Consumers experiencing financial vulnerability often face multiple intersecting barriers to well-being. Accordingly, social service systems have begun integrating programs to more holistically address the many factors affecting financial vulnerability. Results from a qualitative case study show how an integrated approach to financial vulnerability influences consumer experiences as they navigate through social service systems. Findings explain how initiation into social service systems requires adequate client readiness to comply with entry conditions placed by service providers. Furthermore, while many organizations believe readiness must be attained prior to entering the system, we find that a network of internal and external providers can support the cocreation of client readiness. Integration into the system deepens as clients take on structured responsibilities, as providers take on risks in supporting clients through vulnerabilities, and as both clients and providers develop mutual trust. The authors introduce the concept of contingent value propositions to explain how providers can structure services to make support available based on client readiness and cocreative action. Client transitions through the service system can be hindered or supported by integration with external partners. Implications for social service theory and practice are discussed, including recommendations for delivering holistic social service support to consumers experiencing financial vulnerability.
BakerStacey MenzelGentryJames W.RittenburgTerri L. (2005), “Building Understanding of the Domain of Consumer Vulnerability,” Journal of Macromarketing, 25 (2), 128–39.
2.
BenartziShlomoThalerRichard H. (2013), “Behavioral Economics and the Retirement Savings Crisis,” Science, 339 (6124), 1152–53.
3.
BreidbachChristoph F.AntonsDavidSalgeTorsten Oliver (2016), “Seamless Service? On the Role and Impact of Service Orchestrators in Human-Centered Service Systems,” Journal of Service Research, 19 (4), 458–76.
4.
BurawoyMichael (1998), “The Extended Case Method,” Sociological Theory, 16 (1), 4–33.
5.
ChandlerJennifer D.LuschRobert F. (2015), “Service Systems: A Broadened Framework and Research Agenda on Value Propositions, Engagement, and Service Experience,” Journal of Service Research, 18 (1), 6–22.
6.
DongBeibeiSivakumarK.EvansKenneth R.ZouShaoming (2015), “Effect of Customer Participation on Service Outcomes: The Moderating Role of Participation Readiness,” Journal of Service Research, 18 (2), 160–76.
7.
EisenhardtKathleen M. (1989), “Building Theories from Case Study Research,” Academy of Management Review, 14 (4), 532–50.
8.
EmersonRobert M.FretzRachel I.ShawLinda L. (2011), Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
9.
FiskRaymond P.DeanAlison M.AlkireLindaJoubertAlisonPreviteJosephineRobertsonNicholaRosenbaumMark Scott (2018), “Design for Service Inclusion: Creating Inclusive Service Systems by 2050,” Journal of Service Management, 29 (5), 834–58.
10.
GibsonKerriO'DonnellSusanRideoutVanda (2007), “The Project-Funding Regime: Complications for Community Organizations and Their Staff,” Canadian Public Administration, 50 (3), 411–36.
11.
GioiaDennis A.CorleyKevin G.HamiltonAimee L. (2013), “Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research: Notes on the Gioia Methodology,” Organizational Research Methods, 16 (1), 15–31.
12.
GlaserBarneyStraussAnselm (1967), The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: Aldine Publishing Company.
13.
GreilArthur LRudyDavid R. (1983), “Conversion to the World View of Alcoholics Anonymous: A Refinement of Conversion Theory,” Qualitative Sociology, 6 (1), 5–28.
HongPhilip Young P.WathenMaria V.ShinAlanna J.YoonIntaeParkJang Ho (2022), “Psychological Self-Sufficiency and Financial Literacy among Low-Income Participants: An Empowerment-Based Approach to Financial Capability,” Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 43 (4), 690–702.
16.
JaakkolaElinaAlexanderMatthew (2014), “The Role of Customer Engagement Behavior in Value Co-Creation: A Service System Perspective, Journal of Service Research, 17 (3), 247–61.
17.
KoppenhaferLeslieScottKristinWeaverToddMulderMark (2023), “The Service Empowerment Model: A Collaborative Approach to Reducing Vulnerability,” Journal of Services Marketing, 37 (7), 911–26.
18.
MartinKelly DHillRonald Paul (2015), “Saving and Well-Being at the Base of the Pyramid: Implications for Transformative Financial Services Delivery,” Journal of Service Research, 18 (3), 405–21.
19.
McColl-KennedyJanet R.VargoStephen L.DaggerTracey S.SweeneyJillian C.van KasterenYasmin (2012), “Health Care Customer Value Cocreation Practice Styles,” Journal of Service Research, 15 (4), 370–89.
20.
McCrackenG. (1988), The Long Interview. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
21.
