The use of service robots is on the rise. Characterized by technology autonomy with a physical embodiment, service robots have a higher level of social presence than other service technologies. This research focuses on one specific phenomenon of such social encounters: attribution of responsibility. Study 1 explores potential antecedents driving the attribution of responsibility in encounters with service robots. We derive a research model, which is tested and expanded in three subsequent scenario-based experiments. In Study 2, we find that technology’s autonomy decreases perceived behavioral control over the service robot, which in turn decreases perceived responsibility for positive outcomes but not for negative outcomes. Study 3 indicates that perceived ownership of the service robot accounts for the high responsibility for negative outcomes irrespective of perceived behavioral control. In Study 4, we show that the potential to interrupt the service robots’ autonomy increases perceived behavioral control and perceived responsibility for positive outcomes. Our results propose theoretical implications for responsibility perceptions and practical implications for customer satisfaction with service robots.
AbramsonLyn Y.SeligmanMartin E.TeasdaleJohn D. (1978), “Learned Helplessness in Humans: Critique and Reformulation,” Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 87 (1), 49–74.
2.
AgarwalRituPrasadJayesh (1997), “The Role of Innovation Characteristics and Perceived Voluntariness in the Acceptance of Information Technologies,” Decision Sciences, 28 (3), 557–582.
3.
AjzenIcek (2002), “Perceived Behavioral Control, Self-Efficacy, Locus of Control, and the Theory of Planned Behavior,” Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 80 (6), 2918–2940.
4.
AjzenIcek (1991), “The Theory of Planned Behavior,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50 (2), 179–211.
5.
AksoyLerzanBloomPaul N.LurieNicholas H.CooilBruce (2006), “Should Recommendation Agents Think Like People?” Journal of Service Research, 8 (4), 297–315.
6.
AlbrechtArne K.WalshGianfrancoBeattySharon E. (2017), “Perceptions of Group versus Individual Service Failures and Their Effects on Customer Outcomes: The Role of Attributions and Customer Entitlement,” Journal of Service Research, 20 (2), 188–203.
BardhiFleuraEckhardtGiana M. (2012, May16), “Access-Based Consumption: The Case of Car Sharing,” Journal of Consumer Research, 39 (4), 881–898.
10.
BardhiFleuraEckhardtGiana M.ArnouldEric J. (2012, January12), “Liquid Relationship to Possessions,” Journal of Consumer Research, 39 (3), 510–529.
11.
BatesonJ. E. G. (1985), “Self-Service Consumer—An Exploratory-Study,” Journal of Retailing, 61 (3), 49–76.
12.
BazeleyPatriciaJacksonKristi (2013), Qualitative Data Analysis with NVivo. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13.
BeerJenay M.FiskArthur D.RogersWendy A. (2014), “Toward a Framework for Levels of Robot Autonomy in Human-Robot Interaction,” Journal of Human-Robot Interaction, 3 (2), 74.
14.
BelkRussel (2017), “Consumers in an Age of Autonomous Robots,” in Contemporary Consumer Culture, SherryJ.FischerE., eds. London, UK: Routledge, 5–32.
15.
BendapudiNeeliLeoneRobert P. (2003), “Psychological Implications of Customer Participation in Co-Production,” Journal of Marketing, 67 (January), 14–28.
16.
BitnerMary Jo (1990), “Evaluating Service Encounters: The Effects of Physical Surroundings and Employee Responses,” Journal of Marketing, 54 (2), 69.
17.
BonnefonJean-FrancoisShariffAzimRahwanIyad (2016), “The Social Dilemma of Autonomous Vehicles,” Science, 352 (6293), 1573–1576.
18.
BottiSimonaMcGillAnn L. (2011), “The Locus of Choice: Personal Causality and Satisfaction with Hedonic and Utilitarian Decisions,” The Journal of Consumer Research, 37 (6), 1065–1078.
19.
BottiSimonaOrfaliKristinaIyengarSheena S. (2009), “Tragic Choices: Autonomy and Emotional Responses to Medical Decisions,” Journal of Consumer Research, 36 (3), 337–352.
20.
BottiSimonaMcGillAnn L. (2006), “When Choosing Is Not Deciding: The Effect of Perceived Responsibility on Satisfaction,” Journal of Consumer Research, 33 (2), 211–219.
21.
BottiSimonaLyengarSheena S. (2004), “The Psychological Pleasure and Pain of Choosing: When People Prefer Choosing at the Cost of Subsequent Outcome Satisfaction,” Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 87 (3), 312–326.
22.
BradleyGifford W. (1978), “Self-Serving Biases in the Attribution Process: A Reexamination of the Fact or Fiction Question,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36 (1), 56–71.
