Considerable managerial and academic interest has made engagement a key priority in marketing and service research, spurring a rapidly increasing body of literature on this topic. Academic research initially explored customer engagement (CE) and customer engagement behavior within the firm-customer dyad. Recent developments suggest a need to broaden the conceptual domain of CE not only from the focal subject of customers/consumers to a general actor-to-actor perspective but also from the firm-customer dyad to relationships among multiple actors in service ecosystems. Hence, the purpose of this article is to bring a broadened definition to the conceptual domain of actor engagement (AE) in networks. Our theorizing process adopted a propositional conceptual approach that built on CE research and was guided by the general theoretical perspective of service-dominant logic. The critical contribution of the article lies in its systematic development of the conceptual domain of AE and the potential this development has for guiding knowledge development and cross-fertilization in various research fields, including customer, work, citizen, and business engagement. We provide a definition of AE and five fundamental propositions that embody a broader network perspective of engagement and conclude by discussing an agenda for future research that illustrates its managerial relevance.
AlexanderMatthewJaakkolaElinaHollebeekLinda D. (2018), “Zooming Out: Actor Engagement Beyond the Dyadic,” Journal of Service Management, 29 (3), 333–351.
2.
AzerJaylanAlexanderMatthew J. (2018), “Conceptualizing Negatively Valenced Influencing Behavior: Forms and Triggers,” Journal of Service Management, 29 (3), 468–490.
3.
BaldusBrian J.VoorheesClayCalantoneRoger (2015), “Online Brand Community Engagement: Scale Development and Validation,” Journal of Business Research, 68 (5), 978–985.
4.
BattilanaJulieD’aunnoThomas (2009), “Institutional Work and the Paradox of Embedded Agency,” in Institutional Work: Actors and Agency in Institutional Studies of Organizations, LawrenceT. B.SuddabyR.LecaB., eds. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 31–58.
5.
BellSimon J.AuhSeigyoungSmalleyKaren (2005), “Customer Relationship Dynamics: Service Quality and Customer Loyalty in the Context of Varying Levels of Customer Expertise and Switching Costs,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33 (2), 169–183.
6.
BenoitSabineScherschelKatrinAtesZelalNasrLindaKandampullyJay (2017), “Showcasing the Diversity of Service Research,” Journal of Service Management, 28 (5), 810–836.
7.
BourdieuPierre (1990), The logic of practice. Stanford University Press.
8.
BowdenJana L. H.ConduitJodieHollebeekLinda D.Luoma-AhoVilmaSolemBirgit (2017), “Engagement Valence Duality and Spillover Effects in Online Brand Communities,” Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 27 (4), 877–897.
9.
BowdenJana L.-H.Luoma-AhoVilmaNaumannKay (2016), “Developing a Spectrum of Positive to Negative Citizen Engagement,” in Customer Engagement: Contemporary Issues and Challenges, BrodieR.HollebeekL. D.ConduitJ., eds. Singapore: Routledge, 257–277.
10.
BowdenJana L.-H. (2009), “The Process of Customer Engagement: A Conceptual Framework,” The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 17 (1), 63–74.
11.
BreidbachChristophBrodieRoderick J. (2017), “Engagement Platforms in the Sharing Economy: Conceptual Foundations and Research Directions,” Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 27 (4), 761–777.
12.
BreidbachChristophBrodieRoderick J.HollebeekLinda D. (2014), “Beyond Virtuality. From Engagement Platforms to Engagement Ecosystems,” Managing Service Quality, 24 (6), 592–611.
13.
BrodieR. J.FehrerJ.JaakkolaE.HollebeekL.ConduitJ. (2016), “From customer to actor engagement: Exploring a broadened conceptual domain,” in 45th European Marketing Academy Conference (EMAC), Oslo, Norway, 24–27 May.
14.
