Scholars conduct systematic literature reviews to summarize knowledge and identify gaps in understanding. Machine learning can assist researchers in carrying out these studies. This paper introduces a machine learning toolkit that employs Network Analysis and Natural Language Processing methods to extract textual features and categorize academic papers. The toolkit comprises two algorithms that enable researchers to: (a) select relevant studies for a given theme; and (b) identify the main topics within that theme. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our toolkit by analyzing three streams of literature: cobranding, coopetition, and the psychological resilience of entrepreneurs. By comparing the results obtained through our toolkit with previously published literature reviews, we highlight its advantages in enhancing transparency, coherence, and comprehensiveness in literature reviews. We also provide quantitative evidence about the toolkit's efficacy in addressing the challenges inherent in conducting a literature review, as compared with state-of-the-art Natural Language Processing methods. Finally, we discuss the critical role of researchers in implementing and overseeing a literature review aided by our toolkit.
Adame-SánchezC.CaplliureE. M.Miquel-RomeroM. J. (2018). Paving the way for coopetition: Drivers for work–life balance policy implementation. Review of Managerial Science, 12(2), 519–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-017-0271-y
2.
AlbalawiR.YeapT. H.BenyoucefM. (2020). Using topic modeling methods for short-text data: A comparative analysis. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 3(42), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2020.00042
3.
AlghamdiR.AlfalqiK. (2015). A survey of topic modeling in text mining. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 6(1), 147–194. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2015.060121
4.
AnderbergM. R. (1973). Cluster analysis for applications. Academic Press.
5.
AndreiniD.BettinelliC.PedelientoG.ApaR. (2020). How do consumers see firms’ family nature? A review of the literature. Family Business Review, 33(1), 18–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486519890229
6.
AndreottaM.NugrohoR.HurlstoneM. J.BoschettiF.FarrellS.WalkerI.ParisC. (2019). Analyzing social media data: A mixed-methods framework combining computational and qualitative text analysis. Behavior Research Methods, 51, 1766–1781. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01202-8
AntonsD.BreidbachC. F.JoshiA. M.SalgeT. O. (2023). Computational literature reviews: Method, algorithms, and roadmap. Organizational Research Methods, 26(1), 107–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428121991230
9.
BelfordM.Mac NameeB.GreeneD. (2018). Stability of topic modeling via matrix factorization. Expert Systems with Applications, 91, 159–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2017.08.047
10.
BelkR. W. (Eds.). (2007). Handbook of qualitative research methods in marketing. Edward Elgar Publishing.
11.
BengtssonM.KockS. (2014). Coopetition—Quo vadis? Past accomplishments and future challenges. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(2), 180–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2014.02.015
12.
BenjaminiY.HochbergY. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 57(1), 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x
13.
BenjaminiY.YekutieliD. (2001). The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency. The Annals of Statistics, 29(4), 1165–1188. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1013699998
14.
BhatiaS.LauJ. H.BaldwinT. (2018). Topic intrusion for automatic topic model evaluation. Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Brussels, Belgium, pp. 844–849. Association for Computational Linguistics.
BounckenR. B.GastJ.KrausS.BogersM. (2015). Coopetition: A systematic review, synthesis, and future research directions. Review of Managerial Science, 9, 577–601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-015-0168-6
17.
BrandenburgerA. M.NalebuffB. J. (1996). Co-opetition. Doubleday.
18.
BraselS. A.GipsJ. (2011). Red bull “gives you wings” for better or worse: A double-edged impact of brand exposure on consumer performance. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 21(1), 57–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2010.09.008
19.
BrielmaierC.FrieslM. (2022). The attention-based view: Review and conceptual extension towards situated attention. International Journal of Management Reviews, 25(1), 99–129. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12306
20.
BrinerR. B.DenyerD. (2012). Systematic review and evidence synthesis as a practice and scholarship tool. In Handbook of evidence-based management: Companies, classrooms and research (pp. 112–129). Oxford Handbooks Online.
21.
BrinerR. B.DenyerD.RousseauD. M. (2009). Evidence-based management: Concept cleanup time?Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(4), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMP.2009.45590138
22.
BundyJ.PfarrerM. D.ShortC. E.CoombsW. T. (2017). Crises and crisis management: Integration, interpretation, and research development. Journal of Management, 43(6), 1661–1692. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316680030
23.
CheahI.ZainolZ.PhauI. (2016). Conceptualizing country-of-ingredient authenticity of luxury brands. Journal of Business Research, 69(12), 5819–5826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.179
24.
