This study investigates factors affecting users’ review behavior on electronic word-of-mouth platforms, with a focus on the motivating influence of friends’ review contributions. Drawing on the theory of competitive altruism, the authors analyze how users perceive reputation-related competition on a platform. They additionally identify attributes related to friends, users, and companies that influence users’ review contributions. The authors obtained data from Yelp and constructed a data set of more than two million user–restaurant–week triads for analysis. The findings suggest that amateur friends’ reviews more strongly affect a user's likelihood of reviewing than expert friends’ reviews. In addition, users who have gained expert status are less influenced by their friends’ reviews than amateur users. As users’ review experience and social reach increase, the roles of friends’ reviews diminish when a person has a lower status than their friends. Moreover, the motivations stay focused on the reviewed company and do not spill over to other companies even when the motivations are recurring and prolonged. Following expert friends leads to user reviews that are more readable. Competing with low-status friends can afford users a reputational advantage particularly when these users have a higher status.
AndreoniJames (2007), “Giving Gifts to Groups: How Altruism Depends on the Number of Recipients,” Journal of Public Economics, 91 (9), 1731–49.
2.
AralSinanMuchnikLevSundararajanArun (2009), “Distinguishing Influence-Based Contagion from Homophily-Driven Diffusion in Dynamic Networks,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106 (51), 21544–49.
3.
Babić RosarioAnade ValckKristineSotgiuFrancesca (2020), “Conceptualizing the Electronic Word-of-Mouth Process: What We Know and Need to Know About eWOM Creation, Exposure, and Evaluation,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48 (3), 422–48.
4.
BanerjeeShankhadeepBhattacharyyaSamadritaBoseIndranil (2017), “Whose Online Reviews to Trust? Understanding Reviewer Trustworthiness and Its Impact on Business,” Decision Support Systems, 96, 17–26.
5.
BarclayPatWillerRobb (2006), “Partner Choice Creates Competitive Altruism in Humans,” Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 274 (1610), 749–53.
6.
BotelhoTristan L.GertsbergMarina (2022), “The Disciplining Effect of Status: Evaluator Status Awards and Observed Gender Bias in Evaluations,” Management Science, 68 (7), 5311–29.
7.
ChengYi-HsiuHoHui-Yi (2015), “Social Influence’s Impact on Reader Perceptions of Online Reviews,” Journal of Business Research, 68 (4), 883–87.
8.
CheungChristy M.K.LeeMatthew K.O. (2012), “What Drives Consumers to Spread Electronic Word of Mouth in Online Consumer-Opinion Platforms,” Decision Support Systems, 53 (1), 218–25.
9.
Costa PintoDiegoHerterMárcia MaurerRossiPatríciaNiqueWalter MeucciBorgesAdilson (2019), “Recycling Cooperation and Buying Status: Effects of Pure and Competitive Altruism on Sustainable Behaviors,” European Journal of Marketing, 53 (5), 944–71.
FangBinYeQiangKucukustaDenizLawRob (2016), “Analysis of the Perceived Value of Online Tourism Reviews: Influence of Readability and Reviewer Characteristics,” Tourism Management, 52, 498–506.
12.
FaulkLewisJohnsonJasmine McGinnisLecyJesse D. (2017), “Competitive Advantage in Nonprofit Grant Markets: Implications of Network Embeddedness and Status,” International Public Management Journal, 20 (2), 261–93.
13.
GoesPaulo B.GuoChenhuiLinMingfeng (2016), “Do Incentive Hierarchies Induce User Effort? Evidence from an Online Knowledge Exchange,” Information Systems Research, 27 (3), 497–516.
14.
GoesPaulo B.LinMingfengAu YeungChing-man (2014), “Popularity Effect in User-Generated Content: Evidence from Online Product Reviews,” Information Systems Research, 25 (2), 222–38.
HardyCharlie L.Van VugtMark (2006), “Nice Guys Finish First: The Competitive Altruism Hypothesis,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32 (10), 1402–13.
17.
HeShuPengJingLiJianbinXuLiping (2020), “Impact of Platform Owner’s Entry on Third-Party Stores,” Information Systems Research, 31 (4), 1467–84.
18.
HerrmannEstherEngelmannJan M.TomaselloMichael (2019), “Children Engage in Competitive Altruism,” Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 179, 176–89.
19.
HopkinsEd (2014), “Competitive Altruism, Mentalizing, and Signaling,” American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 6 (4), 272–92.
20.
HungShin-YuanDurcikovaAlexandraLaiHui-MinLinWan-Mei (2011), “The Influence of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation on Individuals’ Knowledge Sharing Behavior,” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 69 (6), 415–27.
21.
HuntShelby D.MorganRobert M. (1995), “The Comparative Advantage Theory of Competition,” Journal of Marketing, 59 (2), 1–15.
22.
IzogoErnest EmekaMpinganjiraMercyKarjaluotoHeikkiLiuHongfei (2022), “Examining the Impact of eWOM-Triggered Customer-to-Customer Interactions on Travelers’ Repurchase and Social Media Engagement,” Journal of Travel Research, 61 (8), 1872–94.
23.
KaySamanthaMulcahyRoryParkinsonJoy (2020), “When Less Is More: The Impact of Macro and Micro Social Media Influencers’ Disclosure,” Journal of Marketing Management, 36 (3–4), 248–78.
24.
KeZhihongLiuDeBrassDaniel J. (2020), “Do Online Friends Bring Out the Best in Us? The Effect of Friend Contributions on Online Review Provision,” Information Systems Research, 31 (4), 1322–36.
25.
