We propose a conceptual framework that includes the antecedents and consequences of firms’ adopting and integrating robotics into their customer service operations. Drawing insights from literature on customer service, technology marketing, and computer science, our proposed framework elaborates on the concept of the degree of robotics adoption (DRA) as well as the antecedents (employee acceptance of robots and customer acceptance of robots) and multiple sequential consequences (service quality, customer long-term performance, and customer engagement) of DRA. We also discuss how the nature of the firm (Business to Consumer versus Business-to-Business, i.e., B2C vs. B2B), service characteristics (utilitarian vs. hedonic), and brand positioning (low equity vs. high equity) might moderate the relationship between DRA and service quality. Further, we provide actionable guidance for managers to adopt and integrate robotics into their customer service operations.
AchrolRavi S.KotlerPhilip (2012), “Frontiers of the Marketing Paradigm in the Third Millennium,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40 (1), 35–52.
AdhikariRichard (2017), “Robots May Become Go-To Customer Service Reps,” CRM Buyer, August 26, (accessed September 20, 2019), [available athttps://www.crmbuyer.com/story/84765.html].
4.
AgarwalRituSambamurthyVallabhStairRalph M. (2000), “Research Report: The Evolving Relationship between General and Specific Computer Self-Efficacy—An Empirical Assessment,” Information Systems Research, 11 (4), 418–430.
5.
AggarwalPankajMcGillAnn L. (2007), “Is That Car Smiling at Me? Schema Congruity as a Basis for Evaluating Anthropomorphized Products,” Journal of Consumer Research, 34 (1), 468–479.
AndreassenTor W.van OestRutger D.Lervik-OlsenLine (2018), “Customer Inconvenience and Price Compensation: A Multiperiod Approach to Labor-Automation Trade-Offs in Services,” Journal of Service Research, 21 (2), 173–183.
8.
AronRaviDuttaShantanuJanakiramanRamkumarPathakPraveen A. (2011), “The Impact of Automation of Systems on Medical Errors: Evidence from Field Research,” Information System Research, 22 (3), 429–446.
9.
BaloghIstvanOhlssonKerstinaHanssonGert-AkeEngströmTomasSkerfvingStaffan (2006), “Increasing the Degree of Automation in a Production System: Consequences for the Physical Workload,” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 36 (4), 353–365.
Bar-CohenYosephBreazealCynthia L. (2003), Biologically-Inspired Intelligent Robots. Bellingham, WA: SPIE Press.
12.
BarnettWillyNasrLindaKeelingKathyWagnerAlan (2016), “Service Robotization: Building a Collaborative Research Agenda for Interactive Service Robots,” 2016 SMA Proceedings, 505.
13.
BauerAndreaWollherrDirkBussMartin (2008), “Human–Robot Collaboration: A Survey,” International Journal of Humanoid Robotics, 5(1), 47–66.
14.
BelkRussell W. (2013), “Extended Self in a Digital World,” Journal of Consumer Research, 40 (3), 477–500.
15.
BitnerMary Jo (2017), “Service Research: Rigor, Relevance, and Community,” Journal of Service Research, 20 (2), 103–104.
16.
BoeckHaroldRoyJeanDurifFabienGrégoireMarc (2011), “The Effect of Perceived Intrusion on Consumers’ Attitude Towards Using an RFID-Based Marketing Program,” Procedia Computer Science, 5 (2011), 841–848.
17.
BoltonRuth N.DrewJames H. (1991), “A Multistage Model of Customers’ Assessments of Service Quality and Value,” Journal of Consumer Research, 17 (4), 375–384.
BrownSteven P.LamSon K. (2008), “A Meta-Analysis of Relationships Linking Employee Satisfaction to Customer Responses,” Journal of Retailing, 84 (3), 243–255.
20.
BurghartCatherinaHaeusslingRoger (2005), “Evaluation Criteria for Human Robot Interaction,” Companions: Hard Problems and Open Challenges in Robot-Human Interaction, 23–31.
21.
BurgoonJudee K.BonitoJoseph A.BengtssonBjornCederbergCarlLundebergMagnusAllspachL. (2000), “Interactivity in Human-Computer Interaction: A Study of Credibility, Understanding, and Influence,” Computers in Human Behavior, 16 (6), 553–574.
22.
BurkhardtMarlene E.BrassDaniel J. (1990), “Changing Patterns or Patterns of Change: The Effects of a Change in Technology on Social Network Structure and Power,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 35 (1), 104–127.
