While there has been a great deal of guidance on qualitative research methodology, such scholarship has focused almost exclusively on the first three parts of the qualitative process: study design, data gathering, and coding/analysis. We suggest that writing findings is a fourth stage that involves pre-writing and composing. Our intent is to provide practices for this phase for those who are using qualitative data as the evidentiary basis for their claims. The pre-writing phase is strengthened by structuring claims and storyboarding findings, while the composing phase is improved by critically evaluating how to insert the author's voice. Practices surrounding qualitative writing are discussed, such as which quotes to include, where to place quotes, and how to edit quotes. Annotated examples are also provided that show both recommended and nonrecommended ways of inserting the author's voice into a findings section. A sample structure for writing a claim—a claim table—and a sample storyboard are provided.
BateS. P. (1997). Whatever happened to organizational anthropology? A review of the field of organizational ethnography and anthropological studies. Human Relations, 50(9), 1147–1175. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016961918626
2.
BeckmanC. M.StankoT. L. (2020). It takes three: Relational boundary work, resilience, and commitment among navy couples. Academy of Management Journal, 63(2), 411–439. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2017.0653
BowenG. A. (2008). Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: A research note. Qualitative Research, 8(1), 137–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794107085301
5.
BowenG. A. (2009). Supporting a grounded theory with an audit trail: An illustration. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 12(4), 305–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570802156196
6.
BresmanH. (2013). Changing routines: A process model of vicarious group learning in pharmaceutical R&D. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 35–61. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0725
7.
CarcaryM. (2009). The research audit trail—enhancing trustworthiness in qualitative inquiry. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 7(1), 11–24.
8.
CarcaryM. (2020). The research audit trail: Methodological guidance for application in practice. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 18(2), 166–177. https://doi.org/10.34190/JBRM.18.2.008
9.
CartonA. M. (2018). I’m not mopping the floors, I’m putting a man on the moon”: How NASA leaders enhanced the meaningfulness of work by changing the meaning of work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 63(2), 323–369. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839217713748
10.
CharmazK. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage.
CorleyK. G.GioiaD. A. (2011). Building theory about theory building: What constitutes a theoretical contribution?Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 12–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0486
13.
CreswellJ. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches. Sage.
14.
DekenF.BerendsH.GemserG.LaucheK. (2018). Strategizing and the initiation of interorganizational collaboration through prospective resourcing. Academy of Management Journal, 61(5), 1920–1950. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.0687
15.
DenzinN. K. (1978). Sociological methods: A sourcebook. McGraw-Hill.
16.
EisenhardtK. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. https://doi.org/10.2307/258557
17.
EisenhardtK. M.GraebnerM. E.SonensheinS. (2016). Grand challenges and inductive methods: Rigor without rigor mortis. Academy of Management Journal, 59(4), 1113–1123. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.4004
18.
EmersonR. M.FretzR. I.ShawL. L. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. The University of Chicago Press.
19.
FarajA. K. A. (2015). Scaffolding EFL students’ writing through the writing process approach. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(13), 131–141.
20.
FawcettS. E.WallerM. A.MillerJ. W.SchwietermanM. A.HazenB. T.OverstreetR. E. (2014). A trail guide to publishing success: Tips on writing influential conceptual, qualitative, and survey research. Journal of Business Logistics, 35(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbl.12039
21.
FlickU. (2004). Triangulation in qualitative research. In von KardoffE. SteinkeI.Flick U. (Eds.), A companion to qualitative research (Vol. 3, pp. 178–183).
22.
FlickU. (Ed.). (2013). The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis. Sage.
23.
GephartR. P. (2004). From the editors: Qualitative research and the Academy of Management Journal. Academy of Management Journal, 47(4), 454–462. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2004.14438580
24.
GioiaD. A.CorleyK. G.HamiltonA. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151
25.
GlaserB.StraussA. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Sociology Press.
26.
Golden-BiddleK.LockeK. (2007). Composing qualitative research (2nd ed.). Sage.
HarleyB.CornelissenJ. (2022). Rigor with or without templates? The pursuit of methodological rigor in qualitative research. Organizational Research Methods, 25(2), 239–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428120937786
29.
HarrisonS. H.RouseE. D. (2014). Let's dance! Elastic coordination in creative group work: A qualitative study of modern dancers. Academy of Management Journal, 57(5), 1256–1283. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.0343
HatchM. J. (1996). The role of the researcher: An analysis of narrative position in organization theory. Journal of Management Inquiry, 5(4), 359–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/105649269654011
32.
HolsteinJ. A.GubriumJ. F. (2012). Varieties of narrative analysis.Sage.
33.
Howard-GrenvilleJ.NelsonA.VoughH.ZilberT. B. (2021). From the editors—achieving fit and avoiding misfit in qualitative research. Academy of Management Journal, 64(5), 1313–1323. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2021.4005
34.
