Red cell distribution width (RDW) has recently emerged as a potential biomarker reflecting nutritional and inflammatory status in surgical oncology. While anastomotic leakage (AL) remains a devastating complication after right hemicolectomy for colorectal cancer, the predictive role of RDW in this setting has not been clearly established. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of RDW in predicting AL and postoperative outcomes after right hemicolectomy.
Methods:
This retrospective study included 234 patients who underwent right or extended right hemicolectomy for colorectal cancer between June 2020 and May 2025 at a tertiary referral center. Demographic, surgical, histopathological, and laboratory data were analyzed. Postoperative complications were graded according to the Clavien–Dindo classification.
Results:
AL occurred in 3.4% of patients; however, RDW was not an independent predictor. Patients with elevated RDW-fL values (>46.1 fL) were significantly older and had higher American Society of Anesthesiologists’ (ASA) scores, lower preoperative hemoglobin and albumin levels, and higher C-reactive protein levels. They also demonstrated shorter overall survival (47.7 versus 59.2 months, P = .027). High RDW-fL was independently associated with major postoperative complications and failure to complete adjuvant therapy.
Conclusion:
Preoperative RDW did not predict AL but was strongly associated with postoperative complications, adverse survival, and incomplete adjuvant treatment. RDW may serve as a simple, cost-effective biomarker for perioperative risk stratification in colorectal cancer surgery.
Asghari-JafarabadiM, WilkinsS, PlazzerJP, et al.Prognostic factors and survival disparities in right-sided versus left-sided colon cancer. Sci Rep, 2024; 14(1):12306.
4.
GaoJ, GuX, PangM, et al.Risk factors for anastomotic leak and postoperative morbidity after right hemicolectomy for colon cancer: Results from a prospective, multi-centre, snapshot study in China. Br J Surg, 2024; 111(1):znad316.
5.
2015 European Society of Coloproctology Collaborating Group. Predictors for anastomotic leak, postoperative complications, and mortality after right colectomy for cancer: Results from an international snapshot audit. Dis Colon Rectum, 2020; 63(5):606–618.
6.
WoonC, PrabhakaranS, ChakrabortyJ, et al.Rate of anastomotic leak following right hemicolectomy by general surgical trainees. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2020; 35(12):2339–2346.
7.
FrassonM, Granero-CastroP, RodríguezJLR, et al.; ANACO Study Group. Risk factors for anastomotic leak and postoperative morbidity and mortality after elective right colectomy for cancer: Results from a prospective, multicentric study of 1102 patients. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2016; 31(1):105–114.
8.
WeiH, WangJ, JiangZ, et al.Preoperative prognostic nutritional index associated with anastomotic leakage in colorectal cancer patients after surgery. Adv Clin Exp Med, 2024; 33(4):351–359.
9.
XiangS, YangYK, WangTY, et al.Development and validation of a nomogram to predict anastomotic leakage in colorectal cancer based on CT body composition. Front Nutr, 2022; 9:974903.
10.
WenZL, ZhouX, XiaoDC. Is red blood cell distribution width a prognostic factor for colorectal cancer? A meta-analysis. Front Surg, 2022; 9:945126.
11.
ChengKC, LinYM, LiuCC, et al.High red cell distribution width is associated with worse prognosis in early colorectal cancer after curative resection: A propensity-matched analysis. Cancers (Basel), 2022; 14(4):945.
12.
ZhaoW, ShenX, HuaQ, et al.Red cell distribution width-a potential prognostic indicator for colorectal cancer patients after radical resection in China. J Gastrointest Oncol, 2023; 14(4):1746–1758.
13.
YangD, QuanW, WuJ, et al.The value of red blood cell distribution width in diagnosis of patients with colorectal cancer. Clin Chim Acta, 2018; 479:98–102.
14.
FancelluA, ZinelluA, MangoniAA, et al.Red Blood Cell Distribution Width (RDW) correlates to the anatomical location of colorectal cancer. Implications for clinical use. J Gastrointest Cancer, 2022; 53(2):259–264.
15.
HaenggiE, Kaegi-BraunN, WunderleC, et al.Red blood cell distribution width (RDW) - A new nutritional biomarker to assess nutritional risk and response to nutritional therapy? Clin Nutr, 2024; 43(2):575–585.
16.
SalvagnoGL, Sanchis-GomarF, PicanzaA, et al.Red blood cell distribution width: A simple parameter with multiple clinical applications. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci, 2015; 52(2):86–105.
17.
HoffmannJJML, NabbeKCAM, van den BroekNMA. Effect of age and gender on reference intervals of red blood cell distribution width (RDW) and mean red cell volume (MCV). Clin Chem Lab Med, 2015; 53(12):2015–2019.
18.
PillingLC, AtkinsJL, DuffMO, et al.Red blood cell distribution width: Genetic evidence for aging pathways in 116,666 volunteers. PLoS One, 2017; 12(9):e0185083.
19.
