Robots are the next wave in service technology; however, this advanced technology is not perfect. This research examines how social perceptions regarding the warmth and competence of service robots influence consumer reactions to service failures and recovery efforts by robots. We argue that humanoid (vs. nonhumanoid) service robots are more strongly associated with warmth (whereas competence does not differ). This tendency to expect greater warmth from humanoid robots has important consequences for service firms: (i) consumers are more dissatisfied due to lack of warmth following a process failure caused by a humanoid (vs. nonhumanoid; Study 1); (ii) humanoids (but not nonhumanoids) can recover a service failure by themselves via sincere apology, restoring perceptions of warmth (Study 2A); (iii) humanoids (but not nonhumanoids) can also effectively provide explanations as a recovery tactic (Study 2B); and, importantly, (iv) human intervention can be used to mitigate dissatisfaction following inadequate recovery by a nonhumanoid robot (Study 3), supporting the notion of human-robot collaboration. Taken together, this research offers theoretical implications for robot anthropomorphism and practical implications for firms employing service robots.
AakerJenniferVohsKathleen D.MogilnerCassie (2010), “Nonprofits Are Seen as Warm and For-Profits as Competent: Firm Stereotypes Matter,” Journal of Consumer Research, 37 (2), 224–37.
2.
AggarwalPankajMcGillAnn L. (2007), “Is That Car Smiling at Me? Schema Congruity as a Basis for Evaluating Anthropomorphized Products,” Journal of Consumer Research, 34 (4), 468–79.
3.
AlhoutiSarahWrightScott A.BakerThomas L. (2019), “Responding to Service Failures with Prevention Framed Donations,” Journal of Services Marketing, 33 (5), 547–556.
4.
BigmanYochanan E.GrayKurt (2018), “People Are Averse to Machines Making Moral Decisions,” Cognition, 181, 21–34.
5.
BitnerMary J.OstromAmy L.MorganFelicia N. (2008), “Service Blueprinting: A Practical Technique for Service Innovation,” California Management Review, 50 (3), 66–94.
6.
BitnerMary J.BoomsBernard H.TetreaultMary S. (1990), “The Service Encounter: Diagnosing Favorable and Unfavorable Incidents,” Journal of Marketing, 54 (1), 71–84.
7.
BlodgettJeffrey G.HillDonna J.TaxStephen S. (1997), “The Effects of Distributive, Procedural, and Interactional Justice on Postcomplaint Behavior,” Journal of Retailing, 73 (2), 185–210.
8.
BoltonLisa E.MattilaAnna S. (2015), “How Does Corporate Social Responsibility Affect Consumer Response to Service Failure in Buyer–Seller Relationships?,” Journal of Retailing, 91 (1), 140–53.
9.
BradleyGrahamSparksBeverley (2012), “Explanations: If, When, and How they Aid Service Recovery,” Journal of Services Marketing, 26 (1), 41–50.
10.
BreazealCynthia (2003), “Emotion and Sociable Humanoid Robots,” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59 (1-2), 119–55.
11.
BroadbentElizabeth (2017), “Interactions with Robots: The Truths we Reveal about Ourselves,” Annual Review of Psychology, 68, 627–52.
12.
BroadbentElizabethKumarVinayakLiXingyanJohnSollers3rdStaffordRebecca Q.MacDonaldBruce A.WegnerDaniel M. (2013), “Robots with Display Screens: A Robot with a More Humanlike Face Display Is Perceived to Have MORE Mind and a Better Personality,” PLoS One, 8 (8), e72589.
13.
BrownStephen W. (1997), “Service Recovery through IT: Complaint Handling Will Differentiate Firms in the Future,” Marketing Management, 6 (3), 25–27.
14.
BrownTodd A.SautterJohn A.LittvayLeventeSautterAlberta C.BearnesBrennen (2010), “Ethics and Personality: Empathy and Narcissism as Moderators of Ethical Decision Making in Business Students,” Journal of Education for Business, 85 (4), 203–8.
15.
ChanHaksinWanLisa C.SinLeo Y. M. (2007), “Hospitality Service Failures: Who Will be more Dissatisfied?” International Journal of Hospitality Management26 (3), 531–45.
16.
ChenRocky PengWanEcho WenLevyEric (2017), “The Effect of Social Exclusion on Consumer Preference for Anthropomorphized Brands,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27 (1), 23–34.
