The Impact of Project Impact on the Wilmington,North Carolina,Labor Market

Abstract

In 1997, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) announced a new initiative called Project Impact. The initiative was designed to make communities more resistant and resilient to the disruption and disaster associated with natural hazards. One of the pilot communities was Wilmington/New Hanover County, North Carolina, an area susceptible to hurricanes and tropical storms. This article examines the impact of Project Impact on this community’s labor market, allowing for the disturbances caused by the storms themselves. The findings suggest that the activities and coordination efforts associated with Project Impact coincide with improvements in the Wilmington labor market characterized by a lower natural unemployment rate and a reduction of labor market risk. These findings may be taken as evidence that Project Impact can improve the performance of a local economy. The results suggest that at the very least, increased interaction between public and private sectors may be associated with improved labor market conditions.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bollerslev, T. , and J. Wooldridge . 1992. Quasi-maximum likelihood estimation and inference in dynamic models with time-varying covariances. Econometric Reviews 11:143-172.

Dickey, D. A. , and W. A. Fuller . 1981. Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometrica 49:1057-1071.

Enders, W. 1995. Applied econometric time series. New York: John Wiley.

Engle, R. 1982. Autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity with estimates of the variance of the U.K. inflation. Econometrica 50:987-1008.

Ewing, B. T. , and W. L. Seyfried . 2000. Some additional thoughts about the Phillips Curve. Social Science Quarterly 81 (2): 680-682.

Guimaraes, P. , F. L. Hefner , and D. P. Woodward . 1993. Wealth and income effects of natural disasters: An econometric analysis of Hurricane Hugo. Review of Regional Studies 23 (2): 97-114.

Harvey, A. C. 1994. Time series models. 2d ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Montgomery, A. L. , V. Zarnowitz , R. S. Tsay , and G. C. Tiao . 1998. Forecasting the U.S. unemployment rate. Journal of the American Statistical Association 93 (442, Applications and Case Studies): 478-493.

Payne, J. E. , B. T. Ewing , and E. George . 1999. Time series dynamics of U.S. state unemploy ment rates. Applied Economics 31:1503-1510.

10.

Phillips, P.C.B. , and P. Perron . 1988. Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika 75:335-346.

11.

Romer, D. 1996. Advanced macroeconomics. New York: McGraw-Hill.

12.

Rothman, P. 1998. Forecasting asymmetric unemployment rates. Review of Economics and Statistics 80:164-168.

13.

Stiglitz, J. 1997. Reflections on the natural rate hypothesis. Journal of Economic Perspectives 11:3-10.

14.

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics . Various dates. Employment and earnings. Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.

15.

West, C. T. , and D. G. Lenze . 1994. Modeling the regional impact of natural disaster and recovery: A general framework and an application to Hurricane Andrew. International Regional Science Review 17:121-150.