CaicMartinaAvelinoJoaoMahrDominikOdekerken-SchroderGabyBernardinoAlexandre (Forthcoming), “Robotic versus Human Coaches for Active Aging: An Automated Social Presence Perspective,” International Journal of Social Robotics, doi:10.1007/s12369-018-0507-2.
CasteloNoahSchmittBerndSarvaryMiklos (2019), “Human or Robot? Consumer Responses to Radical Cognitive Enhancement Products,” Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 4 (3), 217–230.
ColbyCharles L.MithasSunilParasuramanA. (2016), “Service Robots: How Ready Are Consumers to Adopt and What Drives Acceptance?” The 2016 Frontiers in Service Conference, Bergen, Norway.
33.
CompeauDeborah R.HigginsChristopher A. (1995), “Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test,” MIS Quarterly, 19 (2), 189–211.
34.
DabholkarPratibha A.BagozziRichard P. (2002), “An Attitudinal Model of Technology-Based Self-Service: Moderating Effects of Consumer Traits and Situational Factors,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30 (3), 184–201.
DionDelphineBorrazStephane (2017), “Managing Status: How Luxury Brands Shape Class Subjectivities in the Service Encounter,” Journal of Marketing, 81 (5), 67–85.
40.
DoornJenny VanMendeMartinNobleStephanie M.HullandJohnOstromAmy L.GrewalDhruvAndrew PetersenJ. (2017), “Domo Arigato Mr. Roboto: Emergence of Automated Social Presence in Organizational Frontlines and Customers’ Service Experiences,” Journal of Service Research, 20 (1), 43–58.
EpleyNicholasAkalisScottWaytzAdamCacioppoJohn T. (2008), “Creating Social Connection through Inferential Reproduction: Loneliness and Perceived Agency in Gadgets, Gods, and Greyhounds,” Psychological Science, 19 (2), 114–120.
43.
EpleyNicholasWaytzAdamCacioppoJohn T. (2007), “On Seeing Human: A Three-Factor Theory of Anthropomorphism,” Psychological Review, 114 (4), 864–886.
GoetzJenniferKieslerSaraPowersAaron (2003), “Matching Robot Appearance and Behavior to Tasks to Improve Human-Robot Cooperation,” in Proceedings of the 12th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, ROMAN 2003, 55–60.
49.
GrantIan C. (2005), “Young Peoples’ Relationships with Online Marketing Practices: An Intrusion Too Far?” Journal of Marketing Management, 21 (5-6), 607–623.
50.
GuidoGianluigiPelusoAlessandro M. (2015), “Brand Anthropomorphism: Conceptualization, Measurement, and Impact on Brand Personality and Loyalty,” Journal of Brand Management, 22 (1), 1–19.
51.
HerrmannPhilipp N.KundischDennis O.RahmanMohammad S. (2015), “Beating Irrationality: Does Delegating to IT Alleviate the Sunk Cost Effect?” Management Science, 61 (4), 831–850.
52.
HirschmanElizabeth C.HolbrookMorris B. (1982), “Hedonic Consumption: Emerging Concepts, Methods and Propositions,” Journal of Marketing, 46 (3), 92–101.
53.
HoffmanDonna L.NovakThomas P. (2018), “Consumer and Object Experience in the Internet of Things: An Assemblage Theory Approach,” Journal of Consumer Research, 44 (6), 1178–1204.
54.
HolzwarthMartinJaniszewskiChrisNeumannMarcus M. (2006), “The Influence of Avatars on Online Consumer Shopping Behavior,” Journal of Marketing, 70 (4), 19–36.
55.
HuangMing-HuiRustRoland T. (2018), “Artificial Intelligence in Service,” Journal of Service Research, 21 (2), 155–172.
56.
HuangMing-HuiRustRoland T. (2017), “Technology-Driven Service Strategy,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45 (6), 906–924.
ISO 8373 (2012), “Robots and Robotic Devices—Vocabulary,” International Organization for Standardization (ISO), March, (accessed September 20, 2019), [available athttps://www.iso.org/standard/55890.html].
61.
JarvenpaaSirkka L.IvesBlake (1991), “Executive Involvement and Participation in the Management of Information Technology,” MIS Quarterly, 15 (2), 205–227.
62.
JaspersonJon SeanCarterPamela E.ZmudRobert W. (2005), “A Comprehensive Conceptualization of the Post-Adoptive Behaviors Associated with IT-Enabled Work Systems,” MIS Quarterly, 29 (3), 525–557.
63.
KahnBarbara E. (1998), “Dynamic Relationships with Customers: High-Variety Strategies,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 26 (1), 45–53.
64.