KimSu JungZhouYayuMalthouseEdward C.HessaryYasaman Kamyab (2021), “In Search for an Audience-Supported Business Model for Local Newspapers: Findings from Clickstream and Subscriber Data,” Digital Journalism (published online July 21, 2021), https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1948347.
26.
KingGaryZengLangche (2001), “Logistic Regression in Rare Events Data,” Political Analysis, 9 (2), 137–63.
27.
KorfiatisNikolaosGarcía-BariocanalElenaSánchez-AlonsoSalvador (2012), “Evaluating Content Quality and Helpfulness of Online Product Reviews: The Interplay of Review Helpfulness vs. Review Content,” Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 11 (3), 205–17.
28.
LampelJosephBhallaAjay (2007), “The Role of Status Seeking in Online Communities: Giving the Gift of Experience,” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12 (2), 434–55.
29.
LeeYoung-JinHosanagarKartikTanYong (2015), “Do I Follow My Friends or the Crowd? Information Cascades in Online Movie Ratings,” Management Science, 61 (9), 2241–58.
30.
LiuXianweiZhangZiliLawRobZhangZiqiong (2019), “Posting Reviews on OTAs: Motives, Rewards and Effort,” Tourism Management, 70, 230–37.
31.
LoAda S.YaoSharon Siyu (2019), “What Makes Hotel Online Reviews Credible? An Investigation of the Roles of Reviewer Expertise, Review Rating Consistency and Review Valence,” International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 31 (1), 41–60.
32.
MathwickCharlaMostellerJill (2017), “Online Reviewer Engagement: A Typology Based on Reviewer Motivations,” Journal of Service Research, 20 (2), 204–18.
33.
MullerDominiqueFayantMarie-Pierre (2010), “On Being Exposed to Superior Others: Consequences of Self-Threatening Upward Social Comparisons,” Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4 (8), 621–34.
34.
NaujoksAnnaBenkensteinMartin (2020), “Who Is Behind the Message? The Power of Expert Reviews on eWOM Platforms,” Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 44 (November–December), 101015.
35.
NguyenPeterWangXin (Shane)LiXiCotteJune (2021), “Reviewing Experts’ Restraint from Extremes and Its Impact on Service Providers,” Journal of Consumer Research, 47 (5), 654–74.
36.
Ottoni-WilhelmMarkVesterlundLiseXieHuan (2017), “Why Do People Give? Testing Pure and Impure Altruism,” American Economic Review, 107 (11), 3617–33.
37.
ParikhAnish A.BehnkeCarlNelsonDougVorvoreanuMihaelaAlmanzaBarbara (2015), “A Qualitative Assessment of Yelp.Com Users’ Motivations to Submit and Read Restaurant Reviews,” Journal of Culinary Science & Technology, 13 (1), 1–18.
QiuLiangfeiKumarSubodha (2017), “Understanding Voluntary Knowledge Provision and Content Contribution Through a Social-Media-Based Prediction Market: A Field Experiment,” Information Systems Research, 28 (3), 529–46.
40.
QiuLiangfeiWhinstonAndrew B. (2017), “Pricing Strategies Under Behavioral Observational Learning in Social Networks,” Production and Operations Management, 26 (7), 1249–67.
41.
ShenWenqiHuYu JeffreyUlmerJackie Rees (2015), “Competing for Attention: An Empirical Study of Online Reviewers’ Strategic Behavior,” MIS Quarterly, 39 (3), 683–96.
42.
SlonimRobert L. (2005), “Competing Against Experienced and Inexperienced Players,” Experimental Economics, 8 (1), 55–75.
43.
TellisGerard J.MacInnisDeborah J.TirunillaiSeshadriZhangYanwei (2019), “What Drives Virality (Sharing) of Online Digital Content? The Critical Role of Information, Emotion, and Brand Prominence,” Journal of Marketing, 83 (4), 1–20.
44.
TriversRobert L. (1971), “The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism,” Quarterly Review of Biology, 46 (1), 35–57.
45.
Van de VenWynand P.M.M.Van PraagBernard M.S. (1981), “The Demand for Deductibles in Private Health Insurance: A Probit Model with Sample Selection,” Journal of Econometrics, 17 (2), 229–52.
46.
Van HoyeGreetLievensFilip (2009), “Tapping the Grapevine: A Closer Look at Word-of-Mouth as a Recruitment Source,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 94 (2), 341–52.
47.
Van VugtMarkRobertsGilbertHardyCharlie (2007), “Competitive Altruism: A Theory of Reputation-Based Cooperation in Groups,” in Oxford Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology, BarrettLouiseDunbarRobin, eds. Oxford University Press,531–40.
48.
WangChongZhangXiaoquanHannIl-Horn (2018), “Socially Nudged: A Quasi-Experimental Study of Friends’ Social Influence in Online Product Ratings,” Information Systems Research, 29 (3), 641–55.
49.
WarnekenFelixTomaselloMichael (2009), “The Roots of Human Altruism,” British Journal of Psychology, 100 (3), 455–71.
50.
WuPhilip Fei (2019), “Motivation Crowding in Online Product Reviewing: A Qualitative Study of Amazon Reviewers,” Information & Management, 56 (8), 103163.
51.
YangHaiyangChattopadhyayAmitava (2023), “Motivation to Compete: Understanding and Overcoming the Demotivating Effect of Competing with More People,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 33 (2), 328–45.
52.
YangMochenRenYuqingAdomaviciusGediminas (2019), “Understanding User-Generated Content and Customer Engagement on Facebook Business Pages,” Information Systems Research, 30 (3), 839–55.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