ChenP.ZhangN. L.LiuT.PoonL. K.ChenZ.KhawarF. (2017). Latent tree models for hierarchical topic detection. Artificial Intelligence, 250, 105–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2017.06.004
ChiaoY. C.LinC. C.HuangC. J. (2021). Competing and cooperating globally: How firms’ multimarket contact relates to joint price elevation in coopetition networks. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 36(9), 1678–1691. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-01-2020-0063
27.
ChowdharyK. (2020). Fundamentals of artificial intelligence. Springer.
CrickJ. M. (2019). Moderators affecting the relationship between coopetition and company performance. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 34(2), 518–531. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-03-2018-0102
30.
CrickJ. M.CrickD. (2021). The dark-side of coopetition: Influences on the paradoxical forces of cooperativeness and competitiveness across product-market strategies. Journal of Business Research, 122, 226–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.08.065
31.
CunliffeA. L. (2003). Reflexive inquiry in organizational research: Questions and possibilities. Human Relations, 56(8), 983–1003. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267030568004
32.
CuriskisS. A.DrakeB.OsbornT. R.KennedyP. J. (2020). An evaluation of document clustering and topic modelling in two online social networks: Twitter and Reddit. Information Processing & Management, 57(2), 102034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2019.04.002
33.
DagninoG. B.MinàA. (2018). The swinging pendulum of coopetition inquiry. In Routledge companion to coopetition strategies (pp. 68–80). Routledge.
34.
DagninoG. B.MinàA. (2021). Unraveling the philosophical foundations of coopetition strategy. Management and Organization Review, 17(3), 490–523. https://doi.org/10.1017/mor.2020.68
35.
DagninoG. B.PiconeP. M.FerrignoG. (2021). Temporary competitive advantage: A state-of-the-art literature review and research directions. International Journal of Management Reviews, 23(1), 85–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12242
36.
DebellisF.RondiE.PlakoyiannakiE.De MassisA. (2021). Riding the waves of family firm internationalization: A systematic literature review, integrative framework, and research agenda. Journal of World Business, 56(1), 101144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2020.101144
37.
DeckerC.BaadeA. (2016). Consumer perceptions of co-branding alliances: Organizational dissimilarity signals and brand fit. Journal of Brand Management, 23(6), 648–665. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41262-016-0013-5
38.
DeveceC.Ribeiro-SorianoD. E.Palacios-MarquésD. (2019). Coopetition as the new trend in inter-firm alliances: Literature review and research patterns. Review of Managerial Science, 13(2), 207–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-017-0245-0
39.
DumaisS. T.FurnasG. W.LandauerT. K.DeerwesterS.HarshmanR. (1988). Using latent semantic analysis to improve access to textual information. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 281–285.
40.
DurandR.GrantR. M.MadsenT. L. (2017). The expanding domain of strategic management research and the quest for integration. Strategic Management Journal, 38(1), 4–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2607
41.
EggerR.YuJ. (2022). A topic modeling comparison between LDA, NMF, Top2Vec, and BERTopic to demystify twitter posts. Frontiers in Sociology, 7, 886498. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2022.886498
42.
FanD.BreslinD.CallahanJ. L.Iszatt-WhiteM. (2022). Advancing literature review methodology through rigour, generativity, scope and transparency. International Journal of Management Reviews, 24(2), 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12291
43.
GnyawaliD. R.ParkB. J. R. (2011). Co-opetition between giants: Collaboration with competitors for technological innovation. Research Policy, 40(5), 650–663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.01.009
44.
GreenhalghT. (1997). How to read a paper: Papers that summarise other papers (systematic reviews and meta-analyses). Bmj, 315(7109), 672–675. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7109.672
45.
GriffithsT. L.SteyversM. (2004). Finding scientific topics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101(suppl_1), 5228–5235. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0307752101
46.
HahmS. P.KhanM. A. (2001). Co-branding strategy in the restaurant industry. Journal of Hospitality & Leisure Marketing, 8(1-2), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1300/J150v08n01_05
47.
Haibe-KainsB.AdamG. A.HosnyA.KhodakaramiF.ShraddhaT.KuskoR.SansoneS.-A.TongW.WolfingerR. D.MasonC. E.JonesW.DopazoJ.FurlanelloC.WaldronL.WangB.McIntoshC.GoldenbergA.KundajeA.GreeneC. S.…AertsH. J. W. L. (2020). Transparency and reproducibility in artificial intelligence. Nature, 586(7829), E14–E16. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2766-y
48.