23.
BraunVirginiaClarkeVictoria (2006), “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology,” Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3 (2), 77–101.
ChoiSunmeeMattilaAnna S. (2008), “Perceived Controllability and Service Expectations: Influences on Customer Reactions Following Service Failure,” Journal of Business Research, 61 (1), 24–30.
26.
CollierJoel E.SherrellDaniel L. (2010), “Examining the Influence of Control and Convenience in a Self-Service Setting,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38 (4), 490–509.
27.
DeCharmsRichard (1968), Personal Causation—The Internal Affective Determinants of Behavior. New York: Academic Press.
28.
DengBoer (2015), “The Robot’s Dilemma,” Nature, 523 (7558), 24–26.
29.
DingXinVermaRohitIqbalZafar (2007), “Self-Service Technology and Online Financial Service Choice,” International Journal of Service Industry Management, 18 (3), 246–268.
FestingerLeon (1957), A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
32.
FishbeinMartinIcekAjzen (2009), Predicting and Changing Behavior: the Reasoned Action Approach. New York: Taylor & Francis.
33.
FritzMatthew S.MackinnonDavid P. (2007), “Required Sample Size to Detect the Mediated Effect,” Psychological Science, 18 (3), 233–239.
34.
FurbyLita (1978), “Possession in Humans: An Exploratory Study of Its Meaning and Motivation,” Social Behavior and Personality, 6 (1), 49–65.
35.
GasserMichael (2015), “Fundamental and Special Legal Questions for Autonomous Vehicles,” in Autonomous Driving: Technical, Legal and Social Aspects, MaurerM.LenzB.GerdesC.WinnerH., eds. Berlin, Germany: Springer Open, 523–551.
36.
GefenDavidKarahannaElenaStraubDetmar (2003), “Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model,” Management Information Systems Quarterly, 27 (1), 51–90.
37.
GiebelhausenMichaelRobinsonStacey G.SirianniNancy J.BradyMichael K. (2014), “Touch Versus Tech: When Technology Functions as a Barrier or a Benefit to Service Encounters,” Journal of Marketing, 78 (4), 113–124.
38.
Grenha TeixeiraJorgePatrícioLiaHsun HuangKoFiskRaymond P.NóbregaLeonelConstantineLarry (2017), “The MINDS Method: Integrating Management and Interaction Design Perspectives for Service Design,” Journal of Service Research, 20 (3), 240–258.
HayesAndrew F. (2015), “An Index and Test of Linear Moderated Mediation,” Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50(May), 1–22.
41.
HazéeSimonDelcourtCécileVaerenberghYves Van (2017), “Burdens of Access: Understanding Customer Barriers and Barrier-Attenuating Practices in Access-Based Services,” Journal of Service Research, 20 (4), 441–456.
42.
HeiderFritz (1958), The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. London, UK: Psychology Press.
43.
HelkkulaAnuKelleherCarolPihlstroMinna (2012), “Characterizing Value as an Experience: Implications for Service Researchers and Managers,” Journal of Service Research, 15 (1), 59–75.
44.
HuangMing-HuiRustRoland T. (2018), “Artificial Intelligence in Service,” Journal of Service Research, 21 (2), 155–172.
45.
HuangMing-HuiRustRoland T. (2017), “Technology-Driven Service Strategy,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45 (6), 906–924.
46.
HuiMichael K.BatesonJohn E. G. (1991), “Perceived Control and the Effects of Crowding and Consumer Choice on the Service Experience,” Journal of Consumer Research, 18 (2), 174–184.
47.
IglesiasVictor (2009), “The Attribution of Service Failures: Effects on Consumer Satisfaction,” The Service Industries Journal, 29 (2), 127–141.
48.
InesiM. EnaBottiSimonaDuboisDavidRuckerDerek D.GalinskyAdam D. (2011), “Power and Choice: their Dynamic Interplay in Quenching the Thirst for Personal Control,” Psychological Science, 22 (8), 1042–1048.
KalamasMariaLarocheMichelMakdessianLucy (2008), “Reaching the Boiling Point: Consumers’ Negative Affective Reactions to Firm-Attributed Service Failures,” Journal of Business Research, 61 (8), 813–824.
51.
KelleyHarold (1967), “Attribution Theory in Social Psychology,” in Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, Vol. 15, LevineD., ed. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 192–238.
52.
KleijnenMirellade RuyterKoAndreassenTor W. (2005), “Image Congruence and the Adoption of Service Innovations,” Journal of Service Research, 7 (4), 343–359.
53.