HumphriesM.WatsonT. (2009). Ethnographic practices: From ‘writing-up ethnographic research’ to ‘writing ethnography’. In YbemaS.YanowD.WelsH.KamsteegF. (Eds.), Organizational ethnography: Studying the complexity of everyday life. Sage.
35.
JarzabkowskiP.BednarekR.LêJ. K. (2014). Producing persuasive findings: Demystifying ethnographic textwork in strategy and organization research. Strategic Organization, 12(4), 274–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127014554575
36.
JarzabkowskiP.LangleyA.NigamA. (2021). Navigating the tensions of quality in qualitative research. Strategic Organization, 19(1), 70–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127020985094
37.
JickT. D. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(4), 602–611. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392366
38.
JonsenK.FendtJ.PointS. (2018). Convincing qualitative research: What constitutes persuasive writing?Organizational Research Methods, 21(1), 30–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428117706533
KöhlerT. (2016). From the editors: On writing up qualitative research in management learning and education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 15(3), 400–418. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2016.0275
41.
LangleyA. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 691–710. https://doi.org/10.2307/259349
42.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
43.
LockeK.FeldmanM.Golden-BiddleK. (2022). Coding practices and iterativity: Beyond templates for analyzing qualitative data. Organizational Research Methods, 25(2), 262–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428120948600
44.
Mees-BussJ.WelchC.PiekkariR. (2022). From templates to heuristics: How and why to move beyond the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 25(2), 405–429. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428120967716
45.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage.
46.
O’KaneP.SmithA.LermanM. P. (2021). Building transparency and trustworthiness in inductive research through computer-aided qualitative data analysis software. Organizational Research Methods, 24(1), 104–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428119865016
47.
PolkinghorneD. E. (1995). Narrative configuration in qualitative analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 8(1), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951839950080103
48.
PollockT. G. (2021). How to use storytelling in your academic writing: Techniques for engaging readers and successfully navigating the writing and publishing processes.Edward Elgar Publishing.
49.
PollockT. G.BonoJ. E. (2013). Being Scheherazade: The importance of storytelling in academic writing. Academy of Management Journal, 56(3), 629–634. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.4003
50.
PrattM.G. (2023). General coding and analysis in qualitative research. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190236557.013.859
51.
PrattM. G. (2008). Fitting oval pegs into round holes: Tensions in evaluating and publishing qualitative research in top-tier North American journals. Organizational Research Methods, 11(3), 481–509. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428107303349
52.
PrattM. G.KaplanS.WhittingtonR. (2020). Editorial essay: The tumult over transparency: Decoupling transparency from replication in establishing trustworthy qualitative research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 65(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839219887663
53.
PrattM. G.RockmannK. W.KaufmannJ. B. (2006). Constructing professional identity: The role of work and identity learning cycles in the customization of identity among medical residents. Academy of Management Journal, 49(2), 235–262. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.20786060
54.
PrattM. G.SalaG. R. (2021). A researcher’s toolkit for observational methods. In Oxford research encyclopedia of business and management. Oxford University Press.
55.
PrattM. G.SonensheinS.FeldmanM. S. (2022). Moving beyond templates: A bricolage approach to conducting trustworthy qualitative research. Organizational Research Methods, 25(2), 211–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428120927466
ReayT.ZafarA.MonteiroP.GlaserV. (2019). Presenting findings from qualitative research: One size does not fit all! In ZilberT. B.AmisJ. M.MairJ. (Eds.), The production of managerial knowledge and organizational theory: New approaches to writing, producing and consuming theory (Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 59, pp. 201–216). Emerald Publishing Limited.
59.
RouseE. D.HarrisonS. H. (2016). Triangulate and expand: Using multiple sources of data for convergence and expansion to enrich inductive theorizing. In ElsbachK. D.KramerR. M. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative organizational research: Innovative pathways and methods (pp. 286–297). Routledge.
60.
SandelowskiM. (1994). Focus on qualitative methods. The use of quotes in qualitative research. Research In Nursing & Health, 17(6), 479–482. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.4770170611
SchabramK.MaitlisS. (2017). Negotiating the challenges of a calling: Emotion and enacted sensemaking in animal shelter work. Academy of Management Journal, 60(2), 584–609. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.0665
63.
Schwartz-SheaP.YanowD. (2009). Reading and writing as method: In search of trustworthy texts. In YbemaS.YanowD.WelsH.KamsteegF. (Eds.), Organizational ethnography: Studying the complexity of Everyday life. Sage.
64.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Sage.
65.
TraceyP.DalpiazE.PhillipsN. (2018). Fish out of water: Translation, legitimation, and new venture creation. Academy of Management Journal, 61(5), 1627–1666. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.0264