KieslerSaraGoetzJennifer (2002), “Mental Models and Cooperation with Robotic Assistants,” in Proceedings of Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Minneapolis, MN: ACM, 576–577.
65.
KimSaraChenRocky PengKeZhang (2016), “Anthropomorphized Helpers Undermine Autonomy and Enjoyment in Computer Games,” Journal of Consumer Research, 43 (2), 282–302.
66.
KimSaraMcGillAnn L. (2011), “Gaming with Mr. Slot or Gaming the Slot Machine? Power, Anthropomorphism, and Risk Perception,” Journal of Consumer Research, 38 (1), 94–107.
KodaTomokoMaesPattie (1996), “Agents with Faces: The Effect of Personification,” In Proceedings of IEEE Workshop on Robot and Human Communication, Vol. 5. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 189–194.
69.
KohlerClemens F.RohmAndrew J.Kode RuyterWetzelsMartin (2011), “Return on Interactivity: The Impact of Online Agents on Newcomer Adjustment,” Journal of Marketing, 75 (2), 93–108.
70.
KumarV.RajanBharathGuptaShaphaliPozzaIlaria Dalla (2019), “Customer Engagement in Service,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 47 (1), 138–160.
71.
KushwahaTarunShankarVenkatesh (2013), “Are Multichannel Customers Really More Valuable? The Moderating Role of Product Category Characteristics,” Journal of Marketing, 77 (4), 67–85.
72.
LabayDuncan G.KinnearThomas C. (1981), “Exploring the Consumer Decision Process in the Adoption of Solar Energy Systems,” Journal of Consumer Research, 8 (3), 271–278.
MayFrankMongaAshwani (2014), “When Time Has a Will of Its Own, the Powerless Don’t Have the Will to Wait: Anthropomorphism of Time Can Decrease Patience,” Journal of Consumer Research, 40 (5), 924–942.
79.
MendeMartinScottMaura L.DoornJenny vanGrewalDhruvShanksIlana (2019), “Service Robots Rising: How Humanoid Robots Influence Service Experiences and Elicit Compensatory Consumer Responses,” Journal of Marketing Research, 56 (4), 535–556.
80.
MeuterMatthew L.BitnerMary JoOstromAmy L.BrownStephen W. (2005), “Choosing Among Alternative Service Delivery Modes: An Investigation of Customer Trial of Self-Service Technologies,” Journal of Marketing, 69 (2), 61–83.
MooreGary C.BenbasatIzak (1991), “Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation,” Information Systems Research, 2 (3), 192–222.
84.
MorealeEmanuelaWattStuart (2004), “An Agent-Based Approach to Mailing List Knowledge Management,” in Agent-Mediated Knowledge Management, ElstLudger vanDignumVirginiaAbeckerAndreas, eds. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 2926, New York: Springer, 118–129.
85.
MorrisMichael G.VenkateshViswanath (2000), “Age Differences in Technology Adoption Decisions: Implications for a Changing Workforce,” Personnel Psychology, 53 (2), 375–403.
OlazabalA. MoralesCavaAnitaSacasasRene (2001), “Marketing and the Law,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33 (4), 116–118.
92.
OstlundLyman E. (1974), “Perceived Innovation Attributes as Predictors of Innovativeness,” Journal of Consumer Research, 1 (2), 23–29.
93.
PansariAnitaKumarV. (2017), “Customer Engagement: The Construct, Antecedents, and Consequences,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45 (3), 294–311.
94.
ParasuramanA.ColbyCharles L. (2015), “An Updated and Streamlined Technology Readiness Index: TRI 2.0,” Journal of Service Research, 18 (1), 59–74.
95.
ParasuramanA. (2000), “Technology Readiness Index (TRI): A Multiple-Item Scale to Measure Readiness to Embrace New Technologies,” Journal of Service Research, 2 (4), 307–320.
96.
ParasuramanA.BerryLeonard L.ZeithamlValarie A (1991), “Understanding Customer Expectations of Service,” Sloan Management Review, 32 (3), 39–48.
97.
ParasuramanA.ZeithamlValarie A.BerryLeonard L. (1988), “Servqual: A Multiple-Item Scale for Measuring Consumer Perceptions of Service Quality,” Journal of Retailing, 64 (1), 12–40.
98.
PellicciariM.AvotinsA.BengtssonK.BerselliG.BeyN.LennartsonB.MeikeD. (2015), “AREUS—Innovative Hardware and Software for Sustainable Industrial Robotics,” in Automation Science and Engineering (CASE), 2015 IEEE International Conference, 1325–1332.
