Central nervous system (CNS) anomalies are the second most frequent category of congenital anomalies after congenital heart defects (CHDs). In this study, the aim was to investigate the distribution of different CNS anomalies with associated anomalies and karyotype in a fetal autopsy population of terminated pregnancies over a 30-year period and to correlate the ultrasonographic diagnoses of CNS anomalies with autopsy findings.
Materials and Methods
This study includes 420 intact fetuses with CNS anomalies terminated at gestational ages 11+ 0 to 33+ 6 over a 30-year period from 1985 to 2014. An ultrasound (US) examination was performed at the National Centre for Fetal Medicine, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim. The autopsies were performed at the Department of Pathology at the same hospital or a collaborating hospital. The anomalies were subcategorized according to the classification by the World Health Organization.
Results
Neural tube defects such as anencephaly (22.4%, 107/477) and spina bifida (22.2%, 106/477) constituted the most common CNS anomalies, followed by congenital hydrocephalus (17.8%, 85/477). In total, the karyotype was abnormal in 21.0% of all termination of pregnancies (TOPs), with trisomy 18 as the most frequent abnormal karyotype. CHDs, skeletal anomalies, and urinary anomalies were the most common associated organ anomalies. Throughout the study period, there was full agreement between US and postmortem findings of CNS anomalies in 96.9% (407/420) of TOPs.
Conclusion
In this study of autopsy findings of CNS anomalies in intact fetuses terminated after prenatal US diagnosis, neural tube defects were most common. About half of the fetuses had isolated serious CNS anomalies, while the other half were CNS anomalies associated with structural and/or chromosomal anomalies. The prenatal US diagnoses were in good concordance with autopsy findings. In particular, due to challenges of diagnoses made early in pregnancy, it is necessary to continue the validation practice.
RossiACPrefumoF. Correlation between fetal autopsy and prenatal diagnosis by ultrasound: a systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol2016; 210: 201–206.
3.
PinarHTatevosyantsNSingerDB. Central nervous system malformations in a perinatal/neonatal autopsy series. Pediatr Dev Pathol1998; 1: 42–48.
4.
IsaksenCVEik-NesSHBlaasHGTorpSH. Comparison of prenatal ultrasound and postmortem findings in fetuses and infants with central nervous system anomalies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol1998; 11: 246–253.
5.
Pajkrt E, Chitty LS. The routine fetal anomaly scan. In: Twining P, McHugo JM, Pilling DW, eds. Textbook of fetal abnormalities. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier; 2007:17–40.
6.
RouleauCGasnerABigiN, et al.Prevalence and timing of pregnancy termination for brain malformations. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed2011; 96: F360–F364.
7.
Encha-RazaviF. Identification of brain malformations: neuropathological approach. Childs Nerv Syst2003; 19: 448–454.
8.
ThayyilSClearyJOSebireNJ, et al.Post-mortem examination of human fetuses: a comparison of whole-body high-field MRI at 9.4 T with conventional MRI and invasive autopsy. Lancet2009; 374: 467–475.
9.
Cristina RossiAPrefumoF. The additional value of fetal magnetic resonance imaging in the prenatal diagnosis of central nervous system anomalies: a systematic review of the literature. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol2014; 44: 388–393.
10.
ArthursOJThayyilSPauliahSS, et al.Diagnostic accuracy and limitations of post-mortem MRI for neurological abnormalities in fetuses and children. Clin Radiol2015; 70: 872–880.
11.
PaladiniDQuarantelliMSglavoG, et al.Accuracy of neurosonography and MRI in clinical management of fetuses referred with central nervous system abnormalities. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol2014; 44: 188–196.
12.
IrwinKHenryAGopikrishnaSTaylorJWelshAW. Utility of fetal MRI for workup of fetal central nervous system anomalies in an Australian maternal-fetal medicine cohort. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol2016; 56: 267–273.
13.
GoncalvesLFLeeWModySShettyASangi-HaghpeykarHRomeroR. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of fetal anomalies: a blinded case-control study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol2016; 48: 185–192.
14.
KulSKorkmazHACansuA, et al.Contribution of MRI to ultrasound in the diagnosis of fetal anomalies. J Magn Reson Imaging2012; 35: 882–890.
15.
AminiHAxelssonORaiendMWikstromJ. The clinical impact of fetal magnetic resonance imaging on management of CNS anomalies in the second trimester of pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand2010; 89: 1571–1581.