CollierJoel E.BreazealeMichaelWhiteAllyn (2017), “Giving Back the “Self” in Self-service: Customer Preferences in Self-service Failure Recovery,” Journal of Services Marketing, 31 (6), 604–17.
19.
ColquittJason A.ZipayKate P.LynchJohn W.OutlawRyan (2018), “Bringing ‘The Beholder’ Center Stage: On the Propensity to Perceive Overall Fairness,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 148, 159–77.
20.
ColquittJason A (2001), “On the Dimensionality of Organizational Justice: A Construct Validation of a Measure,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 86 (3), 386–400.
21.
CuddyAmy J.FiskeSusan T.GlickPeter (2008), “Warmth and Competence as Universal Dimensions of Social Perception: The Stereotype Content Model and the BIAS Map,” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 61–149.
22.
DavisMark H. (1983), “Measuring Individual Differences in Empathy: Evidence for a Multidimensional Approach,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44 (1), 113–26.
23.
de KervenoaelRonanHasanRajibulSchwobAlexandreGohEdwin (2020), “Leveraging Human-Robot Interaction in Hospitality Services: Incorporating the Role of Perceived Value, Empathy, and Information Sharing into Visitors’ Intentions to Use Social Robots,” Tourism Management78, 104042.
24.
DeKeyserArneSchepersJeroenKonuşUmut (2015), “Multichannel Customer Segmentation: Does the After-sales Channel Matter? A Replication and Extension,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 32 (4), 453–56.
25.
DelcourtCécileGremlerDwayne D.ZanetFabrice Devan RielAllard CR (2017), “An Analysis of the Interaction Effect between Employee Technical and Emotional Competencies in Emotionally Charged Service Encounters,” Journal of Service Management, 28 (1), 85–106.
26.
DeWittTomBradyMichael K. (2003), “Rethinking Service Recovery Strategies: The Effect of Rapport on Consumer Responses to Service Failure,” Journal of Service Research, 6 (2), 193–207.
27.
DuffyBrian R. (2003), “Anthropomorphism and the Social Robot,” Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42 (3-4), 177–90.
28.
EpleyNicholasWaytzAdamCacioppoJohn T. (2007), “On Seeing Human: A Three-factor Theory of Anthropomorphism,” Psychological Review, 114 (4), 864–86.
29.
EysselFriederikeHegelFrank (2012), “(S)he’s Got the Look: Gender Stereotyping of Robots,” Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42 (9), 2213–30.
30.
EysselFriederikeKuchenbrandtDieta (2012), “Social Categorization of Social Robots: Anthropomorphism as a Function of Robot Group Membership,” British Journal of Social Psychology, 51 (4), 724–31.
31.
FehrRyanGelfandMichele J.NagMonisha (2010), “The Road to Forgiveness: A Meta-Analytic Synthesis of Its Situational and Dispositional Correlates,” Psychological Bulletin, 136 (5), 894–914.
32.
FiskeSusan T.CuddyAmy J.GlickPeter (2007), “Universal Dimensions of Social Cognition: Warmth and Competence,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11 (2), 77–83.
33.
FoaEdna B.FoaUriel G. (2012), “Resource Theory of Social Exchange,” in Handbook of Social Resource Theory, KjellTörnblomKazemiAli, eds. New York: Springer, 15–32.
34.
FolgerRobert G.CropanzanoRussell (1998), Organizational Justice and Human Resource Management. Sage Publication.
35.
ForbesLukas P. (2008), “When Something Goes Wrong and No One Is around: Non-internet Self-service Technology Failure and Recovery,” Journal of Services Marketing, 22 (4), 316–27.
36.
FornellClaesLarckerDavid F. (1981), “Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error,” Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (1), 39–50.
GrayHeather M.GrayKurtWegnerDaniel M. (2007), “Dimensions of Mind Perception,” Science, 315 (5812), 619–19.
39.
GrayKurtWegnerDaniel M. (2012), “Feeling Robots and Human Zombies: Mind Perception and the Uncanny Valley,” Cognition, 125 (1), 125–30.
40.
GrayKurtWegnerDaniel M. (2010), “Blaming God for Our Pain: Human Suffering and the Divine Mind,” Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14 (1), 7–16.
41.
GrönroosChristian (1988), “Service Quality: The Six Criteria of Good Perceived Service,” Review of Business, 9 (3), 10–3.
HayesAndrew (2018), Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-based Approach. New York: Guilford Press.
44.
