Within this short research report, the author provides a succinct introduction to ethnographic fieldwork in a Midwestern U.S. state park and exhibits a small sample of data gathered from park interpretive naturalists that highlights ways that a group of naturalists perceive the construction of memories. Subsequently, the author explores a salient interpretation from the data, in which memories are dependent upon shared experiences and interactions. By highlighting one specific group of naturalists, this research sheds light on how they conceive their role in the memory construction of others.
BeckL., & CableT. (2002). Interpretation for the 21st century: Fifteen guiding principles for interpreting nature and culture.Champaign, IL: Sagamore Publishing.
2.
BrandtC. B. (2013). Landscapes as contexts for learning. In StevensonR. B., BrodyM., DillonJ., & WalsA. (Eds.), International handbook of research on environmental education (pp. 275–283). New York, NY: Routledge.
3.
ChenW. L. J., SelinS., HanhamR., OdellK., & PierskallaC. (2003). The craft and concepts of interpretation: A look at how national park service interpreters reveal and facilitate opportunities for connections (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). West Virginia UniversityMorgantown.
4.
DecM. (2004). Legacy.Journal of Interpretation Research, 9 (2), 73–76.
5.
MeashamT. G. (2006). Learning about environments: The significance of primal landscapes.Environmental Management, 38 (3), 426–434.
6.
TildenF. (1977). Interpreting our heritage (2nd ed.). Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
7.
TurekE. M. (2006). Form follows function: Interpretive wisdom for environmental educators.Journal of Interpretation Research, 11 (2), 47–51.
