Electronic word of mouth (eWOM) can inform consumers’ decisions, but do older consumers (i.e., those age 65 and older) respond to eWOM in the same way as younger ones? If not, what underlying factors contribute to this difference, and what strategies can be implemented to encourage older consumers to utilize this accessible and useful information source in their decision-making? Answering these questions is crucial given the global increase in the aging population and the growing shift toward digitalization. Three studies examine this phenomenon. Study 1 reveals a negative association between age and eWOM persuasion, so that, as consumers age, they tend to be less persuaded by eWOM. However, drawing on aging literature and self-control theory, Studies 2 and 3 demonstrate that situationally inducing older consumers to feel younger, through instructions or communication cues, increases their perceived sense of control, and ultimately results in greater eWOM persuasion. These findings expand the literature at the intersection of aging, sense of control, and eWOM by identifying perceived youthfulness and sense of control as determinants of eWOM persuasion among older consumers. They also provide marketers and policymakers with actionable insights on how to facilitate older consumers’ use of eWOM, while keeping in mind potential ethical considerations.
AmatulliCesarePelusoAlessandro M.GuidoGianluigiYoonCarolyn (2018), “When Feeling Younger Depends on Others: The Effects of Social Cues on Older Consumers,” Journal of Consumer Research, 45 (4), 691–709.
2.
AndersonCameronGalinskyAdam D. (2006), “Power, Optimism, and Risk-Taking,” European Journal of Social Psychology, 36 (4), 511–36.
3.
Babić RosarioAnaDe ValckKristineSotgiuFrancesca (2020), “Conceptualizing the Electronic Word-of-Mouth Process: What We Know and Need to Know About eWOM Creation, Exposure, and Evaluation,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48 (3), 422–48.
4.
BatesonJohn E.G. (1985), “Perceived Control and the Service Encounter,” in The Service Encounter: Managing Employee/Customer Interaction in Service Business, CzepielJohn A.SolomonMichael R.SurprenantCarol F., eds. Lexington, 67–82.
5.
BergerJonahIyengarRaghuram (2013), “Communication Channels and Word of Mouth: How the Medium Shapes the Message,” Journal of Consumer Research, 40 (3), 567–79.
6.
BergkvistLarsRossiterJohn R. (2007), “The Predictive Validity of Multiple-Item Versus Single-Item Measures of the Same Constructs,” Journal of Marketing Research, 44, 175–84.
7.
BrownJoBroderickAmanda J.LeeNick (2007), “Word of Mouth Communication Within Online Communities: Conceptualizing the Online Social Network,” Journal of Interactive Marketing, 21 (3), 2–20.
8.
BuiHien Thu (2022), “Exploring and Explaining Older Consumers’ Behaviour in the Boom of Social Media,” International Journal of Consumer Studies, 46 (2), 601–20.
9.
ChenCharlene Y.LeeLeonardYapAndy J. (2017), “Control Deprivation Motivates Acquisition of Utilitarian Products,” Journal of Consumer Research, 43 (6), 1031–47.
10.
CianLucaLongoniChiaraKrishnaAradhna (2020), “Advertising a Desired Change: When Process Simulation Fosters (vs. Hinders) Credibility and Persuasion,” Journal of Marketing Research, 57 (3), 489–508.
11.
ConsiglioIreneDe AngelisMatteoCostabileMichele (2018), “The Effect of Social Density on Word of Mouth,” Journal of Consumer Research, 45 (3), 511–28.
12.
DroletAimeeYoonCarolyn (2021), The Aging Consumer: Perspectives from Psychology and Marketing. Routledge.
13.
EastRobertHammondKathyWrightMalcolm (2007), “The Relative Incidence of Positive and Negative Word of Mouth: A Multi-Category Study,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 24, 175–84.
14.
EastRobertUnclesMark D.LomaxWendy (2014), “Hear Nothing, Do Nothing: The Role of Word of Mouth in the Decision-Making of Older Consumers,” Journal of Marketing Management, 30 (7–8), 786–801.
15.
EelenJiskaÖzturanPerenVerleghPeeter W.J. (2017), “The Differential Impact of Brand Loyalty on Traditional and Online Word of Mouth: The Moderating Roles of Self-Brand Connection and the Desire to Help the Brand,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 34 (4), 872–91.
16.
FlynnLeisa ReineckeGoldsmithRonald E. (1999), “A Short, Reliable Measure of Subjective Knowledge,” Journal of Business Research, 46 (1), 57–66.
17.
FrancoPaolo (2020), “Empowering the Independence of Older People with Everyday Technologies,” in Measuring, Understanding and Improving Wellbeing Among Older People, ChurchillSefa A.FarrellLisaAppauSamuelson, eds. Palgrave MacMillan, 15–39.
18.
FrancoPaolo (2023), “Older Consumers and Technology: A Critical Systematic Literature Review,” AMS Review, 13 (1), 92–121.