16.
Van MieghemTHindryckxAVan CalsterenK. Early fetal anatomy screening: who, what, when and why?. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol2015; 27: 143–150.
17.
RossiACPrefumoF. Accuracy of ultrasonography at 11-14 weeks of gestation for detection of fetal structural anomalies: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol2013; 122: 1160–1167.
18.
SoukaAPPilalisAKavalakisYKosmasYAntsaklisPAntsaklisA. Assessment of fetal anatomy at the 11-14-week ultrasound examination. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol2004; 24: 730–734.
19.
BlaasHG. Detection of structural abnormalities in the first trimester using ultrasound. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol2014; 28: 341–353.
20.
SoukaAPPilalisAKavalakisI, et al.Screening for major structural abnormalities at the 11- to 14-week ultrasound scan. Am J Obstet Gynecol2006; 194: 393–396.
21.
SalomonLJAlfirevicZBilardoCM, et al.ISUOG practice guidelines: performance of first-trimester fetal ultrasound scan. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol2013; 41: 102–113.
22.
IliescuDTudoracheSComanescuA, et al.Improved detection rate of structural abnormalities in the first trimester using an extended examination protocol. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol2013; 42: 300–309.
23.
BlaasHGEik-NesSH. Sonoembryology and early prenatal diagnosis of neural anomalies. Prenat Diagn2009; 29: 312–325.
24.
WhitlowBJChatzipapasIKLazanakisMLKadirRAEconomidesDL. The value of sonography in early pregnancy for the detection of fetal abnormalities in an unselected population. Br J Obstet Gynaecol1999; 106: 929–936.
25.
SalvadorJArigitaMCarrerasELladonosaABorrellA. Evolution of prenatal detection of neural tube defects in the pregnant population of the city of Barcelona from 1992 to 2006. Prenat Diagn2011; 31: 1184–1188.
26.
BlaasHGEik-NesSHBergSTorpH. In-vivo three-dimensional ultrasound reconstructions of embryos and early fetuses. Lancet1998; 352: 1182–1186.
27.
EngelsACJoyeuxLBrantnerC, et al.Sonographic detection of central nervous system defects in the first trimester of pregnancy. Prenat Diagn2016; 36: 266–273.
28.
MelcerYMaymonRKrajden HaratzK, et al.Termination of pregnancy due to fetal central nervous system abnormalities performed after 24 weeks' gestation: survey of 57 fetuses from a single medical center. Arch Gynecol Obstet2018; 298: 551–559.
29.
DomroseCMBremerSBuczekC, et al.Termination of pregnancy following prenatally diagnosed central nervous system malformations. Arch Gynecol Obstet2018; 298: 903–910.
30.
WaldMLawrenzKDeutingerJWeningerM. Verification of anomalies of the central nervous system detected by prenatal ultrasound. Ultraschall in der Medizin2004; 25: 214–217.
31.
CarrollSGPorterHAbdel-FattahSKylePMSoothillPW. Correlation of prenatal ultrasound diagnosis and pathologic findings in fetal brain abnormalities. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol2000; 16: 149–153.
32.
StruksnaesCBlaasHGEik-NesSHVogtC. Correlation between prenatal ultrasound and postmortem findings in 1029 fetuses following termination of pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol2016; 48: 232–238.
International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology Education Committee. Sonographic examination of the fetal central nervous system: guidelines for performing the ‘basic examination’ and the ‘fetal neurosonogram’. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol2007; 29: 109–116.
35.
WHO. International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th revision (ICD-10). Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2016.
36.
WHO. International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 11th revision (ICD-11). Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2018.
37.
JohnsonSPSebireNJSnijdersRJTunkelSNicolaidesKH. Ultrasound screening for anencephaly at 10-14 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol1997; 9: 14–16.
38.
Fleurke-RozemaJHvan LeijdenLvan de KampKPajkrtEBilardoCMSnijdersRJ. Timing of detection of anencephaly in The Netherlands. Prenat Diagn2015; 35: 483–485.
StevensonRESeaverLHCollinsJSDeanJH. Neural tube defects and associated anomalies in South Carolina. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol2004; 70: 554–558.
41.
GoetzingerKRStamilioDMDickeJMMaconesGAOdiboAO. Evaluating the incidence and likelihood ratios for chromosomal abnormalities in fetuses with common central nervous system malformations. Am J Obstet Gynecol2008; 199: 285.e1–285.e6.
