Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Heritage interpretation lacks a unifying framework for training, planning, and delivery that integrates ethical, emotional, and practical communication skills. This article introduces Aristotle’s concept of eunoia—goodwill toward the audience—as a missing cornerstone not currently addressed in the field. It argues that eunoia can function as both an integrative ethos framework and a cognitive schema that unites existing techniques such as trust-building and dialogic responsiveness under a coherent ethical orientation. By cultivating eunoia, interpreters can enhance credibility, foster meaningful audience connections, and develop a more reflective, audience-centred practice. The article concludes with a call for future research on how eunoia can be systematically integrated into interpretation.

Keywords

eunoia heritage interpretation interpreter training audience engagement trust-building ethical communication rhetorical ethos goodwill

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aideed

Elbaz

A. M.

Salem

I. E.

Hussein

Elzek

(2025). The power of professionalism: Enhancing tour guide impact on visitors’ experience and satisfaction to foster visitor sustainable behaviour. Tourism and Hospitality Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/14673584251350782

Alshammari

(2023). Captology in game-based education: A theoretical framework for the design of persuasive games. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(5), 2947–2966. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1915803

Anderson

(2004). Preface. In Anderson

(Ed.), Reinventing the museum: Historical and contemporary perspectives on the paradigm shift (pp. 1–7). Bloomsbury Academic.

Anderson

J. R.

(2000). Cognitive psychology and its implications. Worth Publishers.

Beck

Cable

(1998). Interpretation for the 21st century: Fifteen guiding principles for interpreting nature and culture. Sagamore Publishing.

Bedford

(2014). The art of museum exhibitions. Left Coast Press.

Bell

R. A.

Daly

J. A.

(1984). The affinity-seeking function of communication. Communication Monographs, 51(2), 91–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758409390188

Black

(2018). Meeting the audience challenge in the ‘age of participation’. Museum Management and Curatorship, 33(4), 302–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647775.2018.1469097

Bormanaki

Khoshhal

(2017). The role of equilibration in Piaget’s theory of cognitive development and its implication for receptive skills: A theoretical study. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 8(5), 996–1005. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0805.22

10.

Falk

J. H.

Dierking

L. D.

(2011). The museum experience. Routledge.

11.

Fattorello

Way

(2015). The theory of the social practice of information. Palgrave Macmillan.

12.

Finn

A. N.

Schrodt

Witt

P. L.

Ellege

Jernberg

K. A.

Larson

L. M.

(2009). A meta-analytical review of teacher credibility and its associations with teacher behaviors and student outcomes. Communication Education, 58(4), 516–537. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520903131154

13.

Garton

(1995). Social interaction and the development of language and cognition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

14.

Gildenhard

(2011). Cicero: Against Verres, 2.1.53–86. OpenBook Publishers.

15.

Gilson

Kool

(2019). The place of inspiration in heritage interpretation: A conceptual analysis. Journal of Interpretation Research, 24(1), 27–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/109258721902400103

16.

González

M. E.

Ceballos

I. L.

Díaz

M. V.

Achútegui

M. R.

Marco

À. A.

(Eds.). (2024). Heritage interpretation: A look from Europe. European Heritage Hub. https://www.europeanheritagehub.eu/document/handbook-of-best-practice-heritage-interpretation-a-look-from-europe/

17.

Ham

S. H.

(2013). Interpretation: Making a difference on purpose. Fulcrum Publishing.

18.

Hardin

(2002). Trust and trustworthiness. Russell Sage Foundation.

19.

Haug

(2017). Educating ethical designers. Journal of Technology and Design Education, 27, 655–665. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-016-9367-y

20.

M.-U.

(2013). Testing a model of effective interpretation to boost the heritage tourism experience: A case study in Macao. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 21(6), 900–914. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2012.750328

21.

Jauquet

(2024). Trends in the transformation economy. Lannoo Publishers.

22.

Jiang

Imon

S. S.

Chen

(2023). Professional competence development of heritage guides. Journal of Heritage Tourism, 18(5), 676–690. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743873X.2023.2234056

23.

Jones

B. J.

(2005). Establishing identification in virtual science museums: Creating connections and community. In Hin

L. T.

Subramaniam

(Eds.), E-learning and virtual science centers (pp. 1–27). Information Science Publishing.

24.

Jørgensen

Villadsen

(2009). Retorik: Teori og praksis. Samfundslitteratur.

25.

Kent

M. L.

Taylor

(2002). Toward a dialogic theory of public relations. Public Relations Review, 28(1), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(02)00108-X

26.

Lerner

A. S.

(2018). Medical narratives in rhetorical context: Ethically researching anti-vaccinationists. Technical Communication Quarterly, 27(1), 80–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2018.1399750

27.

Lewicki

R. J.

McAllister

D. J.

Bies

R. J.

(1998). Trust and disrupt: New relationships and realities. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 438–458. https://doi.org/10.2307/259288

28.

Littlejohn

S. W.

Foss

K. A.

(2009). Encyclopedia of communication theory. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412959384

29.

Liu

Lei

(2024). Ethical issues in online interpreting training. Journal of China Computer-Assisted Language Learning, 4(2), 326–345. https://doi.org/10.1515/jccall-2022-0011

30.

Yuxi

(2025). Drama in museums: Redefining museums as an interdisciplinary. IntechOpen. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.1011732

31.

