Browder, D., Demchak, M., Heller, M., & King, D. ( 1989). An in vivo evaluation of the use of data-based rules to guide instructional decisions. Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 14(3), 234-240.
2.
Buysse, V., Winton, P., & Zimmerman, T. Eds. (2007). RTI goes to Pre-K: An early intervening system called recognition and response . Early Developments, 11, 6-10.
3.
Center forPersons With Disabilities at Utah State University. (2007-2008). Parenting Interactions With Children: Checklist of Observations Linked to Outcomes. Retrieved December 23, 2008, from http://www.cpd.usu.edu/project.php?id=119
4.
Coleman, M.R., Buysse, V., & Neitzel, J. ( 2006). Recognition and response: An early intervening system for young children at risk for learning disabilities. Chapel HillUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, FPG Child Development Institute.
5.
Early Childhood Research Institute on Measuring Growth and Development( 2000). Individual Growth and Development Indicators for preschool children: Rhyming/early literacy. Available online from Center for Early Education and Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Web site: http://www.ggg.umn.edu
6.
Finn, C.A., & Sladeczek, I.E. (2001). Assessing the social validity of behavioral interventions: A review of treatment acceptability measures . School Psychology Quarterly, 16, 176-206.
7.
Fuchs, L.S., & Fuchs, D. ( 1986). Effects of systematic formative evaluation: A meta-analysis . Exceptional Children, 53, 199-208.
8.
Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C.L., & Stecker, P.M. ( 1991). Effects of curriculum-based measurement and consultation on teacher planning and student achievement in mathematics operations. American Educational Research Journal, 28(3), 617-641.
9.
Godfrey, S.A., Grisham-Brown, J., Schuster, J.W., & Hemmeter, M.L. (2003). The effects of three techniques on student participation with preschool children with attending problems. Education and Treatment of Children, 26(3), 255-272.
10.
Gresham, F.M., & Lopez, M.F. ( 1996). Social validation: A unifying concept for school-based consultation research and practice. School Psychology Quarterly , 11, 204-227.
11.
Hojnoski, R.L., Gischlar, K.L., & Missall, K.N. (2009a). Improving child outcomes with data-based decision making: Collecting data . Young Exceptional Children, 12, 32-44.
Horner, R.H., Carr, E.G., Halle, J., McGee, G., Odom, S., & Wolery, M. ( 2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 165-179.
14.
Jenson, W.R., Clark, E., Kircher, J.C., & Kristjansson, S.D. (2007). Statistical reform: Evidence-based practice, meta-analyses, and single subject designs. Psychology in the Schools, 44, 483-493.
15.
Kazdin, A.E. ( 1982). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings. New York: Oxford University Press.
16.
Lane, K.L., Bocian, K.M., MacMillan, D.L., & Gresham F.M. ( 2004). Treatment integrity: An essential-but often forgotten-component of school-based interventions. Preventing School Failure, 48, 36-43.
17.
Peterson, P., Carta, J.J., & Greenwood, C.R. (2005). Teaching enhanced milieu language teaching skills to parents in multiple risk families. Journal of Early Intervention, 27(2), 94-109.
18.
Sandall, S.R., Schwartz, I.S., & LaCroix, B. ( 2004). Interventionists’ perspectives about data collection in integrated early childhood classrooms. Journal of Early Intervention, 26, 161-174.
19.
Tawney, J.W., & Gast, D.L. ( 1984). Single subject research in special education. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
20.
Taylor, R.L. ( 2003). Assessment of exceptional students: Educational and psychological procedures (6th ed.). Boston : Allyn and Bacon.
21.
Wolf, M.M. ( 1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement, or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 203-214.