19.
GalinskyAdam D.GruenfeldDeborah H.MageeJoe C. (2003), “From Power to Action,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85 (3), 453–66.
20.
GhasemaghaeiMaryamHassaneinKhaledBenbasatIzak (2019), “Assessing the Design Choices for Online Recommendation Agents for Older Adults: Older Does Not Always Mean Simpler Information Technology,” MIS Quarterly, 43 (1), 329–46.
21.
GuidoGianluigiAmatulliCesarePelusoAlessandro M. (2014), “Context Effects on Older Consumers’ Cognitive Age,” Psychology and Marketing, 31 (2), 103–14.
22.
GuiotDenis (2001), “Antecedents of Subjective Age Biases Among Senior Women,” Psychology and Marketing, 18 (10), 1049–71.
23.
HayesAndrew F. (2022), Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. Guilford Press.
24.
HeckhausenJuttaFarruggiaSusan P. (2003), “Developmental Regulation Across the Life Span: A Control-Theory Approach and Implications for Secondary Education,” in BJEP Monograph Series II, Part 2: Development and Motivation, Vol. 85 (102), SmithLeslieRogersColinTomlinsonPeter, eds. British Psychological Society, 85–102.
25.
HeckhausenJuttaSchulzRichard (1995), “A Life-Span Theory of Control,” Psychological Review, 102 (2), 284–304.
26.
HeckhausenJuttaWroschCarstenSchulzRichard (2010), “A Motivational Theory of Life-Span Development,” Psychological Review, 117 (1), 32–60.
27.
HermannErikPuntoniStefano (2025), “Generative AI in Marketing and Principles for Ethical Design and Deployment,” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 44 (3), 332–49.
28.
HubleyAnita M.HultschDavid F. (1994), “The Relationship of Personality Trait Variables to Subjective Age Identity in Older Adults,” Research on Aging, 16 (4), 415–39.
29.
HuiMichael K.BatesonJohn E.G. (1991), “Perceived Control and the Effects of Crowding and Consumer Choice on the Service Experience,” Journal of Consumer Research, 18 (9), 174–84.
30.
HungShiu-WanChangChe-WeiChenSsu-Yu (2023), “Beyond a Bunch of Reviews: The Quality and Quantity of Electronic Word-of-Mouth,” Information & Management, 60 (3), 103777.
31.
IyerPramodYazdanparastAtefehStruttonDavid (2017), “Examining the Effectiveness of WOM/eWOM Communications Across Age-Based Cohorts: Implications for Political Marketers,” Journal of Consumer Marketing, 34 (7), 646–63.
32.
IyerRajeshGriffinMitch (2021), “Modeling Word-of-Mouth Usage: A Replication,” Journal of Business Research, 126, 512–23.
KingRobert AllenRacherlaPradeepBushVictoria D. (2014), “What We Know and Don’t Know About Online Word-of-Mouth: A Review and Synthesis of the Literature,” Journal of Interactive Marketing, 28 (3), 167–83.
35.
KooijDorienDe LangeAnnetJansenPaulDikkersJosje (2008), “Older Workers’ Motivation to Continue to Work: Five Meanings of Age: A Conceptual Review,” Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23 (4), 364–94.
36.
KornadtAnna E.HessThomas M.VossPeggyRothermundKlaus (2018), “Subjective Age Across the Life Span: A Differentiated, Longitudinal Approach,” Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 73 (5), 767–77.
37.
KöttlHannaGallistlVeraRohnerRebekkaAyalonLiat (2021), “‘But at the Age of 85? Forget It!’: Internalized Ageism, a Barrier to Technology Use,” Journal of Aging Studies, 59, 100971.
38.
LachmanMargie E.FirthKimberly M. (2004), “The Adaptive Value of Feeling in Control During Midlife,” in How Healthy Are We? A National Study of Well-Being at Midlife, BrimOrville G.RyffCarol D.KesslerRonald C., eds. University of Chicago Press, 320–49.
39.
LachmanMargie E.WeaverSuzanne L. (1998), “The Sense of Control as a Moderator of Social Class Differences in Health and Well-Being,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74 (3), 763–73.
40.
LangFrieder R.HeckhausenJutta (2001), “Perceived Control over Development and Subjective Well-Being: Differential Benefits Across Adulthood,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81 (3), 509–23.
41.
LeeDaniel ChaeinKimJungkeun (2024), “Feeling Younger and Acting Greener: The Impact of Subjective Age on Sustainable Consumption,” Psychology and Marketing, 41 (10), 2310–28.
42.
LópezManuelaSiciliaMaria (2011), “The Impact of e-WOM: Determinants of Influence,” in Advances in Advertising Research, Vol. 2, Breaking New Ground in Theory and Practice, OkazakiShintaro, ed. Springer, 215–30.
43.
