Employees with intellectual disabilities remain markedly underrepresented in frontline service roles, despite the social and economic benefits of inclusion. A key barrier is firms’ uncertainty about consumer reactions. To address this gap, we develop and validate the CAFID scale (Consumer Attitudes toward Frontline Employees with Intellectual Disabilities), designed specifically for the service sector—unlike existing, general disability attitude measures. Across multiple studies, we demonstrate the scale’s reliability, dimensionality, and validity. Results show that more favorable consumer attitudes not only support inclusive hiring but also buffer negative responses to service failures, improving repatronage and word-of-mouth intentions. With this practical tool, firms can assess customers’ readiness and support for inclusive hiring practices; policy makers can develop data-driven incentives to promote workplace equity; and researchers can explore dynamic consumer–employee interactions involving people with intellectual disabilities. Ultimately, the CAFID scale contributes to building more equitable, socially responsible service environments.
AliMuhammadGrabarskiMirit K.BakerMarzena (2024), “An Exploratory Study of Benefits and Challenges of Neurodivergent Employees: Roles of Knowing Neurodivergents and Neurodiversity Practices,” Equality, Diversity and Inclusion, 43 (2), 243-67.
AndersonEugene W. (1998), “Customer Satisfaction and Word of Mouth,” Journal of Service Research, 1 (1), 5-17.
5.
AndersonLaurelOstromAmy L.CorusCananFiskRaymond P.GallanAndrew S.GiraldoMarioMendeMartinMulderMarkRayburnSteven W.RosenbaumMark S.ShirahadaKunioWilliamsJerome D. (2013), “Transformative Service Research: An Agenda for the Future,” Journal of Business Research, 66 (8), 1203-10.
6.
AntonakRichard F. (1982), “Development and Psychometric Analysis of the Scale of Attitudes Toward Disabled Persons,” Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 13 (2), 22-9.
7.
AntonakRichard F.HarthRobert (1994), “Psychometric Analysis and Revision of the Mental Retardation Attitude Inventory,” Mental Retardation, 32 (4), 272.
8.
AntonakRichard F.LivnehHanoch (2000), “Measurement of Attitudes Toward Persons with Disabilities,” Disability and Rehabilitation, 22 (5), 211–24.
9.
BlockerC. P.DavisBrennanAndersonLaurel (2022), “Unintended Consequences in Transformative Service Research: Helping Without Harming,” Journal of Service Research, 25 (1), 3–8.
10.
BoyatzisRichard E. (1998), Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development (illustrated). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
11.
ButterworthJohnChristensenJulieFlippoKaren (2017), “Partnerships in Employment: Building Strong Coalitions to Facilitate Systems Change for Youth and Young Adults,” Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 47, 265-76.
12.
CheungGordon W.RensvoldRoger B. (2002), “Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance,” Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9 (2), 233-55.
13.
CorbinJuliet M.StraussAnselm (1990), “Grounded Theory Research: Procedures, Canons, and Evaluative Criteria,” Qualitative Sociology, 13 (1), 3-21.
14.
CreswellJohn W.PothCheryl N. (2018), Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
15.
DeVellisRobert F. (2017), Scale Development: Theory and Applications, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
16.
DillmanDon A.SmythJolene D.ChristianLeah Melani (2014), Internet, Phone, Mail, and Mixed Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method, 4th ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
DonthuNaveenGremlerDwayne D.KumarSatishPattnaikDebidutta (2022), “Mapping of Journal of Service Research Themes: A 22-Year Review,” Journal of Service Research, 25 (2), 187-93.
19.
DouglasSusan P.CraigC. Samuel (2007), “Collaborative and Iterative Translation: An Alternative Approach to Translation,” Journal of International Marketing, 15 (1), 30–43.
20.
DwertmannDavid. J.GoštautaitėBernadetaKazlauskaitėRūtaBučiūnienėIlona (2023), “Receiving Service from a Person with a Disability: Stereotypes, Perceptions of Corporate Social Responsibility, and the Opportunity for Increased Corporate Reputation.” Academy of Management Journal, 66 (1), 133-63.
21.