KrishnanS.ValleValerie A. (1979), “Dissatisfaction Attributions and Consumer Complaint Behavior,” in NA - Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 06, William L. Wilkie and Ann Abor, eds. MI: Association for Consumer Research, 445–449.
54.
KumarV.DixitAshutoshJavalgiRajshekar (Raj) G.DassMayukh (2016), “Research Framework, Strategies, and Applications of Intelligent Agent Technologies (IATs) in Marketing,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44 (1), 24–45.
LangeardEricBatesonJohn E. G.LovelockChristopher H.EiglierPierre (1981), Services Marketing: New Insights from Consumers and Managers. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.
57.
LemonKatherine N.VerhoefPeter C. (2016), “Understanding Customer Experience and the Customer Journey,” Journal of Marketing, 80 (JM-MSI Special Issue), 1–62.
58.
McknightD. HarrisonCarterMichelleThatcherJason BennettClayPaul F. (2011), “Trust in a Specific Technology,” ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems, 2 (2), 1–25.
MeuterMatthew L.BitnerMary JoOstromAmy L.BrownStephen W. (2005), “Choosing Among Alternative Service Delivery Modes: An Investigation of Customer Trial of Self-Service Technologies,” Journal of Marketing, 69 (2), 61–83.
MillerDale T.RossMichael (1975), “Self-Serving Biases in the Attribution of Causality: Fact or Fiction?” Psychological Bulletin, 82 (2), 213–225.
63.
MoonYoungme (2003), “Don’t Blame the Computer: When Self-Disclosure Moderates the Self-Serving Bias,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13 (1), 125–137.
64.
NassCliffordMoonYoungme (2000), “Machines and Mindlessness: Social Responses to Computers,” Journal of Social Issues, 56 (1), 81–103.
65.
OppenheimerDaniel M.MeyvisTomDavidenkoNicolas (2009), “Instructional Manipulation Checks: Detecting Satisficing to Increase Statistical Power,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45 (4), 867–872.
66.
PaluchStefanieBlutMarkus (2013), “Service Separation and Customer Satisfaction,” Journal of Service Research, 16 (3), 415–427.
67.
PattonMichael Quinn (2015), Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
68.
PeckJoannBargerVictor A.WebbAndrea (2013), “In Search of a Surrogate for Touch: The Effect of Haptic Imagery on Perceived Ownership,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23 (2), 189–196.
69.
PeckJoannShuSuzanne B. (2009), “The Effect of Mere Touch on Perceived Ownership,” Journal of Consumer Research, 36 (3), 434–447.
70.
PeerEyalSamatSonamBrandimarteLauraAcquistiAlessandro (2016), “Beyond the Turk: Alternative Platforms for Crowdsourcing Behavioral Research,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70 (January), 153–163.
71.
PierceJon L.KostovaTatianaDirksKurt T. (2003), “The State of Psychological Ownership: Integrating and Extending a Century of Research,” Review of General Psychology, 7 (1), 84–107.
72.
PierceJon L.KostovaTatianaDirksKurt T. (2001), “Toward a Theory of Psychological Ownership in Organizations,” Academy of Management Review, 26 (2), 298–310.
73.
PreacherKristopher J.RuckerDerek D.HayesAndrew F. (2007), “Addressing Moderated Mediation Hypotheses: Theory, Methods, and Prescriptions,” Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42 (1), 185–227.
74.
RafaeliAnatAltmanDanielGremlerDwayne D.HuangMing HuiGrewalDhruvIyerBalaParasuramanA.Kode Ruyter (2017), “The Future of Frontline Research: Invited Commentaries,” Journal of Service Research, 20 (1), 91–99.
75.
ReindersMachiel J.DabholkarPrathiba A.FrambachRuud T. (2008), “Consequences of Forcing Customers to Use Technology Based Self Service,” Journal of Service Research, 11 (2), 107–123.
76.
RijsdijkSerge A.HultinkErik Jan (2009), “How Today’s Consumers Perceive Tomorrow’s Smart Products,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26 (1), 24–42.
77.
RijsdijkSerge A.HultinkErik Jan (2003), “‘Honey, Have You Seen Our Hamster?’ Consumer Evaluations of Autonomous Domestic Products,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 20 (3), 204–216.
78.
RotterJulian B. (1966), “Generalized Expectancies for Internal versus External Control of Reinforcement,” Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80 (1), 1–28.
79.
RustRoland T.HuangMing-Hui (2014), “The Service Revolution and the Transformation of Marketing Science,” Marketing Science, 33 (2), 206–221.
80.
SchweitzerFionaHendeEllis van den (2016), “To Be or Not to Be in Thrall to the March of Smart Products,” Psychology & Marketing, 33 (10), 830–842.