HeerinkMarcelKröseBenEversVanessaWielingaBob (2008), “The Influence of Social Presence on Acceptance of a Companion Robot by Older People,” Journal of Physical Agents, 2 (2), 33–40.
45.
HoffmanK. DouglasKelleyScott W.RotalskyHolly M. (1995), “Tracking Service Failures and Employee Recovery Efforts,” Journal of Services Marketing, 9 (2), 49–61.
46.
HonigShaneeOron-GiladTal (2018), “Understanding and Resolving Failures in Human-robot Interaction: Literature Review and Model Development,” Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 861. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00861.
47.
HuangMing-HuiRustRoland T. (2020), “Engaged to a Robot? The Role of AI in Service,” Journal of Service Research, doi: 10.1177/1094670520902266.
48.
HuangMing-HuiRustRoland T. (2018), “Artificial Intelligence in Service,” Journal of Service Research, 21 (2), 155–72.
49.
HurJulia D.KooMinjungHofmannWilhelm (2015), “When Temptations Come Alive: How Anthropomorphism Undermines Self-control,” Journal of Consumer Research, 42 (2), 340–58.
50.
JörlingMoritzBöhmRobertPaluchStefanie (2019), “Service Robots: Drivers of Perceived Responsibility for Service Outcomes,” Journal of Service Research, 22 (4), 404–420.
51.
JuddCharles M.James-HawkinsLaurieYzerbytVincentKashimaYoshihisa (2005), “Fundamental Dimensions of Social Judgment: Understanding the Relations between Judgments of Competence and Warmth,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89 (6), 899–913.
52.
KeatingByron W.McColl-KennedyJanet R.SolnetDavid (2018), “Theorizing beyond the Horizon: Service Research in 2050,” Journal of Service Management, 29 (5), 766–75.
53.
KimSeo YoungSchmittBernd H.ThalmannNadia M. (2019), “Eliza in the Uncanny Valley: Anthropomorphizing Consumer Robots Increases Their Perceived Warmth but Decreases Liking,” Marketing Letters, 30 (1), 1–12.
54.
KuchenbrandtDietaHäringMarkusEichbergJessicaEysselFriederikeAndréElisabeth (2014), “Keep an Eye on the Task! How Gender Typicality of Tasks Influence Human–Robot Interactions,” International Journal of Social Robotics, 6 (3), 417–27.
55.
LarivièreBartBowenDavidAndreassenTor W.KunzWernerSirianniNancy J.VossChrisWünderlichNancy V.KeyserArne De (2017), “Service Encounter 2.0”: An Investigation into the Roles of Technology, Employees and Customers,” Journal of Business Research, 79, 238–46.
56.
LiXueniChanKimmy WaKimSara (2018), “Service with Emoticons: How Customers Interpret Employee Use of Emoticons in Online Service Encounters,” Journal of Consumer Research, 45 (5), 973–87.
57.
LiaoHui. (2007), “Do It Right This Time: The Role of Employee Service Recovery Performance in Customer-perceived Justice and Customer Loyalty after Service Failures,” Journal of Applied psychology, 92 (2), 475–89.
58.
LongoniChiaraBonezziAndreaMorewedgeCarey K. (2019), “Resistance to Medical Artificial Intelligence,” Journal of Consumer Research, 46 (4), 629–50.
59.
LuLuCaiRuiyingGursoyDogan (2019), “Developing and Validating a Service Robot Integration Willingness Scale,” International Journal of Hospitality Management, 80, 36–51.
60.
MaengAhreumAggarwalPankaj (2017), “Facing Dominance: Anthropomorphism and the Effect of Product Face Ratio on Consumer Preference,” Journal of Consumer Research, 44 (5), 1104–22.
61.
MarinovaDetelinade RuyterKoHuangMing-HuiMeuterMatthew L.ChallagallaGoutam (2017), “Getting Smart: Learning from Technology-empowered Frontline Interactions,” Journal of Service Research, 20 (1), 29–42.
62.
MattilaAnna S.ChoWonaeRoHeejung (2011), “The Role of Self-service Technologies in Restoring Justice,” Journal of Business Research, 64 (4), 348–55.
63.
MattilaAnna S (2006), “The Power of Explanations in Mitigating the Ill-effects of Service Failures,” Journal of Services Marketing, 20 (7), 422–28.
64.
MaxhamJames G.IIINetemeyerRichard G. (2003), “Firms Reap What They Sow: The Effects of Shared Values and Perceived Organizational Justice on Customers’ Evaluations of Complaint Handling,” Journal of Marketing, 67 (1), 46–62.
