Confidence intervals are in many ways a more satisfactory basis for statistical inference than hypothesis tests. This article explains a simple method for using bootstrap resampling to derive confidence intervals. This method can be used for a wide variety of statistics—including the mean and median, the difference of two means or proportions, and correlation and regression coefficients. It can be implemented by an Excel spreadsheet, which is available to readers on the Web. The rationale behind the method is transparent, and it relies on almost no sophisticated statistical concepts.
Davison, A. C., & Hinkley, D. V. (1997). Bootstrap methods and their application. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2.
Diaconis, P., & Efron, B. (1983, May). Computer intensive methods in statistics. Scientific American, 248, 96-108.
3.
Efron, B. (1979). Bootstrap methods: Another look at the jackknife. Annals of Statistics, 7(1), 1-26.
4.
Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1993). An introduction to the bootstrap. New York: Chapman & Hall.
5.
Gardner, M., & Altman, D. G. (1986, March 15). Confidence intervals rather than P values: Estimation rather than hypothesis testing. British Medical Journal, 292, 746-750.
6.
Hall, P. (1992). The bootstrap and Edgeworth expansion. New York: Springer-Verlag.
7.
Kirk, R. E. (1996). Practical significance: A concept whose time has come. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56(5), 746-759.
8.
Lindsay, R. M. (1995). Reconsidering the status of tests of significance: An alternative criterion of adequacy. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20(1), 35-53.
9.
Lunneborg, C. E. (2000). Data analysis by resampling: Concepts and applications. Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury.
10.
McGoldrick, P. M., & Greenland, S. J. (1992). Competition between banks and building societies. British Journal of Management, 3, 169-172.
11.
Mooney, C. Z., & Duval, R. D. (1993). Bootstrapping: A nonparametric approach to statistical inference. London: Sage.
12.
Morrison, D. E., & Henkel, R. E. (1970). The significance test controversy. London: Butterworths.
13.
Noreen, E. W. (1989). Computer intensive methods for testing hypotheses. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
14.
Royall, R. (1997). Statistical evidence: A likelihood paradigm. London: Chapman & Hall.
15.
Russell, C. J., & Dean, M. A. (2000). To log or not to log: Bootstrap as an alternative to the parametric estimation of moderation effects in the presence of skewed dependent variables. Organizational Research Methods, 3(2), 166-185.
16.
Morrison, D. E., & Henkel, R. E. (1970). The significance test controversy. London: Butterworth’s.
17.
Smithson, M. (2000). Statistics with confidence. London: Sage.
18.
Wood, M. (2003). Making sense of statistics: A non-mathematical approach. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.