HartmannS.BackmannJ.NewmanA.BrykmanK. M.PidduckR. J. (2022). Psychological resilience of entrepreneurs: A review and agenda for future research. Journal of Small Business Management, 60(5), 1041–1079. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2021.2024216
49.
HatzopoulosV.IoriG.MantegnaR. N.MiccichèS.TumminelloM. (2015). Quantifying preferential trading in the e-MID interbank market. Quantitative Finance, 15(4), 693–710. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697688.2014.969889
50.
HieblM. R. (2023). Sample selection in systematic literature reviews of management research. Organizational Research Methods, 26(2), 229–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428120986851
51.
HofmannT. (1999). Probabilistic latent semantic indexing. Proceedings of the 22nd Annual ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 50–57.
52.
HovyD.PrabhumoyeS. (2021). Five sources of bias in natural language processing. Language and Linguistics Compass, 15(8), e12432. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12432
53.
IlicicJ.BaxterS. (2014). Fit in celebrity–charity alliances: When perceived celanthropy benefits nonprofit organisations. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 19(3), 200–208. https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.1497
54.
JonesO.GatrellC. (2014). The future of writing and reviewing for IJMR. International Journal of Management Reviews, 16(3), 249–264. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12038
55.
KaplanA.HaenleinM. (2019). Siri, Siri, in my hand: Who’s the fairest in the land? On the interpretations, illustrations, and implications of artificial intelligence. Business Horizons, 62(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.08.004
56.
KaplanA.HaenleinM. (2020). Rulers of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of artificial intelligence. Business Horizons, 63(1), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2019.09.003
KherwaP.BansalP. (2019). Topic modeling: A comprehensive review. EAI Endorsed Transactions on Scalable Information Systems, 7(24), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.13-7-2018.159623
59.
KleinK.SemrauT.AlbersS.ZajacE. J. (2020). Multimarket coopetition: How the interplay of competition and cooperation affects entry into shared markets. Long Range Planning, 53(1), 101868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2019.02.001
60.
KrausS.BreierM.Dasí-RodríguezS. (2020). The art of crafting a systematic literature review in entrepreneurship research. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 16(3), 1023–1042. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-020-00635-4
61.
KrausS.BreierM.LimW. M.DabićM.KumarS.KanbachD.MukherjeeD.CorvelloV.Piñeiro-ChousaJ.LiguoriE.Palacios-MarquésD.SchiavoneF.FerrarisA.FernandesC.FerreiraJ. J. (2022). Literature reviews as independent studies: Guidelines for academic practice. Review of Managerial Science, 16(8), 2577–2595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-022-00588-8
62.
KrausS.MahtoR. V.WalshS. T. (2023). The importance of literature reviews in small business and entrepreneurship research. Journal of Small Business Management, 61(3), 1095–1106. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2021.1955128
63.
KunischS.DenyerD.BartunekJ. M.MenzM.CardinalL. B. (2023). Review research as scientific inquiry. Organizational Research Methods, 26(1), 3–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/10944281221127292
64.
KunischS.MenzM.BartunekJ. M.CardinalL. B.DenyerD. (2018). Feature topic at organizational research methods: How to conduct rigorous and impactful literature reviews?Organizational Research Methods, 21(3), 519–523. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428118770750
65.
LancichinettiA.FortunatoS.KertészJ. (2009). Detecting the overlapping and hierarchical community structure in complex networks. New Journal of Physics, 11(3), 033015. https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/11/3/033015
66.
Le RoyF.CzakonW. (2016). Managing coopetition: The missing link between strategy and performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 53(1), 3–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.11.005
LindebaumD.FlemingP. (2024). ChatGPT undermines human reflexivity, scientific responsibility and responsible management research. British Journal of Management, 35(2), 566–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12781
69.
LuK.CaiX.AjiferukeI.WolframD. (2017). Vocabulary size and its effect on topic representation. Information Processing & Management, 53(3), 653–665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2017.01.003
70.
Lundgren-HenrikssonE. L.TidströmA. (2021). Temporal distancing and integrating: Exploring coopetition tensions through managerial sensemaking dynamics. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 37(3), 101168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2021.101168
MakadokR.BurtonR.BarneyJ. (2018). A practical guide for making theory contributions in strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 39(6), 1530–1545. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2789
73.
MarianiM. M. (2007). Coopetition as an emergent strategy: Empirical evidence from an Italian consortium of opera houses. International Studies of Management & Organization, 37(2), 97–126. https://doi.org/10.2753/IMO0020-8825370205
74.