65.
MayFrankMongaAshwani (2013), “When Time Has a Will of Its Own, the Powerless Don’t Have the Will to Wait: Anthropomorphism of Time Can Decrease Patience,” Journal of Consumer Research, 40 (5), 924–42.
66.
McColl-KennedyJanet R.DausCatherine S.SparksBeverley A. (2003), “The Role of Gender in Reactions to Service Failure and Recovery,” Journal of Service Research, 6 (1), 66–82.
67.
McShaneBlakeley B.BöckenholtUlf (2017), “Single-paper Meta-analysis: Benefits for Study Summary, Theory Testing, and Replicability,” Journal of Consumer Research, 43 (6), 1048–63.
68.
MendeMartinScottMaura L.DoornJenny vanGrewalDhruvShanksIlana (2019), “Service Robots Rising: How Humanoid Robots Influence Service Experiences and Elicit Compensatory Consumer Responses,” Journal of Marketing Research, 56 (4), 535–56.
69.
MendeMartinScottMaura L.BoltonLisa E. (2018), “All That Glitters Is Not Gold: The Penalty Effect of Conspicuous Consumption in Services and How It Changes with Customers and Contexts,” Journal of Service Research, 21 (4), 405–20.
70.
MeuterMatthew L.BitnerMary JoOstromAmy L.BrownStephen W. (2005), “Choosing among Alternative Service Delivery Modes: An Investigation of Customer Trial of Self-service Technologies,” Journal of Marketing, 69 (2), 61–83.
71.
MirnigNicoleStollnbergerGeraldMikschMarkusStadlerSusanneGiulianiManuelTscheligiManfred (2017), “To err Is Robot: How Humans Assess and Act Toward an Erroneous Social Robot,” Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 4 (21), 1–15.
72.
MoriMasahiroMacDormanKarl F.KagekiNorri (2012), “The Uncanny Valley [from the field],” IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 19 (2), 98–100.
73.
MoriMasahiro (1970), “The Uncanny Valley,” Energy, 7 (4), 33–35.
PaauweRobert A.HoornJohan F.KonijnElly A.KeysonDavid V. (2015), “Designing Robot Embodiments for Social Interaction: Affordances Topple Realism and Aesthetics,” International Journal of Social Robotics, 7 (5), 697–708.
76.
ParasuramanAnanthanarayananColbyCharles L. (2015), “An Updated and Streamlined Technology Readiness Index: TRI 2.0,” Journal of Service Research, 18 (1), 59–74.
77.
ParasuramanAnanthanarayanan (2000), “Technology Readiness Index (TRI) a Multiple-item Scale to Measure Readiness to Embrace New Technologies,” Journal of Service Research, 2 (4), 307–20.
78.
ParasuramanAnanthanarayananZeithamlValarie A.BerryLeonard L. (1985), “A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for Future Research,” Journal of Marketing, 49 (4), 41–50.
79.
PatientDavid L.SkarlickiDaniel P. (2010), “Increasing Interpersonal and Informational Justice When Communicating Negative News: The Role of the Manager’s Empathic Concern and Moral Development,” Journal of Management36 (2), 555–78.
80.
PriceLinda L.ArnouldEric J. (1999), “Commercial Friendships: Service Provider-client Relationships in Context,” Journal of Marketing, 63 (4), 38–56.
81.
PuzakovaMarinaKwakHyokjin (2017), “Should Anthropomorphized Brands Engage Customers? The Impact of Social Crowding on Brand Preferences,” Journal of Marketing, 81 (6), 99–115.
82.
PuzakovaMarinaKwakHyokjinRoceretoJoseph F. (2013), “When Humanizing Brands Goes Wrong: The Detrimental Effect of Brand Anthropomorphization amid Product Wrongdoings,” Journal of Marketing, 77 (3), 81–100.
83.
RafaeliAnatAltmanDanielGremlerDwayne D.HuangMing-HuiGrewalDhruvIyerBalaParasuramanAnanthanarayanande RuyterKo (2017), “The Future of Frontline Research: Invited Commentaries,” Journal of Service Research, 20 (1), 91–99.
84.
RoschkHolgerKaiserSusanne (2013), “The Nature of an Apology: An Experimental Study on How to Apologize after a Service Failure,” Marketing Letters, 24 (3), 293–309.
85.