EfronH. Z.EfronR. (1967), “The Measurement of Attitudes Toward Mental Retardation,” American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 72, 100-7.
22.
EllenkampJoke J. H.BrouwersEvelien P. M.EmbregtsPetri J. C. M.JoosenMargot C. W.WeeghelJaap (2016), “Work Environment-Related Factors in Obtaining and Maintaining Work in a Competitive Employment Setting for Employees with Intellectual Disabilities: A Systematic Review,” Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 26 (1), 56-69.
23.
EssaMusa (2023), “Diversity from the Customer’s Perspective: Good or Bad? The Case of Disability,” Italian Journal of Marketing, 2023 (1), 81-98.
24.
FieldJoy M.FotheringhamDarimaSubramonyMaheshGustafronAndersOstromAmy L.LemonKatherine N.HuangMing-HuiMcColl-KennedyJanet R. (2021), “Service Research Priorities: Designing Sustainable Service Ecosystems,” Journal of Service Research, 24 (2), 462-79.
25.
FindlerLioraVilchinskyNoaWernerShili (2007), “The Multidimensional Attitudes Scale Toward Persons with Disabilities (MAS): Construction and Validation,” Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 50, 166–76.
26.
FiskRaymond P.DeanAlison M.AlkireLindaJoubertAlisonPreviteJosephineRobertsonNocholaRosenbaumMark Scott (2018). “Design for Service Inclusion: Creating Inclusive Service Systems 2050.” Journal of Service Management, 29 (5), 834-58.
27.
FornellClaesLarckerDavid F. (1981), “Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error,” Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (1), 39-50.
28.
GethingLindseyWheelerBarbara (1992), “The Interaction with Disabled Persons Scale: A New Australian Instrument to Measure Attitudes Toward People with Disabilities,” Australian Journal of Psychology, 44 (2), 75-82.
29.
GioiaDennis. A.CorleyKeving G.HamiltonAimee L. (2013), “Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research: Notes on the Gioia Methodology,” Organizational Research Methods, 16, 15–31.
30.
GrafNoreen M.BlankenshipCharlene J.SanchezGabrielCarlsonRalph (2007), “Living on the Line: Mexican and Mexican American Attitudes toward Disability,” Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 50 (3), 153-65.
31.
GrandSheldon A.BernierJoseph E.StrohmerDouglas C. (1982), “Attitudes Toward Disabled Persons as a Function of Social Context and Specific Disability,” Rehabilitation Psychology, 27 (3), 165-74.
32.
GrewalLaurenVan Der SluisHelen (2024), “Hidden Barriers to Marketplace Disability Accessibility: An Empirical Analysis of the Role of Perceived Trade-Offs,” Journal of Consumer Research, 51 (1), 66-78.
33.
HairJoseph F.BabinBarry J.AndersonRolph E.BlackWilliam C. (2019), Multivariate Data Analysis, 8th ed. Andover, UK: Cengage Learning.
34.
HeinPatriciaAnsariShaz (2022), “From Sheltered to Included: The Emancipation of Disabled Workers from Benevolent Marginalization,” Academy of Management Journal, 65 (3), 749-83.
35.
HenryDavidKeysChristopherJoppDavidBalcazarFabricio (1996), “The Community Living Attitudes Scale, Mental Retardation Form: Development and Psychometric Properties,” Mental Retardation, 34 (3), 149.
36.
HenselerJörgRingleChristian M.SarstedtMarko (2015), “A New Criterion for Assessing Discriminant Validity in Variance- Based Structural Equation Modeling,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43 (1), 115-35.
37.
HergenratherKennethRhodesScott (2007), “Exploring Undergraduate Student Attitudes Toward Persons with Disabilities: Application of the Disability Social Relationship Scale,” Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 50 (2), 66-75.
38.
HolwerdaAnjavan der KlinkJacde BoerMichiel R.GroothoffJohan W.BrouwerSandra (2013), “Predictors of Work Participation of Young Adults with Mild Intellectual Disabilities,” Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34 (6), 1982-90.
39.