MarshallI. J.WallaceB. C. (2019). Toward systematic review automation: A practical guide to using machine learning tools in research synthesis. Systematic Reviews, 8(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-018-0916-1
75.
MaulaM.StamW. (2020). Enhancing rigor in quantitative entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 44(6), 1059–1090. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258719891388
76.
M’ChirguiZ. (2005). The economics of the smart card industry: Towards coopetitive strategies. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 14(6), 455–477. https://doi.org/10.1080/1043859042000304070
77.
MillerR. G. (1981). Simultaneous statistical inference (Vol. 58). Springer.
78.
MimnoD.BleiD. (2011). Bayesian Checking for topic models. Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 227–237.
79.
MimnoD.WallachH.TalleyE.LeendersM.McCallumA. (2011, July). Optimizing semantic coherence in topic models. Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 262–272.
80.
MossbergL.GetzD. (2006). Stakeholder influences on the ownership and management of festival brands. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 6(4), 308–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/15022250601003273
PaisleyJ.WangC.BleiD. M.JordanM. I. (2014). Nested hierarchical Dirichlet processes. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 37(2), 256–270. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2014.2318728
83.
PallaG.DerényiI.FarkasI.VicsekT. (2005). Uncovering the overlapping community structure of complex networks in nature and society. Nature, 435(7043), 814–818. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03607
84.
PaucaV. P.ShahnazF.BerryM. W.PlemmonsR. J. (2004, April). Text mining using non-negative matrix factorizations. Proceedings of the 2004 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining, pp. 452–456. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
85.
PetticrewM.RobertsH. (2008). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. John Wiley & Sons.
86.
PinelloC.PiconeP. M.Mocciaro Li DestriA. (2022). Cobranding research: Where we are and where we could go from here. European Journal of Marketing, 56(2), 584–621. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-02-2021-0073
PorcielloJ.IvaninaM.IslamM.EinarsonS.HirshH. (2020). Accelerating evidence-informed decision-making for the sustainable development goals using machine learning. Nature Machine Intelligence, 2(10), 559–565. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-020-00235-5
89.
PostC.SaralaR.GatrellC.PrescottJ. E. (2020). Advancing theory with review articles. Journal of Management Studies, 57(2), 351–376. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12549
90.
PussegodaK.TurnerL.GarrittyC.MayhewA.SkidmoreB.StevensA.BoutronI.Sarkis-OnofreR.BjerreL. M.HróbjartssonA.AltmanD. G.MoherD. (2017). Systematic review adherence to methodological or reporting quality. Systematic Reviews, 6(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0385-3
91.
QiangJ.QianZ.LiY.YuanY.WuX. (2019). Short text topic modeling techniques, applications, and performance: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 34(3), 1427–1445. https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2020.2992485
92.
RabetinoR.KohtamäkiM.FedericoJ. S. (2021). A (re)view of the philosophical foundations of strategic management. International Journal of Management Reviews, 23(2), 151–190. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12244
93.
RaddatsC.KowalkowskiC.BenedettiniO.BurtonJ.GebauerH. (2019). Servitization: A contemporary thematic review of four major research streams. Industrial Marketing Management, 83, 207–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.03.015
94.
RitalaP. (2012). Coopetition strategy–when is it successful? Empirical evidence on innovation and market performance. British Journal of Management, 23(3), 307–324. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2011.00741.x
95.
RobledoS.Grisales AguirreA. M.HughesM.EggersF. (2021). “Hasta la vista, baby”–will machine learning terminate human literature reviews in entrepreneurship?Journal of Small Business Management, 61(3), 1314–1343. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2021.1955125
96.
RöderM.BothA.HinneburgA. (2015). Exploring the space of topic coherence measures. Proceedings of the Eighth ACM International Conference no Web Search and Data Mining.
97.
RosvallM.BergstromC. T. (2011). Multilevel compression of random walks on networks reveals hierarchical organization in large integrated systems. PLoS One, 6(4), e18209. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018209
98.
RousseauD. M.ManningJ.DenyerD. (2008). Evidence in management and organizational science: Assembling the field’s full weight of scientific knowledge through syntheses. Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 475–515. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520802211651
99.
SauerP. C.SeuringS. (2023). How to conduct systematic literature reviews in management research: A guide in 6 steps and 14 decisions. Review of Managerial Science, 17(5), 1899–1933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-023-00668-3
100.
SchmiedelT.MüllerO.Vom BrockeJ. (2019). Topic modeling as a strategy of inquiry in organizational research: A tutorial with an application example on organizational culture. Organizational Research Methods, 22(4), 941–968. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428118773858
101.