PutrevuSanjayLordKenneth R. (1994), “Comparative and Noncomparative Advertising: Attitudinal Effects under Cognitive and Affective Involvement Conditions,” Journal of Advertising, 23 (2), 77–91.
103.
ReedAmericusIIForehandMark R.PuntoniStefanoWarlopLuk (2012), “Identity-Based Consumer Behavior,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 29 (4), 310–321.
104.
RogersEverett M. (1962), Diffusion of Innovations, 1st ed. New York: Free Press.
SirianniNancy J.BitnerMary JoBrownStephen W.MandelNaomi (2013), “Branded Service Encounters: Strategically Aligning Employee Behavior with the Brand Positioning,” Journal of Marketing, 77 (6), 108–123.
110.
SmithMichael D. (2002), “The Impact of Shopbots on Electronic Markets,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30 (4), 446–454.
111.
SpeierCheriVenkateshViswanath (2002), “The Hidden Minefields in the Adoption of Sales Force Automation Technologies,” Journal of Marketing, 66 (3), 98–111.
TanYvette (2017), “South Korea Could Be the First Country in the World to Implement a ‘Robot Tax’,” Mashable, August 10, (accessed September 20, 2019), [available athttps://mashable.com/2017/08/10/robots-south-korea].
114.
TanzerAndrewSimonRuth (1990), “Why Japan Loves Robots and We Don’t,” Forbes, 145 (8), 148–153.
115.
TaylorShirleyToddPeter (1995), “Decomposition and Crossover Effects in the Theory of Planned Behavior: A study of Consumer Adoption Intentions,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 12 (2), 137–155.
Toure-TilleryMaferimaMcGillAnn L. (2015), “Who or What to Believe: Trust and the Differential Persuasiveness of Human and Anthropomorphized Messengers,” Journal of Marketing, 79 (4), 94–110.
118.
Tractica (2017), “Customer Service Robots: Humanoid and Non-Humanoid Robots for Retail, Travel and Hospitality, Financial Services, Restaurants, Healthcare, and Other Customer-Facing Applications: Global Market Analysis and Forecasts,” Tractica, August, (accessed September 20, 2019), [available athttps://www.tractica.com].
119.
VenkateshViswanathBalaHillol (2008), “Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions,” Decision Sciences, 39 (2), 273–315.
120.
VenkateshViswanathMorrisMichael G.DavisGordon B.DavisFred D. (2003), “User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View,” MIS Quarterly, 27 (3), 425–478.
121.
VenkateshViswanathMorrisMichael G. (2000), “Why Don’t Men Ever Stop to Ask for Directions? Gender, Social Influence, and Their Role in Technology Acceptance and Usage Behavior,” MIS Quarterly, 24 (1), 115–138.
WangChenAndrea HoeggJoDahlDarren W. (2018), “The Impact of a Sales Team’s Perceived Entitativity on Customer Satisfaction,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 46 (2), 190–211.
124.
WaytzAdamNortonMichael I. (2014), “Botsourcing and Outsourcing: Robot, British, Chinese, and German Workers are for Thinking-Not Feeling-Jobs,” Emotion, 14 (2), 434–444.
125.
WeiZhi-GangMacwanAnil P.WieringaPeter A. (1998), “A Quantitative Measure for Degree of Automation and Its Relation to System Performance and Mental Load,” Human Factors, 40 (2), 277–295.
126.
WelchKeith A. (1999), “Development of a Tool for Assessing the Degree of Automation and Integration on Capital Projects,” Air Force Institute of Tech Wright-Patterson AFB, OH School of Engineering.
127.
WickensChristopher D.LiHuiyangSantamariaAmySebokAngeliaSarterNadine B. (2010), “Stages and Levels of Automation: An Integrated Meta-Analysis,” Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 54 (4), 389–393.
WünderlichNancy V.WangenheimFlorian V.BitnerMary Jo (2013), “High Tech and High Touch: A Framework for Understanding User Attitudes and Behaviors Related to Smart Interactive Services,” Journal of Service Research, 16 (1), 3–20.
132.
YangGuang-ZhongCambiasJamesClearyKevinDaimlerEricDrakeJamesDupontPierre E.HataNobuhikoKazanzidesPeterMartelSylvainPatelRajni V.SantosVeronica J.TaylorRussell H. (2017), “Medical Robotics—Regulatory, Ethical, and Legal Considerations for Increasing Levels of Autonomy,” Science Robotics, 2 (4), 8638.
133.
YoonYoungohcGuimaraesTorO’NealQuinton (1995), “Exploring the Factors Associated with Expert Systems Success,” MIS Quarterly, 19 (1), 83–106.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