HuiMichael K.ZhaoXiandeFanXiuchengAuKevin (2004), “When Does the Service Process Matter? A Test of Two Competing Theories,” Journal of Consumer Research, 31 (2), 465-75.
JonesEdward E.FarinaAmerigoHastorfAlbert H.MarkusHazelMillerDale T.ScottRobert A. (1984), Social Stigma: The Psychology of Marked Relationships. New York: W.H. Freeman.
42.
KalargyrouValentiniBarberNelson A.KuoPei-Jou (2018), “The Impact of Disability on Guests’ Perceptions of Service Quality Delivery in the Hospitality Industry,” International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 30 (12), 3632–55.
43.
KalargyrouValentiniTrivellasPanagiotisSigalaMarianna (2020), “Guests’ Stereotyping and Quality Evaluations of Service Delivered by Employees with Disabilities: Does Service Failure Matter?” Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 25 (7), 748-65.
44.
KuoPei-JouKalargyrouValentini (2014), “Consumers’ Perspectives on Service Staff with Disabilities in the Hospitality Industry,” International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 26 (2), 164–182.
45.
LenzLisaMittlaenderSergio (2022), “The Effect of Intergroup Contact on Discrimination,” Journal of Economic Psychology, 89, 102483.
46.
LivnehHanoch (1985), “Factor Structure of Attitudes Toward Individuals with Disabilities: A Replication,” Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 29 (1), 53–58.
47.
MaderaJuan M.TaylorD. ChristopherBarberNelson A. (2020), “Customer Service Evaluations of Employees with Disabilities: The Roles of Perceived Competence and Service Failure,” Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 61 (1), 5-18.
48.
MahatMarian (2008), “The Development of a Psychometrically-Sound Instrument to Measure Teachers’ Multidimensional Attitudes toward Inclusive Education,” International Journal of Special Education, 23 (1), 82-92.
49.
MathmannFrank (2021), “When for Whom and Why Do Frontline Employees with a Disability Affect Perceptions of Retail Brands,” in Queensland University of Technology, School of Advertising, Marketing and Public Relations, Brisbane, Australia.
50.
McDonaldMichael P. (2005), “Validity, Data Sources,” in Encyclopedia of Social Measurement, KempfLeonard K., ed. New York: Elsevier, 939–48.
51.
McFarlandLandonTranJoanne M. (2024), “Antecedents and Consequences of the Disability Stigma for Frontline Employees: A Qualitative Study,” Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, 34 (1), 71-89.
52.
MorinDianeRivardM.CrockerAnne G.BoursierC. P.CaronJean (2013), “Validation of the Attitudes Toward Intellectual Disability–ATTID Questionnaire,” Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 57 (3), 268-78.
53.
MorinDianeValoisPhillipeCrockerAnne G.CaronJean (2019). “Development and Psychometric Properties of The Attitudes Toward Intellectual Disability Questionnaire–Short Form,” Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 63 (6), 539-47.
NevalaNinaPehkonenIrmeliTeittinenAnttiVesalaHannuPörtforsPiaAnttilaHeidi (2019), “The Effectiveness of Rehabilitation Interventions on the Employment and Functioning of People with Intellectual Disabilities: A Systematic Review,” Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 29, 773-802.
56.
NunnallyJum C.BernsteinIra H. (1994), Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
57.
PetersonRobert A. (2000), Constructing Effective Questionnaires. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
58.
PettigrewThomas F. (1998), “Intergroup Contact Theory,” Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65-85.
59.
PettigrewThomas F.TroppLinda R. (2006), “A Meta-Analytic Test of Intergroup Contact Theory,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751-83.
60.
PodsakoffPhillip M.MacKenzieScott B.LeeJeong-YeonPodsakoffNathan P. (2003), “Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 88 (5), 879–903.
61.
PodsakoffPhillip M.MacKenzieScott B.PodsakoffNathan P. (2012), “Sources of Method Bias in Social Science Research and Recommendations on How to Control It,” Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539-69.
62.
PruettSteven R.LeeEun-JeongChanFongWangMing HungLaneFrank J. (2008), “Dimensionality of the Contact with Disabled Persons Scale: Results from Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analyses,” Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 51 (4), 210-20.
63.