BrodieRoderick J.IlicAnaJuricBiljanaHollebeekLinda (2013), “Consumer Engagement in a Virtual Brand Community: An Exploratory Analysis,” Journal of Business Research, 66 (1), 105–114.
15.
BrodieRoderick J.HollebeekLinda D.JuricBiljanaIlicAna (2011), “Customer Engagement: Conceptual Domain, Fundamental Propositions, and Implications for Research,” Journal of Service Research, 14 (3), 252–271.
16.
CalderBobby J.MalthouseEdward C.SchaedelUte (2009), “An Experimental Study of the Relationship between Online Engagement and Advertising Effectiveness,” Journal of Interactive Marketing, 23 (4), 321–331.
17.
ChandlerJ. D.LuschR. F. (2015), “Service Systems: A Broadened Framework and Research Agenda on Value Propositions, Engagement, and Service Experience,” Journal of Service Research, 18 (1), 6–22.
18.
ChandlerJ. D.VargoS. L. (2011), “Contextualization and Value-in-context: How Context Frames Exchange,” Marketing Theory, 11 (1), 35–49.
19.
ConduitJodieKarpenIngo O.FarrellyFrancis (2016), “Student Engagement: A Multiple Layer Phenomenon,” in Making a Difference Through Marketing: A quest for different perspectives, PlewaCarolinConduitJodie, eds. Singapore: Springer, 229–245.
20.
CornelissenJoep P. (2017), “Editor’s Comments: Developing Propositions, a Process Model, or a Typology? Addressing the Challenges of Writing Theory Without a Boilerplate,” Academy of Management Review, 42 (1), 1–9.
21.
DessartLaurenceVeloutsouCleopatraMorgan-ThomasAnna (2015), “Consumer Engagement in Online Brand Communities: A Social Media Perspective,” Journal of Product & Brand Management, 24 (1), 28–42.
22.
DwivediAbhishek (2015), “A Higher-Order Model of Consumer Brand Engagement and Its Impact on Loyalty Intentions,” Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 24 (C), 100–109.
EdvardssonBoTronvollBårdGruberThorsten (2011), “Expanding Understanding of Service Exchange and Value Co-creation: A Social Construction Approach,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39 (2), 327–339.
26.
FehrerJulia A.WoratschekHerbertGermelmannClaas C.BrodieRoderick J. (2018), “Dynamics and Drivers of Customer Engagement: Within the Dyad and Beyond,” Journal of Service Management, 29 (3), 443–467.
27.
FehrerJulia A.WoratschekHerbertBrodieRoderick J. (2018), “A Systemic Logic for Platform Business Models,” Journal of Service Management, 29 (4), 546–568.
28.
GiddensAnthony (1984), The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
29.
GillManpreetSridharShrihariGrewalRajdeep (2017), “Return on Engagement Initiatives: A Study of a Business-to-Business Mobile App,” Journal of Marketing, 81 (4), 45–66.
30.
HarmelingColleen M.MoffettJordan W.ArnoldMark J.CarlsonBrad D. (2016), “Toward a Theory of Customer Engagement Marketing,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45 (3), 312–335.
31.
HollebeekLinda D.SrivastavaRajendra K.ChenTom (2016), “S-D Logic–informed Customer Engagement: Integrative Framework, Revised Fundamental Propositions, and Application to CRM,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. doi:10.1007/s11747-016-0494-5
32.
HollebeekLinda D.GlynnMark S.BrodieRoderick J. (2014), “Consumer Brand Engagement in Social Media: Conceptualization, Scale Development and Validation,” Journal of Interactive Marketing, 28 (2), 149–165.
33.
JaakkolaElinaAarikka-StenroosLeena (2018), “Customer Referencing as Business Actor Engagement Behavior–Creating Value in and Beyond Triadic Settings,” Industrial Marketing Management. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.06.014
34.
JaakkolaElinaConduitJodieFehrerJulia A. (2018), “Tracking the Evolution of Engagement Research: Illustration of Midrange Theory in the Service Dominant Paradigm,” in Sage Handbook of Service-Dominant Logic, LuschRobert F.VargoStephen L., eds. London: Sage, 580–598.
