Abstract
Although revenue management studies suggest heuristics are applied when overriding revenue management system (RMS) recommendations, research has yet to explore the frequently used heuristics and their effects on hotel performance. This study first employed qualitative techniques to ascertain the frequently used heuristics—anchoring and overconfidence—in RMS overrides, and the reasons behind their prevalence. It then applied quantitative techniques to examine the effects of these heuristics on hotel performance, leveraging the insights from the qualitative findings to offer a nuanced understanding of the relationships. The qualitative insights reveal that anchoring is frequently used mainly because of the belief that the system can learn from the overrides. In contrast, the frequent use of overconfidence arises from the lack of transparency and trust in the RMSs' algorithms. The quantitative results indicate that overconfidence has a significant negative direct effect on performance, while the positive relationship between anchoring and performance is mediated by RMS override effectiveness.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
