What Makes Service Research Centers Effective?

Abstract

Academic service research centers have been positioned as a research partner for service companies. In this article, the authors present a framework for assessing their effectiveness. The results of an empirical study conducted during 2 years suggest that user satisfaction is central to establishing decision maker trust, as well as promoting the use of the information. In both years, quality of content and researcher characteristics were identified as key drivers of satisfaction. In the initial stage of the relationship between the service research center and the client firm, information use is also driven by the political acceptability of the information. It was found that trust had no effect on information use. However, the results of the second year suggest that particularly trust in the researcher becomes a crucial factor as the relationship develops, because it directly affects the use of information by academic service research centers.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson, J. C. and D. W. Gerbing (1988), “Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach,” Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411-423.

de Ruyter, K. , J. Bloemer , and P. Peeters (1997), “Merging Service Quality and Service Satisfaction: An Empirical Test of an Integrative Model,” Journal of Economic Psychology, 18, 387-406.

de Ruyter, K. and M. Wetzels (2000), “The Impact of Perceived Listening Behavior in Voice-to-Voice Service Encounters,” Journal of Service Research, 2 (3), 276-284.

Deshpandé, R. and G. Zaltman (1982), “Factors Affecting the Use of Market Research Information: A Path Analysis,” Journal of Marketing Research, 19 (February), 14-31.

Deshpandé, R. and G. Zaltman (1984), “A Comparison of Factors Affecting Researcher and Manager Perceptions of Market Research Use,” Journal of Marketing Research, 21 (February), 32-38.

Deshpandé, R. and G. Zaltman (1985), “The Use of Market Research in Industrial Organizations,” in A Strategic Approach to Business Marketing, R. Spekman and D. Wilson , eds. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 58-66.

Deshpandé, R. and G. Zaltman (1987), “A Comparison of Factors Affecting Use of Marketing Information in Consumer and Industrial Firms,” Journal of Marketing Research, 24 (February), 114-118.

Feldman, M. S. and J. G. March (1981), “Information in Organizations as Signal and Symbol,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 26 (2), 171-186.

Hu, L. and P. M. Bentler (1995), “Evaluating Model Fit,” in Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications, R.H. Hoyle , ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 76-99.

10.

Kohli, A. and B. J. Jaworski (1990), Market Orientation: The Construct, Research Propositions, and Managerial Implications. Report No. 90-113. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.

11.

Krishnan, S. (1989), Making More Effective Use of Market Information: A Conference Summary. Report No. 89-113. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.

12.

Maltz, E. and A. K. Kohli (1996), “Market Intelligence Dissemination across Functional Boundaries,” Journal of Marketing Research,33 (February), 47-61.

13.

Menon, A. and R. Varadarajan (1992), “A Model of Marketing Knowledge Use within Firms,” Journal of Marketing, 56 (October), 53-71.

14.

Menon, A. and J. Wilcox (1994), USER: A Scale to Measure Use of Market Research. Report No. 94-108. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.

15.

Moorman, C. and J. Austin (1995), The Paradox of Low Quality and High Use: How Research Trust Impacts Market Research Outcomes.Report No. 95-116. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.

16.

Moorman, C. , R. Deshpandé , and G. Zaltman (1993), “Factors Affecting Trust in Market Research Relationships,” Journal of Marketing, 57 (January), 81-101.

17.

Moorman, C. , G. Zaltman , and R. Deshpandé (1992), “Relationships between Providers and Users of Market Research: The Dynamics of Trust within and between Organizations,” Journal of Marketing Research, 29 (August), 314-328.

18.

Netemeyer, R. G. , M. W. Johnston , and S. Burton (1990), “Analysis of Role Conflict and Role Ambiguity in a Structural Equations Framework,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 148-157.

19.

van Birgelen, M. , K. de Ruyter , and M. Wetzels (2001), “What Factors Determine Use of Quality-Related Marketing Research Information? An Empirical Investigation,” Total Quality Management, forthcoming.

20.

Webster, F. E. Jr. (1978), “Is Industrial Marketing Coming of Age?,” in Review of Marketing, T. V. Bonoma and G. Zaltman , eds. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 138-159.

21.

Wetzels, M. , K. de Ruyter , and M. van Birgelen (1998), “Marketing Service Relationships: The Role of Commitment,” Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 13 (4/5), 406-423.