35.
JaakkolaElinaAlexanderMatthew (2014), “The Role of Customer Engagement Behavior in Value Co-Creation: A Service System Perspective,” Journal of Service Research, 17 (3), 247–261.
36.
JonasJulia M.BohaJulianSörhammarDavidMoesleinKathrin M. (2018), “Stakeholder Engagement in Intra-and Inter-organizational Innovation: Exploring Antecedents of Engagement in Service Ecosystems,” Journal of Service Management, 29 (3), 399–421.
37.
KeelingDebbie I.LaingAngusRuyterKo de (2018), “Evolving Roles and Structures of Triadic Engagement in Healthcare,” Journal of Service Management, 29 (3), 352–377.
38.
Koskela-HuotariKaisaVargoStephen L. (2016), “Institutions as Resource Context,” Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 26 (2), 163–178.
39.
KozinetsRobert V. (2014), “Social Brand Engagement: A New Idea,” GfK Marketing Intelligence Review, 6 (2), 8–15.
40.
KumarV.RajanBharathGuptaShaphaliPozzaIlaria D. (2017), “Customer Engagement in Service,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 47 (1), 138–160.
41.
KumarV.PansariAnita (2016), “Competitive Advantage Through Engagement,” Journal of Marketing Research, 53 (4), 497–514.
42.
KumarV.AksoyL.DonkersB.VenkatesanR.WieselT.TillmannsS. (2010), “Undervalued or Overvalued Customers: Capturing Total Customer Engagement Value,” Journal of Service Research, 13 (3), 297–310.
43.
LaudGaurangiKarpenIngo O.MulyeRajendraRahmanKaleel (2015), “The Role of Embeddedness for Resource Integraton: Complementing SD Logic Research through a Social Capital Perspective,” Marketing Theory, 15 (4), 509–543.
44.
LiLoicJuricBiljanaBrodieRoderick J. (2017), “al of Service Theory and Practice Dynamic Multi-actor Engagement in Networks: The Case of United Breaks Guitars,” Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 27 (4), 738–760.
45.
LuschRobert F.VargoStephen L. (2014), Service-Dominant Logic: Premises, Perspectives, Possibilities. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
46.
MaglioPaul P.SpohrerJim (2008), “Fundamentals of Service Science,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36 (1), 18–20.
47.
MalhotraArvindMalhotraClaudia K.SeeAlan (2013), “How to Create Brand Engagement on Facebook,” MIT Sloan Management Review, 54 (2), 18.
48.
Marcos-CuevasJavierNättiSatuPaloTeeaBaumannJasmin (2016), “Value Co-creation Practices and Capabilities: Sustained Purposeful Engagement Across B2B Systems,” Industrial Marketing Management, 56 (7), 97–107.
NguyenLong T. V.JodieConduitVinhNhat LuSallyRao Hill (2016), “Engagement in online communities: implications for consumer price perceptions,” Journal of Strategic Marketing, 24 (3-4), 241–260.
51.
OrlikowskiWanda J. (2010), “Practice in Research: Phenomenon, Perspective and Philosophy,” Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice, GolsorkhiD.RouleauL.SeidlD.VaaraE., eds. New York: Cambridge University Press, 23–33.
52.
PansariAnitaKumarV. (2016), “Customer Engagement: The Construct, Antecedents, and Consequences,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45 (3), 294–311.
53.
ReinartzWerner J.BerkmannManuel (2018), “From Customer to Partner Engagement: A Conceptualization and Typology of Engagement in B2B,” in Customer Engagement Marketing, PalmatierRobert W.KumarV.HarmelingColleen M., eds. Cham: Springer, 243–268.
54.
SchaufeliWilmar B.SalanovaMarisa (2002), “The Measurement of Engagement and Burnout: A Two Sample Confirmatory Factor Analytic Approach,” Journal of Happiness Studies, 3 (1), 71–92.
