In a three-path mediational model, two mediators intervene in a series between an independent and a dependent variable. Methods of testing for mediation in such a model are generalized from the more often used single-mediator model. Six such methods are introduced and compared in a Monte Carlo study in terms of their Type I error, power, and coverage. Based on its results, the joint significance test is preferred when only a hypothesis test is of interest. The percentile bootstrap and bias-corrected bootstrap are preferred when a confidence interval on the mediated effect is desired, with the latter having more power but also slightly inflated Type I error in some conditions.
Aiken, L.S., Gerend, M.A., & Jackson, K.M. (2001). Subjective risk and health protective behavior: Cancer screening and cancer prevention. In A. Baum, T. Revenson, & J. Singer (Eds). Handbook of Health Psychology (pp. 727-746). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
2.
Aiken, L.S., & West, S.G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
4.
Allen, D.G., & Griffeth, R.W. (2001). Test of a mediated performance-turnover relationship highlighting the moderating roles of visibility and reward contingency . Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 1014-1021.
5.
Alwin, D.F., & Hauser, R.M. (1975). The decomposition of effects in path analysis . American Sociological Review, 40, 37-47.
6.
Baron, R.M., & Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
Bollen, K.A., & Stine, R. (1990). Direct and indirect effects: Classical and bootstrap estimates of variability. In C. C. Clogg (Ed.), Sociological methodology, 1990 (pp. 115-140). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
9.
Claessens, B.J.C., Van Eerde, W., Rutte, C.G., & Roe, R.A. (2004). Planning behavior and perceived control of time at work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 937-950.
10.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11.
Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S.G., & Aiken, L.S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12.
Cook, T.D., & Campbell, D.T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago : Rand McNally.
13.
Craig, C.C. (1936). On the frequency function of xy. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 7, 1-15.
14.
Duncan, O.D., Featherman, D.L., & Duncan, B. (1972). Socioeconomic background and achievement. New York: Seminar Press.
15.
Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R.J. (1993). An introduction to the bootstrap. New York: Chapman & Hall.
16.
Goodman, L.A. (1960). On the exact variance of products. Journal of the American Statistical Association,55, 708-713.
17.
Hagle, T.M., & Mitchell, G.E. (1992). Goodness-of-fit measures for probit and logit. American Journal of Political Science , 36, 762-784.
18.
Holland, P.W. (1988). Causal inference, path analysis, and recursive structural equation models. In C. C. Clogg (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 449-484). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
19.
Hosmer, D.W., & Lemeshow, S. (2000). Applied logistic regression (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley.
20.
James, L.R., & Brett, J.M. (1984). Mediators, moderators, and tests for mediation . Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 307-321.
21.
James, L.R., Mulaik, S.A., & Brett, J.M. (1982). Causal analysis: Assumptions, models, and data . Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
22.
James, L.R., Mulaik, S.A., & Brett, J.M. (2006). A tale of two methods. Organizational Research Methods, 9, 233-244.
23.
Joöreskog, K.G., & Soörbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8: User's reference guide. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International .
24.
Judd, C.M., & Kenny, D.A. (1981). Process analysis: Estimating mediation in treatment evaluations. Evaluation Review, 5, 602-619.
25.
Kaplan, D. (1988). The impact of specification error on the estimation, testing, and improvement of structural equation models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 23, 69-86.
26.
Kenny, D.A., Kashy, D.A., & Bolger, N. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. In D. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske , & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 233-265). New York: McGraw-Hill.
27.
Kiefer, T. (2005). Feeling bad: Antecedents and consequences of negative emotions in ongoing change. Journal of Organizational Behavior , 26, 875-897.
MacKinnon, D.P., Fritz, M.S., Williams, J., & Lockwood, C.M. (in press). Distribution of the product confidence limits for the indirect effect: Program PRODCLIN. Behavioral Research Methods.
30.
MacKinnon, D.P., Krull, J.L., & Lockwood, C.M. (2000). Equivalence of the mediation, confounding, and suppression effect. Prevention Science, 1, 173-181.
31.
MacKinnon, D.P., Lockwood, C.M., Hoffman, J.M., West, S.G., & Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods , 7, 83-104.
32.
MacKinnon, D.P., Lockwood, C.M., & Williams, J. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 99-128.
33.
Manly, B.F. (1997). Randomization, bootstrap, and Monte Carlo methods in biology (2nd ed.). New York : Chapman and Hall.
34.
McGuire, W.J. (1980). The communication-persuasion model and health-risk labeling. In L. A. Morris, M. B. Mazis, & I. Barofsky (Eds.), Product labeling and health risks (Banbury Report No. 6, pp. 99-122). New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory.
35.
Menard, S. (2000). Coefficients of determination for multiple logistic regression analysis. The American Statistician, 54, 17-24.
36.
Muthén, L.K., & Muthén, B. (2006). Mplus user's guide (Version 4). Los Angeles: Author.
37.
Rubin, D.B. (1974). Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. Journal of Educational Psychology , 66, 688-701.
38.
Sas Institute. (2005). SAS [Computer software]. Cary, NC: Author.
39.
Shrout, P.E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422-445.
40.
Sobel, M.E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In S. Leinhardt (Ed.), Sociological methodology, 1982 (pp. 290-312). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association .
41.
Springer, M.D., & Thompson, W.E. (1970). The distribution of products of beta, gamma, and Gaussian random variables. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 18, 721-737.
42.
SPSS Inc. (2006). AMOS 7.0 [Computer software]. Chicago: Author .
43.
Stewart, G.L., & Barrick, M.R. (2000). Team structure and performance: Assessing the mediating role of intrateam process and the moderating role of task type. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 135-148.
44.
Tein, J.-Y., Sandler, I.N., & Zautra, A.J. (2000). Stressful life events, psychological distress, coping, and parenting of divorced mothers: A longitudinal study. Journal of Family Psychology, 14, 27-41.
45.
Tekleab, A.G., Bartol, K.M., & Liu, W. (2005). Is it pay levels or pay raises that matter to fairness and turnover? Journal of Organizational Behavior , 26, 899-921.
