Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly praised for its superior performance compared with that of humans. Some firms now strategically adopt a “better-than-human” framing to promote their AI products. Across four experimental studies, the authors investigate consumer responses to this better-than-human framing and identify significant risks associated with the strategy. Specifically, presenting AI through a better-than-human frame can trigger existential concerns, as reminders of AI dominance evoke perceived threats to humanity. Given that many consumers already experience anxiety about AI's advancement, such better-than-human framing can intensify these fears—particularly among those high in general AI anxiety. However, recognizing that firms may continue to use this approach for strategic purposes, the authors develop and test an interventional message designed to accompany the better-than-human frame, aiming to mitigate perceived threats to humanity. The findings provide critical insights for AI marketing and communication, highlighting the need for nuanced messaging that balances AI performance signals with consumer reassurance.
AhluwaliaRohiniBurnkrantRobert E.UnnavaH. Rao (2000), “Consumer Response to Negative Publicity: The Moderating Role of Commitment,” Journal of Marketing Research, 37 (2), 203–14.
BeckwéMiekeDeroostNatachaKosterErnst H.W.De LissnyderEviDe RaedtRudi (2014), “Worrying and Rumination Are Both Associated with Reduced Cognitive Control,” Psychological Research, 78, 651–60.
ChaYoung-JaeBaekSojungAhnGraceLeeHyoungsukLeeBoyunShinJi-eunJangDayk (2020), “Compensating for the Loss of Human Distinctiveness: The Use of Social Creativity Under Human–Machine Comparisons,” Computers in Human Behavior, 103, 80–90.
DavenportThomasGuhaAbhijitGrewalDhruvBressgottTimna (2020), “How Artificial Intelligence Will Change the Future of Marketing,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48 (1), 24–42.
12.
DietvorstBerkeley J.SimmonsJoseph P.MasseyCade (2015), “Algorithm Aversion: People Erroneously Avoid Algorithms After Seeing Them Err,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144 (1), 114–26.
EstevaAndreKuprelBrettNovoaRoberto A.KoJustinSwetterSusan M.BlauHelen M.ThrunSebastian (2017), “Dermatologist-Level Classification of Skin Cancer with Deep Neural Networks,” Nature, 542 (7639), 115–18.
16.
European Commission Directorate-General for Communications Networks, Content, and Technology (2017), “Attitudes Towards the Impact of Digitisation and Automation on Daily Life: Report,” European Commission, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2759/835661.
EysselFriederikeKuchenbrandtDieta (2012), “Social Categorization of Social Robots: Anthropomorphism as a Function of Robot Group Membership,” British Journal of Social Psychology, 51 (4), 724–31.
19.
FengWentingTuRungtingLuTimZhouZhimin (2019), “Understanding Forced Adoption of Self-Service Technology: The Impacts of Users’ Psychological Reactance,” Behaviour & Information Technology, 38 (8), 820–32.
20.
FerrariFrancescoPaladinoMaria PaolaJettenJolanda (2016), “Blurring Human–Machine Distinctions: Anthropomorphic Appearance in Social Robots as a Threat to Human Distinctiveness,” International Journal of Social Robotics, 8, 287–302.
GranuloArminFuchsChristophPuntoniStefano (2019), “Psychological Reactions to Human Versus Robotic Job Replacement,” Nature Human Behaviour, 3 (10), 1062–69.
23.
GrossHellen P.IngerfurthStefanWillemsJurgen (2021), “Employees as Reputation Advocates: Dimensions of Employee Job Satisfaction Explaining Employees’ Recommendation Intention,” Journal of Business Research, 134, 405–13.
24.
HartmannJochenExnerYannickDomdeySamuel (2025), “The Power of Generative Marketing: Can Generative AI Create Superhuman Visual Marketing Content?” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 42 (1), 13–31.
25.
HaslamNickLoughnanStephenKashimaYoshihisaBainPaul (2008), “Attributing and Denying Humanness to Others,” European Review of Social Psychology, 19 (1), 55–85.
26.
HayesAndrew F. (2017), Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. Guilford Press.
27.
HollebeekLinda D.MenidjelChoukriSarstedtMarkoJanssonJohanUrbonaviciusSigitas (2024), “Engaging Consumers Through Artificially Intelligent Technologies: Systematic Review, Conceptual Model, and Further Research,” Psychology & Marketing, 41 (4), 880–98.
28.
HuangHsien-LongChengLi-KengSunPi-ChuanChouSzu-Jung (2021), “The Effects of Perceived Identity Threat and Realistic Threat on the Negative Attitudes and Usage Intentions Toward Hotel Service Robots: The Moderating Effect of the Robot’s Anthropomorphism,” International Journal of Social Robotics, 13, 1599–611.
29.
HuangMing-HuiRustRoland T. (2021a), “Engaged to a Robot? The Role of AI in Service,” Journal of Service Research, 24 (1), 30–41.
30.
HuangMing-HuiRustRoland T. (2021b), “A Strategic Framework for Artificial Intelligence in Marketing,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 49, 30–50.
