: Ongoing challenges and catalysts for change. BMC Med Ethics, 2023; 24(1):71.
23.
GersonSM, KoksvikGH, RichardsN, et al.Assisted dying and palliative care in three jurisdictions: Flanders, Oregon, and Quebec. Ann Palliat Med, 2021; 10(3):3528–3539.
Institute of Medicine Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington D.C.: National Academies Press; 2001.
26.
PopeTM. Medical aid in dying laws: More accessible in more states. JAMA, 2024; 332(14):1139–1140.
27.
CampbellCS, BlackMA. Dignity, death, and dilemmas: A study of Washington hospices and physician-assisted death. J Pain Symptom Manage, 2014; 47(1):137–153.
28.
SobeckK, StrandGR, HoffmanDN. Describing medical aid-in-dying and nursing “leave-the-room” policies in California: A mixed methods study. J Hosp Palliat Nurs, 2024; 26(6):317–324.
29.
StrandGR, SobeckK, HoffmanDN. A national survey of hospice aid-in-dying policy availability and the impact of legal mandates. J Hosp Palliat Med Care, 2023; 5:Article 020.
30.
CainCL, KoenigBA, StarksH, et al.Hospital and health system policies concerning the California End of Life Option Act. J Palliat Med, 2020; 23(1):60–66.
KreftingL. Rigor in qualitative research: The assessment of trustworthiness. Am J Occup Ther, 1991; 45(3):214–222.
34.
Medicare Payment Advisory Commission. Hospice Services. Report to the Congress: Medicare payment policy. 2024. pp. 261–284.
35.
BeckerTD, CainCL, CagleJG, et al.Willingness to be present throughout patient death via medical aid in dying in a national sample of interdisciplinary US hospice clinicians: A content analysis of rationales. Palliat Care Soc Pract, 2024; 18:26323524241288881–26323524241288818.
36.
HoA, JoolaeeS, JamesonK, et al.The seismic shift in end-of-life care: Palliative care challenges in the era of medical assistance in dying. J Palliat Med, 2021; 24(2):189–194.
37.
NguyenHQ, GelmanEJ, BushTA, et al.Characterizing Kaiser Permanente Southern California’s experience with the California End of Life Option Act in the first year of implementation. JAMA Intern Med, 2018; 178(3):417–421.
BrassfieldER, BuchbinderM. Clinicians’ perspectives on the duty to inform patients about medical aid-in-dying. AJOB Empir Bioeth, 2020; 11(1):53–62.
41.
BrassfieldER, BuchbinderM. Clinical discussion of medical aid-in-dying: Minimizing harms and ensuring informed choice. Patient Educ Couns, 2021; 104(3):671–674.
42.
BuchbinderM. Aid-in-dying laws and the physician’s duty to inform. J Med Ethics, 2017; 43(10):666–669.
43.
HoA, NormanJS, JoolaeeS, et al.How does Medical Assistance in Dying affect end-of-life care planning discussions? Experiences of Canadian multidisciplinary palliative care providers. Palliat Care Soc Pract, 2021; 15.