81.
SiegelMikeyBreazealCynthiaNortonMichael I. (2009), “Persuasive Robotics: The Influence of Robot Gender on Human Behavior,” in Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, St. Louis, MO, 2563–2568.
82.
SierraJeremy J.HeiserRobert S.McQuittyShaun (2009), “Exploring Determinants and Effects of Shared Responsibility in Service Exchanges,” The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 17 (2), 111–128.
83.
SimmonsReidGoldbergDaniGoodeAdamMontemerloMichaelSellnerBrennanUrmsonChrisSchultzAlan, et al. (2003), “An Autonomous Robot for the AAAI Robot Challenge,” AI Magazine, 24 (2), 51–72.
84.
ThrunSebastian (2004), “Towards A Framework for Human-Robot Interaction,” Human-Computer Interaction, 19 (1), 9–24.
85.
TsirosMichaelMittalVikasRossWilliam T. (2004), “The Role of Attributions in Customer Satisfaction: A Reexamination,” Journal of Consumer Research, 31 (2), 476–483.
86.
van DoornJennyMendeMartinNobleStephanie M.HullandJohnOstromAmy L.GrewalDhruvAndrew PetersenJ. (2017), “Domo Arigato Mr. Roboto: Emergence of Automated Social Presence in Organizational Frontlines and Customers’ Service Experiences,” Journal of Service Research, 20 (1), 43–58.
87.
Van DyneLinnPierceJon L. (2004), “Psychological Ownership and Feelings of Possession: Three Field Studies Predicting Employee Attitudes and Organizational Citizenship Behavior,” Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25 (4), 439–459.
88.
VargoStephen L.LuschRobert F. (2004), “Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing,” Journal of Marketing, 68 (1), 1–17.
89.
VriensM.LoosschilderG. H.RosbergenE.WittinkD. R. (1998), “Verbal versus Realistic Pictorial Representations in Conjoint Analysis with Design Attributes,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15 (1), 455–467.
90.
WaytzAdamHeafnerJoyEpleyNicholas (2014), “The Mind in the Machine: Anthropomorphism Increases Trust in an Autonomous Vehicle,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 52 (3), 113–117.
91.
WeijtersBertRangarajanDevarajanFalkTomasSchillewaertNiels (2007), “Determinants and Outcomes of Customers’ Use of Self-Service Technology in a Retail Setting,” Journal of Service Research, 10 (1), 3–21.
92.
WeinerBernard (2000), “Attributional Thoughts about Consumer Behavior,” Journal of Consumer Research, 27 (3), 382–387.
93.
WeinerBernard (1980), “A Cognitive (Attribution)-Emotion-Action Model of Motivated Behavior: An Analysis of Judgments of Help-Giving.,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39 (2), 186–200.
94.
WeinerBernard (1979), “A Theory of Motivation for Some Classroom Experiences,” Journal of Education & Psychology, 71 (1), 3–25.
95.
WhiteRobert W. (1959), “Motivation Reconsidered: the Concept of Competence,” Psychological Review, 66 (5), 297–333.
96.
WirtzJochenPattersonPaul G.KunzWerner H.GruberThorstenLuVinh NhatPaluchStefanieMartinsAntje (2018), “Brave New World: Service Robots in the Frontline,” Journal of Service Management, 29 (2), 907–931.
97.
WitzelAndreasReiterHerwig (2012), The Problem-Centred Interview: Principles and Practice.
98.
WolfIngo (2015), “The Interaction between Humans and Autonomous Agents,” in Autonomous Driving: Technical, Legal and Social Aspects, MaurerM.LenzB.GerdesC.WinnerH., eds. Berlin, Germany: Springer Open, 103–124.
99.
WolfMarcoMcQuittyShaun (2011), “Understanding the Do-It-Yourself Consumer: DIY Motivations and Outcomes,” AMS Review, 1 (3-4), 154–170.
100.
WünderlichNancy V.WangenheimFlorian V.BitnerMary J. (2013), “High Tech and High Touch: A Framework for Understanding User Attitudes and Behaviors Related to Smart Interactive Services,” Journal of Service Research, 16 (1), 3–20.
101.
ZhuZhenNakataCherylSivakumarK.GrewalDhruv (2007), “Self-Service Technology Effectiveness: the Role of Design Features and Individual Traits,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 35 (4), 492–506.
102.
ZuckermanMiron (1979), “Attribution of Success and Failure Revisited, or: The Motivational Bias Is Alive and Well in Attribution Theory,” Journal of Personality, 47 (2), 245–287.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