ReynoldsWilliam M. (1982), “Development of Reliable and Valid Short Forms of the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale,” Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38 (1), 119-25.
64.
RosenbaumMark ScottBaniyaRohanSeger-GuttmannTali (2017), “Customer Responses Toward Disabled Frontline Employees,” International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 45 (4), 385–403.
65.
RosenbaumMark ScottCorusCananOstromAmy L.AndersonLaurelFiskRaymondGallanAndrewGiraldoMarioMendeMartinMulderMarkRayburnStevenShirahadaKunioWilliamsJerome (2011), “Conceptualization and Aspirations of Transformative Service Research,” Journal of Research for Consumers, 19, 1-6.
66.
SciorKatarina (2011), “Public Awareness, Attitudes and Beliefs Regarding Intellectual Disability,” Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32, 2164–82.
67.
SpillerStephen A.FitzsimonsGavan J.LynchJohn G.McClellandGary H. (2013), “Spotlights, Floodlights, and the Magic Number Zero: Simple Effects Tests in Moderated Regression,” Journal of Marketing Research, 50 (2), 277-88.
68.
SteenkampJan-BenedictBaumgartnerHans (1998), “Assessing Measurement Invariance in Cross-Cultural Research,” Journal of Consumer Research, 25 (1), 78-90.
69.
StoneDiana L.ColellaAdrienne (1996), “A Model of Factors Affecting the Treatment of Disabled Individuals in Organizations,” Academy of Management Review, 21 (2), 352-401.
70.
TajfelHenriTurnerJohn C. (1979), “An Integrative Theory of Inter-Group Conflict”, in The Social Psychology of Inter-Group Relations, AustinW. G.WorchelS., eds. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole, 33-47.
71.
TaubnerHelenaTidemanMagnusStaland NymanCarin (2022), “Employment Sustainability for People with Intellectual Disability: A Systematic Review,” Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 32 (3), 353-64.
72.
ThomasAdrian (2000). “Stability of Tringo’s Hierarchy of Preference Toward Disability Groups: 30 Years Later,” Psychological Reports, 86 (3/2), 1155-6.
73.
ToubianaMadelineRuebottomTrish (2022). “Stigma Hierarchies: The Internal Dynamics of Stigmatization in the Sex Work Occupation,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 67 (2), 515-52.
74.
TourangeauRogerRipsLance J.RasinskiKenneth (2000). The Psychology of Survey Response. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
75.
TringoJohn L. (1970). “The Hierarchy of Preference Toward Disability Groups,” The Journal of Special Education, 4 (3), 295-306.
76.
TroppLinda R.WhiteFionaRucinskiChristina L.TredouxColin (2022), “Intergroup Contact and Prejudice Reduction: Prospects and Challenges in Changing Youth Attitudes,” Review of General Psychology, 26 (3), 342-60.
VoermansMoniek A. C.WilthagenTonEmbregtsPetri J. C. M. (2023), “Informal Network Members’ Perspectives and Experiences on Work for People with Intellectual Disabilities: A Thematic Synthesis,” Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 34, 37-55.
79.
WehmanPaulTaylorJoshuaBrookeValeria, et al (2018), “Toward Competitive Employment for Persons with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: What Progress Have We Made and Where Do We Need to Go,” Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 43 (3), 131-44.
80.
WetzelsMartinGrewalDhruvWetzelsRuud (2023), A Systematic and Visual Overview of 25 Years of the Journal of Service Research: The Journey Continues. Journal of Service Research, 26, 479-92.
81.
YukerHarold. E.BlockJ. R.YoungJanet H. (1966), The Measurement of Attitudes Toward Disabled Persons. Albertson, NY: Human Resources Foundation.
82.
ZaefarianGhasemKadileVitaHennebergStephan C.LeischnigAlexander (2017), “Endogeneity Bias in Marketing Research: Problem, Causes and Remedies,” Industrial Marketing Management, 65, 39-46.
83.
ZeithamlValerie A.BitnerMaryGremlerDwayne D. (2016), Services Marketing: Integrating Customer Focus Across the Firm. New York: McGraw Hill/Irwin.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