55.
ScottW. R. (2001), Institutions and Organizations, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
56.
SimMaxConduitJodiePlewaCarolin (2018), “Engagement within a Service System: A Fuzzy Set Analysis in a Higher Education Setting,” Journal of Service Management, 29 (3), 422–442.
57.
StorbackaKajBrodieRoderick J.BöhmannTiloMaglioPaul P.NenonenSuvi (2016), “Actor Engagement as a Microfoundation for Value Co-creation,” Journal of Business Research, 69 (8), 3008–3017.
58.
TaillardMariePetersLinda D.PelsJaqueline (2016), “The Role of Shared Intentions in the Emergence of Service Ecosystems,” Journal of Business Research, 69 (8), 2972–2980.
59.
TeeceDavid J. (2007), “Explicating Dynamic Capabilities: The Nature and Microfoundations of (Sustainable) Enterprise Performance,” Strategic Management Journal, 28 (13), 1319–1350.
60.
van DoornJ.LemonK. N.MittalV.NassS.PickD.PirnerP.VerhoefP. C. (2010), “Customer Engagement Behavior: Theoretical Foundations and Research Directions,” Journal of Service Research, 13 (3), 253–266.
61.
VargoStephen L.LuschRobert F. (2017), “Service-dominant Logic 2025,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 34 (1), 46–67.
62.
VargoStephen L.LuschRobert F. (2016), “Institutions and Axioms: An Extension and Update of Service-dominant Logic,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44 (1), 5–23.
63.
VargoStephen L. (2011), “Market Systems, Stakeholders and Value Propositions,” European Journal of Marketing, 45 (1/2), 217–222.
64.
VargoStephen L.LuschRobert F. (2011), “It’s all B2B…and Beyond: Toward a Systems Perspective of the Market,” Industrial Marketing Management, 40 (2), 181–187.
65.
VargoStephen L.LuschRobert F. (2008), “Service-dominant Logic: Continuing the Evolution,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36 (1), 1–10.
66.
VargoStephen L.LuschRobert F. (2004), “Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing,” Journal of Marketing, 68 (1), 1–17.
VerhoefP. C.ReinartzW. J.KrafftM. (2010), “Customer Engagement as a New Perspective in Customer Management,” Journal of Service Research, 13 (3), 247–252.
69.
VerleyeK.GemmelP.RangarajanD. (2014), “Managing Engagement Behaviors in a Network of Customers and Stakeholders: Evidence From the Nursing Home Sector,” Journal of Service Research, 17 (1), 68–84.
70.
VivekShiri D.VivekDanelaBeattySharon E. (2016), “Partner Engagement: A Perspective on B2B Engagement,” in Customer Engagement: Contemporary Issues and Challenges, BrodieR.HollebeekL. D.ConduitJ., eds. Singapore: Routledge, 53–66.
71.
VivekShiri D.BeattySharon E.DalelaVivekMorganRobert M. (2014), “A Generalized Multidimensional Scale for Measuring Customer Engagement,” The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 22 (4), 401–420.
72.
VivekShiri D.BeattySharon E.MorganRobert M. (2012), “Customer Engagement: Exploring Customer Relationships Beyond Purchase,” The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 20 (2), 122–146.
73.
WielandHeikoHartmannNathaniel N.VargoStephen L. (2017), “Business models as service strategy,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45 (6), 925–943.
74.
WildenRalfAkakaMelissa A.KarpenIngo O.HohbergerJan (2017), “The Evolution and Prospects of Service-Dominant Logic: An Investigation of Past, Present, and Future Research,” Journal of Service Research, 20 (4), 345–361.
75.
YamagishiToshioGillmoreMary R.CookKaren S. (1988), “Network Connections and the Distribution of Power in Exchange Networks,” American Journal of Sociology, 93 (4), 833–851.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