31.
Ipsos (2024), “The Ipsos AI Monitor 2024: A 32-Country Ipsos Global Advisor Survey,” (June), https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/ct/news/documents/2024-06/Ipsos-AI-Monitor-2024-final-APAC.pdf.
32.
JarrahiMohammad Hossein (2018), “Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Work: Human-AI Symbiosis in Organizational Decision Making,” Business Horizons, 61 (4), 577–86.
33.
JohnsonDeborah G.VerdicchioMario (2017), “AI Anxiety,” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68 (9), 2267–70.
34.
JohnsonPalmer O.NeymanJerzy (1936), “Tests of Certain Linear Hypotheses and Their Application to Some Educational Problems,” Statistical Research Memoirs, 1, 57–93.
35.
JussupowEkaterinaSpohrerKaiHeinzlArmin (2022), “Identity Threats as a Reason for Resistance to Artificial Intelligence: Survey Study with Medical Students and Professionals,” JMIR Formative Research, 6 (3), e28750.
36.
KaplanFrédéric (2004), “Who Is Afraid of the Humanoid? Investigating Cultural Differences in the Acceptance of Robots,” International Journal of Humanoid Robotics, 1 (3), 465–80.
37.
KayaFeridunAydinFatihSchepmanAstridRodwayPaulYetişensoyOkanKayaMeva Demir (2022), “The Roles of Personality Traits, AI Anxiety, and Demographic Factors in Attitudes Toward Artificial Intelligence,” International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 40 (2), 497–514.
38.
KimTaejinLeeOne-Ki DanielKangJuyoung (2023), “Is It the Best for Barista Robots to Serve Like Humans? A Multidimensional Anthropomorphism Perspective,” International Journal of Hospitality Management, 108, 103358.
39.
KimTamiBaraszKateJohnLeslieNortonMichael I. (2019), “Calculators for Women: When Identity Appeals Provoke Backlash,” Harvard Business School Working Paper 19-086, https://www.hbs.edu/ris/Publication%20Files/19-086_f206b1d6-2355-445d-85d0-22fbe9a2b23a.pdf.
40.
KöchlingAlinaWehnerMarius Claus (2020), “Discriminated by an Algorithm: A Systematic Review of Discrimination and Fairness by Algorithmic Decision-Making in the Context of HR Recruitment and HR Development,” Business Research, 13, 795–848.
41.
LambrechtAnjaTuckerCatherine (2019), “Algorithmic Bias? An Empirical Study of Apparent Gender-Based Discrimination in the Display of STEM Career Ads,” Management Science, 65 (7), 2966–81.
42.
LeeKyoungmiKimHakkyunVohsKathleen D. (2011), “Stereotype Threat in the Marketplace: Consumer Anxiety and Purchase Intentions,” Journal of Consumer Research, 38 (2), 343–57.
43.
LeeNicol T.ResnickPaulBartonGenie (2019), “Algorithmic Bias Detection and Mitigation: Best Practices and Policies to Reduce Consumer Harms,” Brookings Institute (May 22), https://www.brookings.edu/articles/algorithmic-bias-detection-and-mitigation-best-practices-and-policies-to-reduce-consumer-harms/.
44.
LemayDavid J.BasnetRam B.DoleckTenzin (2020), “Fearing the Robot Apocalypse: Correlates of AI Anxiety,” International Journal of Learning Analytics and Artificial Intelligence for Education, 2 (2), 24–33.
45.
LiJianHuangJin-Song (2020), “Dimensions of Artificial Intelligence Anxiety Based on the Integrated Fear Acquisition Theory,” Technology in Society, 63, 101410.
46.
LiangYuhuaLeeSeungcheol Austin (2017), “Fear of Autonomous Robots and Artificial Intelligence: Evidence from National Representative Data with Probability Sampling,” International Journal of Social Robotics, 9 (3), 379–84.
47.
LongoniChiaraBonezziAndreaMorewedgeCarey K. (2019), “Resistance to Medical Artificial Intelligence,” Journal of Consumer Research, 46 (4), 629–50.
Méndez-SuárezMarianoDelbelloLucade Vega de UncetaAlejandroOrtega LarreaAna Lucia (2024), “Factors Affecting Consumers’ Attitudes Towards Artificial Intelligence,” Journal of Promotion Management, 30 (7), 1141–58.
50.
MillerClaire C. (2015), “Can an Algorithm Hire Better Than a Human,” New York Times (June 25), https://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/26/upshot/can-an-algorithm-hire-better-than-a-human.html.
51.
MilletKobeBuehlerFlorianDuGuanzhongKokkorisMichail D. (2023), “Defending Humankind: Anthropocentric Bias in the Appreciation of AI Art,” Computers in Human Behavior, 143, 107707.
52.
MirbabaieMiladBrünkerFelixMöllmann FrickNicholas R. J.StieglitzStefan (2022), “The Rise of Artificial Intelligence – Understanding the AI Identity Threat at the Workplace,” Electronic Markets, 32, 73–99.
53.
