Tourism live streaming (TLS) is an emerging integrated media and digital platform for real-time spatial–temporal synchronous interactions. This study presents a grounded theory analysis of TLS participants from Asia using interviews and facial expressions to construct and understand the relationship between TLS and psychological well-being. We found that participants’ psychological well-being consists of six dimensions: sentimental cultivation, environmental mastery, self and social identity, support of reality, inspiration and arousal, and self-transcendence. The mechanisms leading to the formation of psychological well-being are described and discussed. The study contributes to theorizing and understanding the constituents and mechanism of TLS for participants’ psychological well-being, an area that has been underexplored in the tourism literature. Practically, TLS is also regarded as an excellent means for businesses to enhance potential tourists’ perceptions and to accelerate their decision-making through image (re)construction and publicity.
BlieseP.EdwardsJ.SonnentagS. (2017). Stress and well-being at work: A century of empirical trends reflecting theoretical and societal influences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 389. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000109
CharmazK. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage Publications.
8.
ChenC.LinY. (2018). What drives live-stream usage intention? The perspectives of flow, entertainment, social interaction, and endorsement. Telematics and Informatics, 35(1), 293–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.12.003
9.
ClarkeV.BraunV. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. Sage Publications.
DanbyP.GrajfonerD. (2022). Human–equine tourism and nature-based solutions: Exploring psychological well-being through transformational experiences. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 46, 607–629. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096348020978555
14.
DeHaanC.HiraiT.RyanR. (2016). Nussbaum’s capabilities and self-determination theory’s basic psychological needs. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17(5), 2037–2049. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-015-9684-y
15.
DengZ.BenckendorffP.WangJ. (2019). Blended tourism experiencescape: A conceptualisation of live-streaming tourism. In PesonenJ.NeidhardtJ. (eds.), Information and communication technologies in tourism (pp. 212–222). Springer.
16.
DengZ.BenckendorffP.WangJ. (2021). Travel live streaming: An affordance perspective. Information Technology & Tourism, 23, 189–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40558-021-00199-1
17.
DenzinN.LincolnY. (2008). The landscape of qualitative research. Sage Publications.
GolanO.MartiniM. (2019). Religious live-streaming: Constructing the authentic in real time. Information, Communication & Society, 22(3), 437–454. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1395472
Hilvert-BruceZ.NeillJ.SjöblomM.HamariJ. (2018). Social motivations of live-streaming viewer engagement on Twitch. Computers in Human Behavior, 84, 58–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.02.013
25.
Imedia. (2021, November2). Douyin travel punch-in video reaches 700 million, and the number of views exceeds one trillion. China's "cloud" tourism development status and consumer portrait analysis. https://www.iimedia.cn/c1020/76518.html
26.
IvlevsA. (2017). Happy hosts? International tourist arrivals and residents’ subjective well-being in Europe. Journal of Travel Research, 56, 599–612. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287516662353
KhanA.BibiS.LyuJ.RazaA.HayatH.MeoM. (2020). Unraveling the nexuses of tourism, terrorism, and well-being. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 44, 974–1001. https://doi.org/10.1177/10963480209177
LewinskiP.Den UylT.ButlerC. (2014). Automated facial coding: Validation of basic emotions and FACS AUs in FaceReader. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics, 7(4), 227–236. https://doi.org/10.1037/npe0000028
34.
LiuH.WangM.WanH.LyuY.ZhuH. (2021). An empirical study on students’ academic wellbeing and sustainable development in live webcast classes. Sustainability, 13(2), 501. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020501
35.
LuJ.XiaoX.XuZ.WangC.ZhangM.ZhouY. (2022). The potential of virtual tourism in the recovery of tourism industry during the COVID-19 pandemic. Current Issues in Tourism, 25, 441–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2021.1959526
Rautiainen-KeskustaloT.RaudaskoskiS. (2019). Inclusion by live streaming? Contested meanings of well-being: Movement and non-movement of space, place and body. Mobilities, 14(4), 469–483. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2019.1612611
41.
RyanR.DeciE. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 141–166. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141
42.
RyffC.KeyesC. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(4), 719–727. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.719
43.
RyffC.SingerB. (2003). Ironies of the human condition: Well-being and health on the way to mortality. In AspinwallL.StaudingerU. (eds.), A psychology of human strengths (pp. 271–287). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10566-019
44.
RyffC.SingerB. (2008). Know thyself and become what you are: A eudaimonic approach to psychological well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(1), 13–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-006-9019-0
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1997). Grounded theory in practice. Sage Publications.
54.
TajfelH. (1981). Human groups and social categories. Cambridge University Press.
55.
Travel Daily. (2021, November3). Content-oriented development: Fliggy continues to increase the number of large-scale audiences by 20% for the second time (in Chinese). https://www.traveldaily.cn/article/147004
56.
TseD.NakamuraJ.CsikszentmihalyiM. (2021). Living well by “flowing” well: The indirect effect of autotelic personality on well-being through flow experience. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 16(3), 310–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2020.1716055
WaltersG.GillC.PhamL.FilepS. (2022). Virtual tourism experiences and mental restoration. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, OnlineFirst article. https://doi.org/10.1177/10963480221116047
60.
WangN. (1999). Rethinking authenticity in tourism experience. Annals of Tourism Research, 26, 349–370.
61.
WooE.UysalM.SirgyM. (2018). Tourism impact and stakeholders’ quality of life. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 42, 260–286. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096348016654971
62.
XiangZ.FesenmaierD.WerthnerH. (2021). Knowledge creation in information technology and tourism. Journal of Travel Research, 60, 1371–1376. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287520933669
63.
YiX.FuX.LinV.XiaoH. (2022). Integrating authenticity, well-being, and memorability in heritage tourism. Journal of Travel Research, 61, 378–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287520987624
64.
ZhangS.ChenN.HsuC. (2021). Facial expressions versus words: Unlocking complex emotional responses of residents toward tourists. Tourism Management, 83, Article 104226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2020.104226
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