Ludwig

(2015). The interpretive guide: Sharing heritage with people. Bildungswerk Interpretation.

32.

Lundholt

M. W.

Hansen

P. K.

(2019). Kommunikationsmodeller. Samfundslitteratur.

33.

Markus

(1977). Self-schemata and processing information about the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35(2), 63–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.35.2.63

34.

May

J. M.

(1988). Trials of character: The eloquence of Ciceronian ethos. University of North Carolina Press.

35.

McCroskey

J. C.

(1966). Scales for the measurement of ethos. Speech Monographs, 33(1), 65–72.

36.

McCroskey

J. C.

(2016). An introduction to rhetorical communication: A Western cultural perspective (9th ed.). Routledge.

37.

McKee

H. A.

Porter

J. E.

(2017). Professional communication and network interaction: A rhetorical and ethical approach. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315197692

38.

Moscardo

(1996). Mindful visitors: Heritage and tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 23(2), 376–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-7383(95)00068-2

39.

Nowacki

(2021). Heritage interpretation and sustainable development: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 13(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084383

40.

Petenaude

H. K.

Bloomfield

E. F.

(2022). Topical analysis of nuclear experts' perceptions of publics, nuclear energy, and sustainable futures. Frontiers in Communication, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2022.762101

41.

Pierssenè

(1999). Explaining our world: An approach to the art of environmental interpretation. E & FN Spon.

42.

Pike

M. A.

(2015). Ethical English. Bloomsbury.

43.

Pine

B. J.

Gilmore

J. H.

(2013). The experience economy: Past, present, and future. In Sundbo

Sørensen

(Eds.), Handbook on the experience economy (pp. 21–44). Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781004227.00007

44.

Porter

J. E.

(2017). Professional communication as phatic: From classical eunoia to personal artificial intelligence. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 80(2), 174–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329490616671708

45.

Powell

R. B.

Stern

M. J.

(2013). Is it the program or the interpreter? Modeling the influence of program characteristics and interpreter attributes on visitor outcomes. Journal of Interpretation Research, 18(2), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/109258721301800203

46.

Powell

R. B.

Stern

M. J.

(2024). A call for investment in interpretation research. Journal of Interpretation Research, 29(2), 43–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/10925872241302976

47.

Rasmussen

C. H.

(2016). Formidlingsstrategier: En grundbog om kulturinstitutionernes formidling. Samfundslitteratur.

48.

Rayner

Williams

H. M.

Lawton

Allinson

C. W.

(2011). Public service ethos: Developing a generic measure. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(1), 27–51. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq016

49.

Rickly

Sharma

Canavan

(2023). Authenticity: The state-of-the-art in tourism geographies. Tourism Geographies, 27(3–4), 528–537. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2023.2290017

50.

Rydén

Ringberg

Wilke

(2015). How managers’ shared mental models of business-customer interactions create different sensemaking of social media. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 31(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2015.03.001

51.

Spitzberg

B. H.

Cupach

W. R.

(1984). Interpersonal communication competence. Sage Publications.

52.

Staiff

(2014). Re-imagining heritage interpretation: Enchanting the past-future. Ashgate.

53.

Stephen

Mather Training Center. (2017, December). Forging connections through audience-centered experiences: Interpretive workbook. National Park Service. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5bb1590ba0cd27445d75e70f/t/60f5c7aed21fe135ea10d4d4/1626720176313/ACE+Interp+Workbook+-+2017+-+December.pdf

54.

Stern

M. J.

Coleman

K. J.

(2015). The multidimensionality of trust: Applications in collaborative natural resource management. Society & Natural Resources, 28(2), 117–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2014.945062

55.

Stern

M. J.

Powell

R. B.

(2013). What leads to better visitor outcomes in live interpretation? Journal of Interpretation Research, 18(2), 9–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/109258721301800202

56.

Sumanapala

Wolf

D. I.

Galahitiyawe

N. W.

(2025). Assessing tour guides’ self-leadership qualities in a developing country. Journal of Interpretation Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/10925872251341836

57.

Tahin

(2022). Heuristic rhetoric: Principles and practice. Palgrave Macmillan.

58.

Tilden

(1977). Interpreting our heritage. University of North Carolina Press.

59.

Tilken

(2017). Professional development in heritage interpretation: Manual. InHerit project.

60.

Topa-Bryniarska

(2023). Discursive strategies of persuasion in the film review genre. In Wei

Schnell

(Eds.), Routledge handbook of descriptive rhetorical studies and world languages (pp. 345–364). Routledge.

61.

Vygotskij

L. S.

(1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

62.

Weiler

Sam

H. H.

(2010). Development of a research instrument for evaluating the visitor outcomes of face-to-face interpretation. Visitor Studies, 13(2), 187–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/10645578.2010.509697

63.

Yamada

Skibins

J. C.

(2020). Effectiveness of interpreter training in the Japanese interpretive context and opportunities for improving interpretation. Journal of Interpretation Research, 24(1), 85–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/109258721902400106

64.

Yenawine

(2013). Visual thinking strategies: Using art to deepen learning across school disciplines. Harvard Education Press.

65.

Žmavc

(2012). The ethos of classical rhetoric: From epieikeia to auctoritas. In van Eemeren

Garssen

(Eds.), Topical themes in argumentation theory: Twenty exploratory studies (pp. 181–191). Springer.

Establishing Eunoia in Interpretation: A Conceptual Proposal for Future Research and Practice

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References