SeawrightJ.GerringJ. (2008). Case selection techniques in case study research: A menu of qualitative and quantitative options. Political Research Quarterly, 61(2), 294–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912907313077
102.
SharmaG.BansalP. (2023). Partnering up: Including managers as research partners in systematic reviews. Organizational Research Methods, 26(2), 262–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428120965706
103.
ShawJ. D.TangiralaS.VissaB.RodellJ. B. (2018). New ways of seeing: Theory integration across disciplines. Academy of Management Journal, 61(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2018.4001
104.
ShiT.KangK.ChooJ.ReddyC. K. (2018). Short-text topic modeling via non-negative matrix factorization enriched with local word-context correlations. Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference, pp. 1105–1114.
105.
SimonettiA.AlbanoA.PlaiaA.TumminelloM. (2023). Ranking coherence in topic models using statistically validated networks. Journal of Information Science. Online first. https://doi.org/10.1177/01655515221148369
106.
SimsekZ.BansalP.ShawJ. D.HeugensP.SmithW. K. (2018). From the editors—Seeing practice impact in new ways. Academy of Management Journal, 61(6), 2021–2025. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2018.4006
107.
SimsekZ.FoxB.HeaveyC. (2023). Systematicity in organizational research literature reviews: A framework and assessment. Organizational Research Methods, 26(2), 292–321. https://doi.org/10.1177/10944281211008652
TahamtanI.Safipour AfsharA.AhamdzadehK. (2016). Factors affecting number of citations: A comprehensive review of the literature. Scientometrics, 107, 1195–1225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1889-2
TranfieldD.DenyerD.SmartP. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375
112.
TumminelloM.ConsiglioA.VassalloP.CesariR.FarabulliniF. (2023). Insurance fraud detection: A statistically validated network approach. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 90(2), 381–419. https://doi.org/10.1111/jori.12415
113.
TumminelloM.MiccichèS.LilloF.PiiloJ.MantegnaR. N. (2011). Statistically validated networks in bipartite complex systems. PLoS One, 6(3), e17994. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0017994
114.
TumminelloM.MiccichèS.LilloF.VarhoJ.PiiloJ.MantegnaR. N. (2011). Community characterization of heterogeneous complex systems. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2011, P01019. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2011/01/P01019
115.
Van MaanenJ.SørensenJ. B.MitchellT. R. (2007). The interplay between theory and method. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1145–1154. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.26586080
116.
Von Friedrichs GrängsjöY. (2003). Destination networking: Co-opetition in peripheral surroundings. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 33(5), 427–448. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600030310481997
117.
WangC.PaisleyJ.BleiD. M. (2011). Online variational inference for the hierarchical Dirichlet process. Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, pp. 752–760. JMLR Workshop and Conference Proceedings.
118.
WangS. C.SoesiloP. K.ZhangD. (2015). Impact of luxury brand retailer co-branding strategy on potential customers: A cross-cultural study. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 27(3), 237–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/08961530.2014.970320
119.
WatanabeW. M.FelizardoK. R.CandidoA.Jrde SouzaÉ. F.de Campos NetoJ. E.VijaykumarN. L. (2020). Reducing efforts of software engineering systematic literature reviews updates using text classification. Information and Software Technology, 128, 106395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2020.106395
120.
WienerM.SaundersC. (2014). Forced coopetition in IT multi-sourcing. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 23(3), 210–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2014.08.001
121.
WilhelmM. (2018). Vertical coopetition in buyer–supplier relations. In The Routledge companion to coopetition strategies (pp. 381–389). Routledge.
122.
XieQ.GaoY.XiaN.ZhangS.TaoG. (2023). Coopetition and organizational performance outcomes: A meta-analysis of the main and moderator effects. Journal of Business Research, 154, 113363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113363
123.
YanX.GuoJ.LanY.ChengX. (2013). A biterm topic model for short texts. Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 1445–1456.
124.
YuanR.LuoJ.LiuM. J.YuJ. (2022). Understanding organizational resilience in a platform-based sharing business: The role of absorptive capacity. Journal of Business Research, 141, 85–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.11.012
125.
ZahraS. A.NeweyL. R. (2009). Maximizing the impact of organization science: Theory-building at the intersection of disciplines and/or fields. Journal of Management Studies, 46(6), 1059–1075. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00848.x
126.
ZhaoW.ChenJ. J.PerkinsR.LiuZ.GeW.DingY.ZouW. (2015). A heuristic approach to determine an appropriate number of topics in topic modeling. BMC Bioinformatics, 16(13), Article S8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-16-S13-S8
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