MishraSagarikaEwingMichael T.CooperHolly B. (2022), “Artificial Intelligence Focus and Firm Performance,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 50 (6), 1176–97.
54.
MontgomeryJacob M.NyhanBrendanTorresMichelle (2018), “How Conditioning on Posttreatment Variables Can Ruin Your Experiment and What to Do About It,” American Journal of Political Science, 62 (3), 760–75.
PaganiMargheritaWindYoram (2025), “Unlocking Marketing Creativity Using Artificial Intelligence,” Journal of Interactive Marketing, 60 (1), 1–24.
60.
PietersRik (2017), “Meaningful Mediation Analysis: Plausible Causal Inference and Informative Communication,” Journal of Consumer Research, 44 (3), 692–716.
61.
PrahlAndrewGohWen Pin (2021), “‘Rogue Machines’ and Crisis Communication: When AI Fails, How Do Companies Publicly Respond?” Public Relations Review, 47 (4), 102077.
62.
Replika (2026a), home page (accessed March 18, 2026), https://replika.com/.
RussellCristel A. (1998), “Toward a Framework of Product Placement: Theoretical Propositions,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 25, AlbaJoseph W.Wesley HutchinsonJ., eds. Association for Consumer Research, 599–600.
65.
RussellStuart J.NorvigPeter (2010), Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. Prentice Hall.
66.
SchepmanAstridRodwayPaul (2020), “Initial Validation of the General Attitudes Towards Artificial Intelligence Scale,” Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 1, 100014.
SpillerStephen A.FitzsimonsGavan J.LynchJohn G.Jr.McClellandGary H. (2013), “Spotlights, Floodlights, and the Magic Number Zero: Simple Effects Tests in Moderated Regression,” Journal of Marketing Research, 50 (2), 277–88.
69.
SrinivasanRajiSarial-AbiGülen (2021), “When Algorithms Fail: Consumers’ Responses to Brand Harm Crises Caused by Algorithm Errors,” Journal of Marketing, 85 (5), 74–91.
StephanWalter G.RenfroC. LausanneDavisMark D. (2008), “The Role of Threat in Intergroup Relations,” in Improving Intergroup Relations: Building on the Legacy of Thomas F. Pettigrew. Blackwell, 55–72.
72.
SuLujunJiaBocongHuangYinghua (2022), “How Do Destination Negative Events Trigger Tourists’ Perceived Betrayal and Boycott? The Moderating Role of Relationship Quality,” Tourism Management, 92, 104536.
TsaiWan-Hsiu S. (2011), “How Minority Consumers Use Targeted Advertising as Pathways to Self-Empowerment: Gay Men’s and Lesbians’ Reading of Out-of-the-Closet Advertising,” Journal of Advertising, 40 (3), 85–98.
75.
TullyStephanieLongoniChiaraAppelGil (2025), “Lower Artificial Intelligence Literacy Predicts Greater AI Receptivity,” Journal of Marketing, 89 (5), 1–20.
WardAdrian F.OlsenAndrew S.WegnerDaniel M. (2013), “The Harm-Made Mind: Observing Victimization Augments Attribution of Minds to Vegetative Patients, Robots, and the Dead,” Psychological Science, 24 (8), 1437–45.
78.
WaytzAdamNortonMichael I. (2014), “Botsourcing and Outsourcing: Robot, British, Chinese, and German Workers Are for Thinking—Not Feeling—Jobs,” Emotion, 14 (2), 434–44.
WischmeyerThomas (2020), “Artificial Intelligence and Transparency: Opening the Black Box,” in Regulating Artificial Intelligence, WischmeyerThomasRademacherTimo, eds. Springer, 75–101.
81.
WoodruffAllisonFoxSarah E.Rousso-SchindlerStevenWarshawJeffrey (2018), “A Qualitative Exploration of Perceptions of Algorithmic Fairness,” in Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, 656.
YogeeswaranKumarZłotowskiJakubLivingstoneMeganBartneckChristophSumiokaHidenobuIshiguroHiroshi (2016), “The Interactive Effects of Robot Anthropomorphism and Robot Ability on Perceived Threat and Support for Robotics Research,” Journal of Human-Robot Interaction, 5 (2), 29–47.
84.
ZhangShunyuanMehtaNitinSinghParam VirSrinivasanKannan (2021), “Can an Artificial Intelligence Algorithm Mitigate Racial Economic Inequality? An Analysis in the Context of Airbnb,” Marketing Science, 40 (5), 813–20.
85.
ZhangYeÖzsomerAyşegülGürhan CanlıZeynepBaghirovFakhri (2025), “Artificial Intelligence Chatbots Versus Human Agents in Customer Satisfaction: The Role of Warmth and Competence,” Journal of Interactive Marketing (published online July 29), https://doi.org/10.1177/10949968251366265.
86.
ZłotowskiJakubYogeeswaranKumarBartneckChristoph (2017), “Can We Control It? Autonomous Robots Threaten Human Identity, Uniqueness, Safety, and Resources,” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 100, 48–54.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
