Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

While vital for assimilating newcomers into organizational identity in the hospitality industry, socialization may justify abusive behavior. The impact of divestiture socialization on abusive supervision thus warrants investigation. Drawing on the theory of team stimuli typology, we examined the effects of divestiture socialization on intermittent supervisory abuse within ad-hoc high-performance teams. Utilizing multistage sampling, we recruited 380 aircrew newcomers from 21 airlines in China and Singapore. A multilevel moderated mediation model was tested using hierarchical linear modeling. Results indicate that individual- and unit-level divestiture socialization promotes perceptions of intermittent abusive supervision, mediated by aggressive norms at the unit level. These effects intensify when seniority dictates resource distribution and social hierarchy. The findings advance our understanding of the repercussions of divestiture socialization for destructive leadership perceptions, aiding hospitality and tourism policymakers in improving socialization practices and resource allocation to mitigate workplace abuse.

Keywords

abusive supervision divestiture socialization aggressive norms seniority culture temporary high-performance teams

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Afshan

Kashif

Sattayawaksakul

Cheewaprakobkit

Wijenayake

(2022). Abusive supervision, supervisor undermining, and turnover intentions: Mediation of quiescent silence and desire to seek revenge among Thai banking frontliners. Management Research Review, 45(11), 1479–1502. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-03-2021-0240

Ambrose

M. L.

Ganegoda

D. B.

(2020). Abusive according to whom? Manager and subordinate perceptions of abusive supervision and supervisors’ performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 41(8), 737–756. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2472

Ariza-Montes

Leal-Rodríguez

A. L.

Leal-Millán

A. G.

(2015). A comparative study of workplace bullying among public and private employees in Europe. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 57(6), 695–700. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000000437

Bandura

(1977). Social learning theory. Prentice Hall. https://www.asecib.ase.ro/mps/Bandura_SocialLearningTheory.pdf

Bloisi

(2012). Bullying and negative behaviour in commercial kitchens [Doctoral dissertation, University of Manchester]. ProQuest. https://www.proquest.com/openview/fe8df06353e801eb561d7ebbe03d3ff8/1?cbl=51922&parentSessionId=t0kyh3UcROPQfhe%2FgBTUstd7BER4iErsyww5oJLnt7U%3D&pq-origsite=gscholar

Brislin

R. W.

(1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/135910457000100301

Cable

D. M.

Gino

Staats

B. R.

(2013). Breaking them in or eliciting their best? Reframing socialization around newcomers’ authentic self-expression. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839213477098

Cai

Parker

S. K.

Chen

Lam

(2019). How does the social context fuel the proactive fire? A multilevel review and theoretical synthesis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(2), 209–230. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2347

Chen

Kanfer

(2024). The future of motivation in and of teams. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 11(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-111821-031621

10.

Deci

E. L.

Olafsen

A. H.

Ryan

R. M.

(2017). Self-determination theory in work organizations: The state of a science. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 19–43. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113108

11.

Dedoussis

(2004). A cross-cultural comparison of organizational culture: Evidence from universities in the Arab world and Japan. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 11(1), 15–34. https://doi.org/10.1108/13527600410797729

12.

Douglas

S. C.

Martinko

M. J.

(2001). Exploring the role of individual differences in the prediction of workplace aggression. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(4), 547–559. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.4.547

13.

Dufour

Escribano

P. I.

Maoret

(2021). (How) will I socialize you? The impact of supervisor initial evaluations and subsequent support on the socialization of temporary newcomers. Organization Science, 32(3), 881–908. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2021.1468

14.

Eck

Jiang

(2024). The role of heritage interpretation and mindfulness in dark tourism experiences. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/10963480241292013

15.

El Hajal

Rowson

(2021). The future of hospitality jobs: The rise of the gig worker. Research in Hospitality Management, 11(3), 185–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/22243534.2021.2006938

16.

Enders

C. K.

Tofighi

(2007). Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, 12(2), 121–138. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.12.2.121

17.

Farh

C. I. C.

Chen

(2014). Beyond the individual victim: Multilevel consequences of abusive supervision in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(6), 1074–1095. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037636

18.

Festinger

(1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675400700202

19.

Fischer

(2008). Rewarding seniority: Exploring cultural and organizational predictors of seniority allocations. The Journal of Social Psychology, 148(2), 167–186. https://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.148.2.167-186

20.

Fischer

Smith

P. B.

(2004). Values and organizational justice: Performance- and seniority-based allocation criteria in the United Kingdom and Germany. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35(6), 669–688. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022104270110

21.

Fischer

Tian

A. W.

Lee

Hughes

D. J.

(2021). Abusive supervision: A systematic review and fundamental rethink. The Leadership Quarterly, 32(6), Article 101540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2021.101540

22.

