Abstract
Previous research has suggested that an informed choice maintains or increases loyalty as a result of causing customers to share the responsibility for service failures. The research, however, was only with risky choices— high payoff with high chance of service failure. For example, a table with a good view, but in demand and in a busy section, may have slow service. Does an informed choice maintain or increase loyalty when the alternative chosen is a conservative choice—low payoff with low chance of service failure? If the effect is because of empowerment alone, it should not extend to a conservative choice because the information indicated a low chance of failure. However, if the effect is also from a respect for disclosure the effect should extend because a failure outcome does not change the fact of disclosure. The studies, one in the lab and one in the field, test this suggestion.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