MendeMartinBradfordTonya WilliamsRoggeveenAnne L.ScottMaura L.ZavalaMariella (2024), “Consumer Vulnerability Dynamics and Marketing: Conceptual Foundations and Future Research Opportunities,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 52 (5), 1301–22.
22.
MendeMartinVan DoornJenny (2015), “Coproduction of Transformative Services as a Pathway to Improved Consumer Well-Being: Findings from a Longitudinal Study on Financial Counseling,” Journal of Service Research, 18 (3), 351–68.
23.
MorduchJonathanSchneiderRachel (2017), The Financial Diaries: How American Families Cope in a World of Uncertainty. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
P.E.A.R.L. (2025), Positive Energy Affecting Recovering Lives, (accessed October 20, 2025), (available at: https://arpearl.org/)
27.
PlaczekHilaryCruzStephanieChapdelaineMichelleCarlMaryLevinSaraHsuClarissa (2021), “Intersecting systemic and personal barriers to accessing social services: Qualitative interviews in northern California,” BMC Public Health, 21 (1), 1933.
28.
PolonskyMichael J.WeberVirginiaOzanneLucieRobertsonNichola (2026), “A Framework of Foreseen and Unforeseen Harms in Transformative Service Systems,” Journal of Service Research, 29(1), 3–21.
29.
RacitiMaria M.Russell-BennettRebekahLetherenKate (2022), “A Strengths-Based Approach to Eliciting Deep Insights From Social Marketing Customers Experiencing Vulnerability,” Journal of Marketing Management, 38 (11–12), 1137–77.
30.
RiedelAimeeMessengerDanaFleischmanDavidMulcahyRory (2022), “Consumers Experiencing Vulnerability: A State of Play in the Literature,” Journal of Services Marketing, 36 (2), 110–28.
31.
RothschildMichael L. (1999), “Carrots, Sticks, and Promises: A Conceptual Framework for the Management of Public Health and Social Issue Behaviors,” Journal of Marketing, 63 (4), 24–37.
32.
Russell-BennettRebekahKellyNickLetherenKateChellKathleen (2023), “The 5R Guidelines for a Strengths-Based Approach to Co-Design with Customers Experiencing Vulnerability,” International Journal of Market Research, 65 (2–3), 167–82.
33.
RutmanDeborahHubbersteyCarolPooleNancySchmidtRose A.Van BibberMarilyn (2020), “Multi-Service Prevention Programs for Pregnant and Parenting Women With Substance Use and Multiple Vulnerabilities: Program Structure and Clients’ Perspectives on Wraparound Programming,” BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 20 (1), 441.
34.
SaatciogluBigeCorusCanan (2014), “Poverty and Intersectionality: A Multidimensional Look into the Lives of the Impoverished,” Journal of Macromarketing, 34 (2), 122–32.
35.
SalisburyLinda CourtNenkovGergana Y.BlanchardSimon J.HillRonald PaulBrownAlexander L.MartinKelly D. (2023), “Beyond Income: Dynamic Consumer Financial Vulnerability,” Journal of Marketing, 87 (5), 657–78.
36.
SandbergBirgittaHurmerintaLeilaLeinoHenna M.MenzfeldMira (2022), “Autonomy or Security? Core Value Trade-Offs and Spillovers in Servicescapes for Vulnerable Customers,” Journal of Service Research, 25 (1), 9–28.
ShinnMarybethKhadduriJill (2020), “How Finland Ended Homelessness,” Cityscape, 22 (2), 75–80.
39.
SuddabyRoy (2006), “From the Editors: What Grounded Theory is Not,” Academy of Management Journal, 49 (4), 633–42.
40.
SweeneyJillian C.DanaherTracey S.McColl-KennedyJanet R. (2015), “Customer Effort in Value Cocreation Activities: Improving Quality of Life and Behavioral Intentions of Health Care Customers,” Journal of Service Research, 18 (3), 318–335.
41.
TaxStephen S.McCutcheonDavidWilkinsonIan F. (2013), “The Service Delivery Network (SDN): A Customer-Centric Perspective of the Customer Journey,” Journal of Service Research, 16 (4), 454–70.
VargoStephen LLuschRobert F. (2004), “Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing,” Journal of Marketing, 68 (1), 1–17.
44.
VargoStephen LLuschRobert F. (2016), “Institutions and Axioms: An Extension and Update of Service-Dominant Logic,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44, 5–23.
45.
VinkJosinaKoskela-HuotariKaisaTronvollBårdEdvardssonBoWetter-EdmanKatarina (2021), “Service Ecosystem Design: Propositions, Process Model, and Future Research Agenda,” Journal of Service Research, 24 (2), 168–86.
46.
YinRobert K. (2018), Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods, 6th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