Gjelsvik

(2002). Hotels as learning arenas. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 2(1), 31–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/150222502760347527

23.

Goetz

Wald

Freisinger

(2021). A person-environment-fit-model for temporary organizations-Antecedents for temporary working settings. International Journal of Project Management, 39(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2020.08.006

24.

Gray

C. J.

Carter

N. T.

Sears

K. L.

(2017). The UWBQ-I: An adaptation and validation of a measure of instigated incivility. Journal of Business and Psychology, 32(1), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-015-9433-6

25.

Hackman

J. R.

(1992). Group influences on individuals in organizations. In M. D.

Dunnette

L. M.

Hough

(Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 199–267). Consulting Psychologists Press. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1993-97201-004

26.

H. K.

Lin

Liang

(2019). Creating a high-performance exhibitor team: A temporary-organization perspective. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 81, 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2019.02.009

27.

Hofmann

D. A.

(1997). An overview of the logic and rationale of hierarchical linear models. Journal of Management, 23(6), 723–744. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639702300602

28.

Hong

Cho

Froese

F. J.

Shin

(2016). The effect of leadership styles, rank, and seniority on affective organizational commitment: A comparative study of U.S. and Korean employees. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management, 23(2), 340–362. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCSM-03-2014-0034

29.

Hox

Moerbeek

Van de Schoot

(2017). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315650982

30.

James

L. R.

(1982). Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(2), 219–229. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.67.2.219

31.

Jiang

Wang

Zheng

(2021). Newcomers’ reaction to the abusive supervision toward peers during organizational socialization. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 128, 103586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2021.103586

32.

Jones

G. R.

(1986). Socialization tactics, self-efficacy, and newcomers’ adjustments to organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 29(2), 262–279. https://doi.org/10.5465/256188

33.

Kanjanakan

Zhu

Doan

Kim

P. B.

(2023). Taking stock: A meta-analysis of work engagement in the hospitality and tourism context. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 47(5), 851–876. https://doi.org/10.1177/10963480211066958

34.

Kessler

Pachucki

Stummer

Mair

Binder

(2015). Types of organizational innovativeness and success in Austrian hotels. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 27(7), 1707–1727. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-03-2014-0150

35.

Lagabrielle

Encrenaz

Debruyne

Rascle

(2022). Workplace bullying: Is there a difference by enterprise size? International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 95(1), 187–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-021-01756-1

36.

Lan

Wong

C. S.

Wong

I. A.

(2022). The role of knowledge sharing in hotel newcomer socialization: A formal intervention program. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 34(6), 2250–2271. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-10-2021-1311

37.

Lin

Ling

(2021). The role of top-level supportive leadership: A multilevel, trickle-down, moderating effects test in Chinese hospitality and tourism firms. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 46, 104–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2020.11.013

38.

Mawritz

M. B.

Capitano

Greenbaum

R. L.

Bonner

J. M.

Kim

(2022). Development and validation of the workplace hazing scale. Human Relations, 75(1), 139–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726720957058

39.

Mawritz

M. B.

Dust

S. B.

Resick

C. J.

(2014). Hostile climate, abusive supervision, and employee coping: Does conscientiousness matter? Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(4), 737–747. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035863

40.

Meyer

E. S.

Mikulincer

Drory

(2018). Abusive supervision and its consequences in Israel: Immigration, seniority, and duration of relationship of supervisors and subordinates in the workplace. In A.

Stachowicz-Stanusch

Amann

(Eds.), Contemporary perspectives in corporate social performance and policy: The Middle Eastern perspective (pp. 201–221). Information Age Publishing. https://books.google.com/books?hl=zh-CN&lr=&id=KfQ-DwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=Contemporary+perspectives+in+corporate+social+performance+and+policy:+The+Middle+Eastern+perspective+&ots=N8yN0BkNWt&sig=AGh1dixk0GBMgYUo73aFIKTD3xA

41.

Mitchell

M. S.

Ambrose

M. L.

(2007). Abusive supervision and workplace deviance and the moderating effects of negative reciprocity beliefs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 1159–1168. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.1159

42.

Montani

Maoret

Dufour

(2019). The dark side of socialization: How and when divestiture socialization undermines newcomer outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(4), 506–521. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2351

43.

Nifadkar

S. S.

(2018). Filling in the “Blank Slate”: Examining newcomers’ schemas of supervisors during organizational socialization. Journal of Management, 46(5), 666–693. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318807288

44.

Park

I.-J.

Hai

Kim

P. B.

(2023). How capricious supervisors affect hospitality employees’ service performance? A diary study from the employees’ emotional perspective. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 47(8), 1371–1398. https://doi.org/10.1177/10963480221076782

45.

Peng

Matthews

(2020). Older and less deviant reactions to abusive supervision? A moderated mediation model of age and cognitive reappraisal. Work, Aging and Retirement, 6(3), 195–205. https://doi.org/10.1093/workar/waaa006

46.