PlutaM, KlocekT, KrzychŁJ. Diagnostic accuracy of red blood cell distribution width in predicting in-hospital mortality in patients undergoing high-risk gastrointestinal surgery. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther, 2018; 50(4):277–282.
20.
YinP, LvH, ZhangL, et al.Combination of red cell distribution width and American Society of Anesthesiologists score for hip fracture mortality prediction. Osteoporos Int, 2016; 27(6):2077–2087.
21.
ZhanZ, FeiZ, XuB, et al.Prognostic Significance of Red Cell Distribution Width in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients. Clin Lab, 2021; 67(4).
22.
PengD, LiZW, LiuF, et al.Predictive value of red blood cell distribution width and hematocrit for short-term outcomes and prognosis in colorectal cancer patients undergoing radical surgery. World J Gastroenterol, 2024; 30(12):1714–1726.
23.
DaiY, SunG, HuH, et al.Risk factors for postoperative pulmonary complications in elderly patients receiving elective colorectal surgery: A retrospective study. Front Oncol, 2022; 12:1002025.
24.
SatoR, OikawaM, KakitaT, et al.Prognostic significance of the mean corpuscular volume (MCV) and red cell distribution width (RDW) in obstructive colorectal cancer patients with a stent inserted as a bridge to curative surgery. Surg Today, 2022; 52(12):1699–1710.
25.
PaliogiannisP, AtteneF, PorcuA, et al.Red cell distribution width and mean platelet volume as predictors of anastomotic dehiscence in colorectal surgery A pilot multicenter case-match study. Ann Ital Chir, 2018; 89:419–424.
26.
JessenM, NerstrømM, WilbekTE, et al.Risk factors for clinical anastomotic leakage after right hemicolectomy. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2016; 31(9):1619–1624.
27.
Nordholm-CarstensenA, RasmussenMS, KrarupPM. Increased leak rates following stapled versus handsewn ileocolic anastomosis in patients with right-sided colon cancer: A nationwide cohort study. Dis Colon Rectum, 2019; 62(5):542–548.
28.
2015 European Society of Coloproctology collaborating group. The relationship between method of anastomosis and anastomotic failure after right hemicolectomy and ileo-caecal resection: An international snapshot audit. Colorectal Dis, 2017.
29.
JuvikAF, NielsenS, TolstrupMB, et al.Anastomotic technique is not associated with leakage rate after right hemicolectomy. Dan Med J, 2020; 67(9):A01200014.
30.
RicciC, CasadeiR, AlagnaV, et al.A critical and comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing intracorporeal and extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2017; 402(3):417–427.
31.
WeiP, LiY, GaoJ, et al.Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials. Dig Surg, 2024; 41(5–6):224–244.
32.
BrunnerM, BondartschukK, DenzA, et al.Intracorporeal stapled versus extracorporeal hand-sewn anastomosis in minimal-invasive right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision - a retrospective single center analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2025; 410(1):180.
33.
WeiP, GaoJ, WuS, et al.; COLOR IV study group. Short-term outcomes of extracorporeal versus intracorporeal side-to-side anastomosis after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for colon cancer: An affiliated study of a multicenter snapshot study. Surg Endosc, 2025; 39(4):2630–2640.
34.
ShiC, XieM, LiL, et al.The association and diagnostic value of red blood cell distribution width in colorectal cancer. Medicine (Baltimore), 2019; 98(19):e15560.
35.
PedrazzaniC, TripepiM, TurriG, et al.Prognostic value of red cell distribution width (RDW) in colorectal cancer. Results from a single-center cohort on 591 patients. Sci Rep, 2020; 10(1):1072.
36.
SongY, HuangZ, KangY, et al.Clinical Usefulness and Prognostic Value of Red Cell Distribution Width in Colorectal Cancer. Biomed Res Int, 2018; 2018:9858943.
37.
KarayigitA, OzdemirDB, DizenH, et al.Role of red cell distribution width in colorectal cancer diagnosis and prognosis. J Health Sci Med/JHSM. May, 2022; 5(3):875–881.
38.
LiY, XingC, WeiM, et al.Combining Red Blood Cell Distribution Width (RDW-CV) and CEA Predict Poor Prognosis for Survival Outcomes in Colorectal Cancer. J Cancer, 2019; 10(5):1162–1170.
39.
WangPF, SongSY, GuoH, et al.Prognostic role of pretreatment red blood cell distribution width in patients with cancer: A meta-analysis of 49 studies. J Cancer, 2019; 10(18):4305–4317.
40.
LuoJ, ZhuP, ZhouS. Association between the red blood cell distribution width-to-albumin ratio and risk of colorectal and gastric cancers: A cross-sectional study using NHANES 2005–2018. BMC Gastroenterol, 2025; 25(1):316.
41.
LuC, LongJ, LiuH, et al.Red blood cell distribution width-to-albumin ratio is associated with all-cause mortality in cancer patients. J Clin Lab Anal, 2022 May;36(5):e24423.
