The purpose of this qualitative study was to evaluate the experience of underserved fourth-grade students participating in the National Park Service's Every Kid in a Park (EKIP) initiative through the Into the Redwood Forest (IRF) education program at Muir Woods National Monument. The project's aim was to understand the experience of underserved diverse students (i.e., race and ethnicity, gender, and Title I schools) participating during the 2015–2016 school year. The study included six teacher interviews and document review procedure of 60 student journals. The findings reveal that the EKIP exposed students to parks, the inquiry-based learning proved effective for outdoor learning, and the impact of the nature experience encouraged environmental stewardship. Implications and recommendations for further implementation of both the EKIP initiative and IRF at Muir Woods are discussed.
BixlerR. D., & FloydM. F. (1997). Nature is scary, disgusting, and uncomfortable.Environment and behavior, 29 (4), 443–467.
4.
BowenG. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method.Qualitative Research Journal, 9 (2), 27–40.
5.
BrannenJ. (2005). Mixing methods: The entry of qualitative and quantitative approaches into the research process.International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8 (3), 173–184.
6.
BraunV., and ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology.Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3 (2), 77–101.
7.
BrodyM. (2005). Learning in nature.Environmental Education Research, 11 (5), 603–621.
8.
EloS., & KyngäsH. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process.Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62 (1), 107–115.
KrippendorffK. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
LarsonL.R., CastleberryS.B., & GreenG.T. (2010). Effects of an environmental education program on the environmental orientations of children from different gender, age, and ethnic groups.Journal of Park & Recreation Administration, 28 (3), 95–113.
16.
LouvR. (2008). Last child in the woods: Saving our children from Nature-Deficit Disorder.New York: Workman Publishing.
17.
MarxR. W., BlumenfeldP. C., KrajcikJ. S., FishmanB., SolowayE., GeierR., & TalR. T. (2004). Inquiry-based science in the middle grades: Assessment of learning in urban systemic reform.Journal of research in Science Teaching, 41 (10), 1063–1080.
National Park Foundation. (2001). PARKS: Parks as Resources for Knowledge in Science: National Program Evaluation Final Report.Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University Printing Facility.
23.
OutleyC.W., & WittP.A. (2006). Working with diverse youth: Guidelines for achieving youth cultural competency in recreation services.Journal of Park & Recreation Administration, 24 (4), 111–126.
24.
PaisleyK., JostadJ., SibthorpJ., PohjaM., GookinJ., & Rajagopal-DurbinA. (2014). Considering students’ experiences in diverse groups: Case studies from the National Outdoor Leadership School.Journal of Leisure Research, 46 (3), 329–341.
25.
PatchenT., & Cox-PetersenA. (2008). Constructing cultural relevance in science: A case study of two elementary teachers.Science Education, 92 (6), 994–1014.
26.
RozenszaynR., & AssarafO. B. (2011). When Collaborative Learning Meets Nature: Collaborative Learning as a Meaningful Learning Tool in the Ecology Inquiry Based Project.Research in Science Education, 41 (1), 123–146. doi: 10.1007/s11165-009-9149-6
27.
ScottG., BoydM., & ColquhounD. (2013). Changing spaces, changing relationships: The positive impact of learning out of doors.Australian Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education, 17 (1), 47–53.
28.
TardonaD.R., BozemanB.A., & PiersonK.L. (2014). A program encouraging healthy behavior, nature exploration, and recreation through history in an urban national park unit.Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 32 (2), 73–82.
ThomsonG., HoffmanJ., & StaniforthS. (2003). Measuring the success of environmental education programs.Ottawa: Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society and Sierra Club of Canada.
U.S. National Park Service (2003). Field guide to national park labs.Washington, DC: National Park Foundation.
34.
U.S. National Park Service (2006). Guidelines and submission form for expedited review of NPS sponsored public surveys, focus groups and field experiments.Washington, DC: National Park Service.
35.
WarrenK., RobertsN.S., BreunigM., & AlvarezM.G. (2014). Social justice in outdoor experiential education: A state of knowledge review.Journal of Experiential Education, 37 (1), 89–103. doi: 10.1177/105382591351889.
36.
WuH.K., & HsiehC.E. (2006). Developing sixth graders’ inquiry skills to construct explanations in inquiry-based learning environments.International Journal of Science Education, 28 (11), 1289–1313.