SchmittManfredGollwitzerMarioFörsterNikolaiMontadaLeo (2004), “Effects of Objective and Subjective Account Components on Forgiving,” Journal of Social Psychology, 144 (5), 465–86.
86.
SchroederJuliannaEpleyNicholas (2016), “Mistaking Minds and Machines: How Speech Affects Dehumanization and Anthropomorphism,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145 (11), 1427–37.
87.
ScottMaura L.MendeMartinBoltonLisa E. (2013), “Judging the Book by Its Cover? How Consumers Decode Conspicuous Consumption Cues in Buyer–Seller Relationships,” Journal of Marketing Research, 50 (3), 334–47.
88.
ShapiroDebra L.ButtnerE. HollyBarryBruce (1994), “Explanations: What Factors Enhance Their Perceived Adequacy?,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 58, 346–46.
89.
ShapiroTerriNieman-GonderJennifer (2006), “Effect of Communication Mode in Justice-based Service Recovery,” Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 16 (2), 124–44.
90.
SingerJune (1994), Boundaries of the Soul: The Practice of Jung’s Psychology. New York: Anchor Books.
91.
SmithAmy K.BoltonRuth N.WagnerJanet (1999), “A Model of Customer Satisfaction with Service Encounters Involving Failure and Recovery,” Journal of Marketing Research, 36 (3), 356–72.
92.
SmithNicholas A.MartinezLarry R.SabatIsaac E. (2016), “Weight and Gender in Service Jobs: The Importance of Warmth in Predicting Customer Satisfaction,” Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 57 (3), 314–28.
93.
SurprenantCarol F.SolomonMichael R. (1987), “Predictability and Personalization in the Service Encounter,” Journal of Marketing, 51 (2), 86–96.
94.
TauschNicoleKenworthyJared B.HewstoneMiles (2007), “The Confirmability and Disconfirmability of Trait Concepts Revisited: Does Content Matter?” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92 (3), 542–56.
TungVincentWingSunAuNorman (2018), “Exploring Customer Experiences with Robotics in Hospitality,” International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 30 (7), 2680–97.
97.
van DoornJennyMendeMartinNobleStephanie M.HullandJohnOstromAmy L.GrewalDhruvPetersenJ. Andrew (2017), “Domo Arigato Mr. Roboto: Emergence of Automated Social Presence in Organizational Frontlines and Customers’ Service Experiences,” Journal of Service Research, 20 (1), 43–58.
98.
Van VaerenberghYvesVargaDorottyaDe KeyserArneOrsingherChiara (2019), “The Service Recovery Journey: Conceptualization, Integration, and Directions for Future Research,” Journal of Service Research, 22 (2), 103–19.
99.
Van VaerenberghYvesOrsingherChiaraVermeirIrisLarivièreBart (2014), “A Meta-analysis of Relationships Linking Service Failure Attributions to Customer Outcomes,” Journal of Service Research, 17 (4), 381–98.
100.
VictorinoLianaVermaRohitBonnerBryan L.WardellDon G. (2012), “Can Customers Detect Script Usage in Service Encounters? An Experimental Video Analysis,” Journal of Service Research, 15 (4), 390–400.
101.
WaytzAdamGrayKurtEpleyNicholasWegnerDaniel M. (2010), “Causes and Consequences of Mind Perception,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14 (8), 383–88.
102.
Wen WanEchoChenRocky PengJinLiyin (2017), “Judging a Book by Its Cover? The Effect of Anthropomorphism on Product Attribute Processing and Consumer Preference,” Journal of Consumer Research, 43 (6), 1008–30.
103.
WirtzJochenPattersonPaul G.KunzWerner H.GruberThorstenVinh NhatLuPaluchStefanieMartinsAntje (2018), “Brave New World: Service Robots in the Frontline,” Journal of Service Management, 29 (5), 907–31.
104.
WirtzJochenMattilaAnna S. (2004), “Consumer Responses to Compensation, Speed of Recovery and Apology after a Service Failure,” International Journal of Service Industry Management, 15 (2), 150–66.
105.
ZhouXinyueKimSaraWangLili (2019), “Money Helps When Money Feels: Money Anthropomorphism Increases Charitable Giving,” Journal of Consumer Research, 45 (5), 953–72
106.
ZhuZhenNakataCherylSivakumarKumaraswamyGrewalDhruv (2013), “Fix It or Leave It? Customer Recovery from Self-service Technology Failures,” Journal of Retailing, 89 (1), 15–29.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