MaibergerTobiasSchindlerDavidKoschate-FischerNicole (2024), “Let’s Face It: When and How Facial Emojis Increase the Persuasiveness of Electronic Word of Mouth,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 52 (1), 119–39.
44.
MirowskyJohn (1995), “Age and the Sense of Control,” Social Psychology Quarterly, 58 (1), 31–43.
45.
MurphyDallas J.PorterMichelle M.MackenzieCorey S.ChipperfieldJudith G. (2025), “Development, Feasibility, and Acceptability of a Process Based Intervention to Decrease Internalized Ageism,” Gerontology & Geriatrics Education, 46 (1), 115–30.
46.
NelsonTodd D. (2010), “Ageism: The Strange Case of Prejudice Against the Older You,” in Disability and Aging Discrimination: Perspectives in Law and Psychology. Springer, 37–47.
47.
NeyEmilieFischweicherPriva (2021), “The Relationship Between Locus of Control, Self-Efficacy, and Entitlement in the United States,” Interdisciplinary Journal of Sociality Studies, 1, 24–36.
PackardGrantBergerJonah (2017), “How Language Shapes Word of Mouth’s Impact,” Journal of Marketing Research, 54 (4), 572–88.
50.
PageTom (2014), “Touchscreen Mobile Devices and Older Adults,” International Journal of Human Factors and Ergonomics, 3 (1), 65–85.
51.
PelusoAlessandro M.AmatulliCesareYoonCarolynGuidoGianluigi (2021), “Subjective Age and Older Consumers,” in The Aging Consumer: Perspectives from Psychology and Marketing, DroletAimeeYoonCarolyn, eds. Routledge, 237–58.
52.
PopulationPyramid (2025), “Population Pyramids of the World from 1950 to 2100,” (accessed June 9, 2025), https://www.populationpyramid.net/.
53.
RodinJudith (1986), “Aging and Health: Effects of the Sense of Control,” Science, 233, 1271–76.
54.
RossMichaelGrossmannIgorSchryerEmily (2014), “Contrary to Psychological and Popular Opinion, There Is No Compelling Evidence That Older Adults Are Disproportionately Victimized by Consumer Fraud,” Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9 (4), 427–42.
55.
RoyGobindaBasuRituparnaRaySamudyuti (2023), “Antecedents of Online Purchase Intention Among Ageing Consumers,” Global Business Review, 24 (5), 1041–57.
56.
ŞarAli HaydarAvcuRamazanIşıklarAbdullah (2010), “Analyzing Undergraduate Students’ Self Confidence Levels in Terms of Some Variables,” Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5, 1205–09.
57.
SchiemanScottTurnerHeather A. (1998), “Age, Disability and the Sense of Mastery,” Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 39 (3), 169–86.
58.
ShippAbbie J.EdwardsJeffrey R.LambertLisa Schurer (2009), “Conceptualization and Measurement of Temporal Focus: The Subjective Experience of the Past, Present, and Future,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 110 (1), 1–22.
59.
SkinnerEllen A. (1996), “A Guide to Constructs of Control,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71 (3), 549–70.
60.
SpencerSteven J.LogelChristineDaviesPaul G. (2016), “Stereotype Threat,” Annual Review of Psychology, 67 (1), 415–37.
61.
TentoriKatyaOshersonDanielHasherLynnMayCynthia (2001), “Wisdom and Aging: Irrational Preferences in College Students but Not Older Adults,” Cognition, 81 (3), B87–B96.
62.
ThomasAyanna K.DuboisStacey J. (2011), “Reducing the Burden of Stereotype Threat Eliminates Age Differences in Memory Distortion,” Psychological Science, 22 (12), 1515–17.
63.
Touré-TilleryMaferimaMcGillAnn L. (2015), “Who or What to Believe: Trust and the Differential Persuasiveness of Human and Anthropomorphized Messengers,” Journal of Marketing, 79 (4), 94–110.
64.
Von HelversenBettinaAbramczukKatarzynaKopećWiesławNielekRadoslaw (2018), “Influence of Consumer Reviews on Online Purchasing Decisions in Older and Younger Adults,” Decision Support Systems, 113, 1–10.
65.
WardJames C.BarnesJohn W. (2001), “Control and Affect: The Influence of Feeling in Control of the Retail Environment on Affect, Involvement, Attitude, and Behavior,” Journal of Business Research, 54 (2), 139–44.
66.
WeissDavidLangFrieder R. (2012), “‘They’ Are Old but ‘I’ Feel Younger: Age-Group Dissociation as a Self- Protective Strategy in Old Age,” Psychology and Aging, 27 (1), 153–63.
67.
Wilson-NashCarolynPavlopoulouIsmini (2024), “Nostalgia and Negotiation: The Electronic Word-of-Mouth and Social Well-Being of Older Consumers,” Psychology and Marketing, 41 (3), 532–46.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
