The Utility of GIS for Identifying Areas of Recreation Conflict for Targeted Interpretive Messaging

Abstract

Past research has extensively studied interpretive messaging and visitor conflict within parks and protected areas. However, comprehensive understanding of how to identify trailside interpretive sign locations is lacking. The purpose of this study was to introduce an approach using geographic information systems (GIS) that supplements decision-making regarding sign placement. The study site was Grand Canyon National Park’s Rim to Rim (R2R) corridor. To identify sign placement locations, two analytical phases were conducted. First, GPS data loggers were distributed to visitors and their travel patterns were analyzed for spatial behaviors and spatial interactions that are known to influence the likelihood of recreation conflict. Specifically, locations with a high variance of visitor travel speeds and locations with concentrated visitor use were identified. Second, geographic data were analyzed to identify locations for a combination of features that together influence the likelihood of recreation conflict. Specifically, popular bidirectional trail segments with significant elevation change were identified. We reported these locations and areas using GPS coordinates for evaluation by future research. This research was a necessary step towards comprehensively understanding how to identify locations for interpretive signs.

Keywords

concentrated visitor use elevation change GIS GPS data loggers interpretive messaging sign placement variance of speed

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bacher

Baltrus

Barrie

Bliss

Cardea

Chandler

Lacome

(2007). Foundational competencies for all NPS interpreters. https://www.nps.gov/idp/interp/101/foundationscurriculum.pdf

Beck

Cable

T. T.

Knudson

D. M.

(2018). Interpreting cultural and natural heritage: For a better world. Sagamore Publishing.

Beeco

J. A.

Brown

(2013). Integrating space, spatial tools, and spatial analysis into the human dimensions of parks and outdoor recreation. Applied Geography, 38, 76–85.

Bradford

(2005). Off the beaten track: Messaging as a means to reducing depreciative behaviour in a national park [Doctoral dissertation]. Lakehead University.

ESRI. (2020). ArcGIS Release 10.8.0. Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI).

GAIA GPS. (2020). GAIA GPS find your adventure. https://www.gaiagps.com

Goodchild

M. F.

(2020). Beyond Tobler’s Hiking Function. Geographical Analysis, 52(4), 558–569.

Google Earth. (2020). United States. Imagery date: 12/13/2015. 36°57′11.58″N, 95°57′22.78″W. Eye alt 2,929. 74 miles. SIO, NOAA, U.S. Navy, NGA, GEBCO. Image Landsat/Copernicus. https://www.earth.google.com

Hall

T. E.

Ham

S. H.

Lackey

B. K.

(2010). Comparative evaluation of the attention capture and holding power of novel signs aimed at park visitors. Journal of Interpretation Research, 15(1), 15–36.

10.

Hockett

K. S.

Marion

J. L.

Leung

Y. F.

(2017). The efficacy of combined educational and site management actions in reducing off-trail hiking in an urban-proximate protected area. Journal of Environmental Management, 203, 17–28.

11.

Hughes

Morrison-Saunders

(2002). Impact of trail-side interpretive signs on visitor knowledge. Journal of Ecotourism, 1(2–3), 122–132.

12.

Kidd

A. M.

Monz

D’Antonio

Manning

R. E.

Reigner

Goonan

K. A.

Jacobi

(2015). The effect of minimum impact education on visitor spatial behavior in parks and protected areas: An experimental investigation using GPS-based tracking. Journal of Environmental Management, 162, 53–62.

13.

Koenen

Legg

Darville

(2007). Monitoring visitor behavior at interpretive waysides at Muir Woods National Monument. In 2007 interpretive sourcebook (pp. 104–105). National Association of Interpretation.

14.

Lackey

B. K.

Ham

S. H.

(2003). Assessment of communication focused on human-black bear conflict at Yosemite National Park. Journal of Interpretation Research, 8(1), 25–40.

15.

Leave No Trace. (2021). Principle 7: Be Considerate of Other Visitors. https://lnt.org/why/7-principles/be-considerate-of-other-visitors/

16.

Manning

(2011). Studies in outdoor recreation: Search and research for satisfaction (3rd ed.). Oregon State University Press.

17.

Manning

R. E.

Anderson

L. E.

Pettengill

(2017). Managing outdoor recreation: Case studies in the national parks. CABI.

18.

Marschall

Granquist

S. M.

Burns

G. L.

(2017). Interpretation in wildlife tourism: Assessing the effectiveness of signage on visitor behaviour at a seal watching site in Iceland. Journal of outdoor recreation and tourism, 17, 11–19.

19.

National Park Service. (2019a). Phantom ranch information. https://www.nps.gov/grca/learn/photosmultimedia/grand-canyon-in-depth-03.htm

20.

National Park Service. (2019b). Trail courtesy practices that leave no trace. https://www.nps.gov/grca/planyourvisit/courtesy.htm

21.

Peterson

B. A.

Brownlee

M. T.

Hallo

J. C.

Beeco

J. A.

White

D. L.

Zajchowski

C. A.

Bowen

B. B.

(2020). Grid analysis of visitor travel patterns in a dispersed outdoor recreation setting. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.18666/jpra-2020-10646

22.

Peterson

B. A.

Brownlee

M. T.

Marion

J. L.

(2018). Mapping the relationships between trail conditions and experiential elements of long-distance hiking. Landscape and Urban Planning, 180, 60–75.

23.

Plummer

(2009). Outdoor recreation: An introduction. Routledge.

24.

Reichhart

Arnberger

(2010). Exploring the influence of speed, social, managerial and physical factors on shared trail preferences using a 3D computer animated choice experiment. Landscape and Urban Planning, 96(1), 1–11.

25.

Riungu

G. K.

Peterson

B. A.

Beeco

J. A.

Brown

(2018). Understanding visitors’ spatial behavior: A review of spatial applications in parks. Tourism Geographies, 20(5), 833–857.

26.

Roggenbuck

J. W.

(1992). Use of persuasion to reduce resource impacts and visitor conflicts. In Manffedo

M. J.

(Ed.), Influencing human behaviour: Theory and applications in recreation, tourism, and natural resources management (pp. 149–208). Sagamore Publishing Company Inc.

27.

Schneider

I. E.

(2000). Revisiting and revising recreation conflict research. Journal of Leisure Research, 32(1), 129–132.

28.

Sharp

R. L.

Cable

T. T.

Burns

(2019). The application of GPS visitor tracking: Implications for interpretation at heritage sites. Journal of Interpretation Research, 24(1), 93–98.

29.

Stack

D. W.

Peter

Manning

R. E.

Fristrup

K. M.

(2011). Reducing visitor noise levels at Muir Woods National Monument using experimental management. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 129(3), 1375–1380.

30.

Stamberger

van Riper

C. J.

Keller

Brownlee

Rose

(2018). A GPS tracking study of recreationists in an Alaskan protected area. Applied Geography, 93, 92–102.

31.

Tobler

W. R.

(1993). Non-isotropic geographic modeling. In Tobler

W. R.

(Ed.), Three presentations on geographical analysis and modeling (Technical report 93–1). National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis.

32.

Vagias

W. M.

Powell

R. B.

(2010). Backcountry visitors’ leave no trace attitudes. International Journal of Wilderness, 16(3), 21–27.