How Do we Know what the Visitor Knows?: Learning from Interpretation

Abstract

This paper presents a number of ideas for readers interested in finding what visitors learn from interpretation. First, some ideas from basic research in different fields of psychology promise applications of interest to interpreters. These ideas range from need for cognition to the newer definition of learning that emphasizes cognitive processes. I have termed these ideas a “top-down” application of knowledge from other fields to visitor studies. A second source of information about visitor learning comes from “bottom-up” efforts that are bringing forth ideas directly out of empirical research in visitor studies. Data-based studies are being used to suggest learning concepts specifically developed for visitor studies and thereby relevant to interpretation. A third source of information is the development of a process model of evaluation for exhibits and visitor-based programs. While this model is currently used to acquire information for decision making, it could hold promise for more intensive studies of visitor learning.

Keywords

Visitor learning learning and evaluation cognition learning research intrinsic motivation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bitgood

(1990). Introduction: Visitor studies in 1990. In Bitgood

, Benefield

, & Patterson

(Eds.), Visitor studies: Theory, research, and practice, Vol. 3 (pp. 7–15). Jacksonville, AL: Center for Social Design.

Bitgood

(1994). A primer on memory for visitor study professionals. Visitor Behavior, 9 (2), 4–8.

Borun

(1989). Naive notions and the design of science museum exhibits. In Bitgood

, Benefield

, & Patterson

(Eds.), Visitor studies: Theory, research and practice, Volume 2 (pp. 158–162). Jacksonville, AL: Center for Social Design.

Borun

, Massey

, & Lutter

(1993). Naive knowledge and the design of science museum exhibits. Curator, 36 (3), 201–219.

Cacioppo

J. T.

, & Petty

R. E.

(1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116–131.

Cacioppo

J. T.

, Petty

R. E.

, Kao

C. F.

, & Rodriquez

(1986). Central and peripheral routes to persuasion: An individual differences perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1032–1043.

Csikszentmihalyi

, & Hermanson

(1995). Intrinsic motivation in museums: What makes visitors want to learn? Museum News, 74 (3), 34–63.

Falk

, & Dierking

(1995). Public institutions for personal learning: Establishing a research agenda. Washington, DC: American Association of Museums.

Graft

(1989). Incorporating evaluation into the interpretive planning process at Colonial Williamsburg. In Bitgood

, Benefield

, & Patterson

(Eds.), Visitor studies: Theory, research and practice, Vol. 2 (pp. 133–139). Jacksonville, AL: Center for Social Design.

10.

Koran

J. J.

, Koran

M. L.

, & Foster

J. S.

(1989). The (potential) contributions of cognitive psychology to visitor studies. In Bitgood

, Benefield

, & Patterson

(Eds.), Visitor studies: Theory, research and practice, Vol. 2 (pp. 72–79). Jacksonville, AL: Center for Social Design.

11.

Matlin

M. W.

(1994). Cognition (3rd ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt-Brace.

12.

Perry

(1993). Measuring learning with the knowledge hierarchy. In Thompson

, Bitgood

, Benefield

, Shettel

, & Williams

(Eds.), Visitor studies: Theory, research and practice, Vol. 6 (pp. 73–78). Jacksonville, AL: Center for Social Design.

13.

Salmi

(1993). Science centre education: Motivation and learning in informal education. Research Report 119. Helsinki, Finland: Department of Teacher Education, University of Helsinki.

14.

Screven

C. G.

(1990). Uses of evaluation before, during, and after exhibit design. ILVS Review: A Journal of Visitor Behavior, 1 (2), 36–67.

15.

Webb

(1996). Comparing low-involved and high-involved visitors: The levels of processing model of cognitive psychology. Paper presented at the 9th annual Visitor Studies Conference, Estes Park, CO. August 26, 1996.