42.
SepulvedaWCorralEAyalaCBeCGutierrezJVasquezP. Chromosomal abnormalities in fetuses with open neural tube defects: prenatal identification with ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol2004; 23: 352–356.
43.
WoodLRSmithMT. Generation of anencephaly: 1. Aberrant neurulation and 2. Conversion of exencephaly to anencephaly. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol1984; 43: 620–633.
44.
LuehrBLipsettJQuinlivanJA. Limb-body wall complex: a case series. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med2002; 12: 132–137.
45.
AlghamdiMAZiermannJMGreggLDiogoR. A detailed musculoskeletal study of a fetus with anencephaly and spina bifida (craniorachischisis), and comparison with other cases of human congenital malformations. J Anat2017; 230: 842–858.
46.
JohnsonKMSuarezLFelknerMMHendricksK. Prevalence of craniorachischisis in a Texas-Mexico border population. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol2004; 70: 92–94.
47.
BarisicIBobanLLoaneM, et al.Meckel-Gruber Syndrome: a population-based study on prevalence, prenatal diagnosis, clinical features, and survival in Europe. Eur J Hum Genet2015; 23: 746–752.
48.
JengSGuptaNWrenschMZhaoSWuYW. Prevalence of congenital hydrocephalus in California, 1991-2000. Pediatr Neurol2011; 45: 67–71.
49.
GarneELoaneMAddorMCBoydPABarisicIDolkH. Congenital hydrocephalus—prevalence, prenatal diagnosis and outcome of pregnancy in four European regions. Eur J Paediatr Neurol2010; 14: 150–155.
50.
Schrander-StumpelCFrynsJP. Congenital hydrocephalus: nosology and guidelines for clinical approach and genetic counselling. Eur J Pediatr1998; 157: 355–362.
51.
KolbleNWisserJKurmanaviciusJ, et al.Dandy-Walker malformation: prenatal diagnosis and outcome. Prenat Diagn2000; 20: 318–327.
52.
PhillipsJJMahonyBSSiebertJRLalaniTFlignerCLKapurRP. Dandy-Walker malformation complex: correlation between ultrasonographic diagnosis and postmortem neuropathology. Obstet Gynecol2006; 107: 685–693.
53.
Pilu G, Nicolaides KH, Meizner I, Romero R, Sepulveda W. Prenatal diagnosis of fetal anomalies. In: Wladimiroff JW, Eik-Nes SH, eds. European Practice in Gynaecology and Obstetrics—Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 1st ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2009:157–208.
54.
BlaasHGErikssonAGSalvesenKA, et al.Brains and faces in holoprosencephaly: pre- and postnatal description of 30 cases. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol2002; 19: 24–38.
TennstedtCHufnaglPChaouiRKornerHDietelM. Fetal autopsy: a review of recent developments. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol2001; 99: 66–71.
57.
Martinez-TenPIllescasTAdiegoB, et al.Non-visualization of choroid plexus of fourth ventricle as first-trimester predictor of posterior fossa anomalies and chromosomal defects. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol2018; 51: 199–207.
58.
WhitbyEHVariendSRutterS, et al.Corroboration of in utero MRI using post-mortem MRI and autopsy in foetuses with CNS abnormalities. Clin Radiol2004; 59: 1114–1120.
59.
GriffithsPDPaleyMNWhitbyEH. Post-mortem MRI as an adjunct to fetal or neonatal autopsy. Lancet2005; 365: 1271–1273.
60.
Shen-SchwarzSNeishCHillLM. Antenatal ultrasound for fetal anomalies: importance of perinatal autopsy. Pediatr Pathol1989; 9: 1–9.
61.
ChescheirNCReitnauerPJ. A comparative study of prenatal diagnosis and perinatal autopsy. J Ultrasound Med1994; 13: 451–456.
62.
VogtCBlaasHGSalvesenKAEik-NesSH. Comparison between prenatal ultrasound and postmortem findings in fetuses and infants with developmental anomalies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol2012; 39: 666–672.
63.
BoydPATondiFHicksNRChamberlainPF. Autopsy after termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly: retrospective cohort study. BMJ2004; 328: 137.
64.
CohenMCPaleyMNGriffithsPDWhitbyEH. Less invasive autopsy: benefits and limitations of the use of magnetic resonance imaging in the perinatal postmortem. Pediatr Dev Pathol2008; 11: 1–9.