Podsakoff

P. M.

MacKenzie

S. B.

Podsakoff

N. P.

(2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452

47.

Preacher

K. J.

Selig

J. P.

(2012). Advantages of Monte Carlo confidence intervals for indirect effects. Communication Methods and Measures, 6(2), 77–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2012.679848

48.

Priesemuth

Schminke

Ambrose

M. L.

Folger

(2014). Abusive supervision climate: A multiple-mediation model of its impact on group outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 57(5), 1513–1534. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0237

49.

Qin

Lee

T. J.

(2023). Unraveling abusive supervision climate in aircrew workplaces: The roles of temporary organizational features, trust, and gender dynamics. Behavioral Sciences, 13(8), 656. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13080656

50.

Qin

Yan

Lee

T. J.

(2025). Surviving in temporary aircrew workplaces: Coping with intermittent abusive supervision in dynamic supervisor–subordinate relationships. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 49(3), 498–512. https://doi.org/10.1177/10963480241237114

51.

Quratulain

Ahmad Al-Hawari

Bani-Melhem

(2024). The interactive effects of divestiture socialization and self-monitoring personality on newcomers’ authenticity, well-being, and creativity. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 66(3), 363–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/19389655241300467

52.

Ram

(2018). Hostility or hospitality? A review on violence, bullying and sexual harassment in the tourism and hospitality industry. Current Issues in Tourism, 21(7), 760–774. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2015.1064364

53.

Restubog

S. L. D.

Scott

K. L.

Zagenczyk

T. J.

(2011). When distress hits home: The role of contextual factors and psychological distress in predicting employees’ responses to abusive supervision. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(4), 713–729. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021593

54.

Siegel

J. L.

(2011). A multi-level model examining the effects of unit-level culture on abusive supervision [Doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona]. ProQuest. https://www.proquest.com/docview/912855709?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true&sourcetype=Dissertations%20&%20Theses

55.

Snethen

Van Puymbroeck

(2008). Girls and physical aggression: Causes, trends, and intervention guided by social learning theory. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 13(5), 346–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2008.05.003

56.

Taheri

Thompson

Mistry

T. G.

Okumus

Gannon

(2024). Abusive supervision in commercial kitchens: Insights from the restaurant industry. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 120, 103789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2024.103789

57.

Tang

Y. Y.

Tsaur

S. H.

(2016). Supervisory support climate and service-oriented organizational citizenship behavior in hospitality: The role of positive group affective tone. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 28(10), 2331–2349. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-09-2014-0432

58.

Tepper

B. J.

(2000). Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43(2), 178–190. https://doi.org/10.5465/1556375

59.

Tepper

B. J.

(2007). Abusive supervision in work organizations: Review, synthesis, and research agenda. Journal of Management, 33(3), 261–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307300812

60.

Touni

Kim

W. G.

Choi

H. M.

Ali

M. A.

(2020). Antecedents and an outcome of customer engagement with hotel brand community on Facebook. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 44(2), 278–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096348019895555

61.

Tyssen

A. K.

Wald

Spieth

(2013). Leadership in temporary organizations: A review of leadership theories and a research agenda. Project Management Journal, 44(6), 52–67. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21380

62.

Van Maanen

Schein

E. H.

(1977). Toward a theory of organizational socialization. In B. M.

Staw

(Ed.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 209–264). JAI Press. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/5175507_Toward_a_Theory_of_Organized_Socialization

63.

Xiao

Mao

J. Y.

(2022). Negative role modeling in hospitality organizations: A social learning perspective on supervisor and subordinate customer-targeted incivility. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 102, 103141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2022.103141

64.

Yan

Qin

Lee

T. J.

(2025). Reconceptualizing the dimensionality of abusive supervision in the Asian airline industry. International Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Administration. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/15256480.2025.2486452

65.

S. T.

(2022). It’s not just the victim: Bystanders’ emotional and behavioural reactions towards abusive supervision. Tourism Management, 91, 104506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2022.104506

66.

Kong

(2020). A systematic review of research on abusive supervision in hospitality and tourism. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 32(7), 2473–2496. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-12-2019-1004

67.

Yue

Wang

K. L.

Groth

(2022). It went downhill from there: The spillover effect from previous customer mistreatment on frontline employees’ service delivery. Journal of Service Research, 25(3), 478–493. https://doi.org/10.1177/10946705211049098

68.

Zhou

Wen

(2022). Why do hotel interns stay in the hospitality and tourism industry? An interactionist perspective of organizational socialization. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 34(3), 1225–1245. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-01-2021-0109

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.04 MB

How Divestiture Socialization Masks Intermittent Supervisory Abuse: A Multilevel Analysis in Ad-Hoc Aircrew Teams

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material