Interpretation designed to increase public understanding and appreciation of environmental issues can provide support for management actions in protected areas, but the relative impact of different interpretive strategies on public awareness and attitudes has not been adequately explored. The purpose of this research was to compare the effects of two interpretive programs (a non-personal, visual-based flyer and an interpersonal, audio-based talk) relative to a control group on visitors’ knowledge of, attitudes toward, and support for invasive species management at Cumberland Island National Seashore, Georgia. In general, the interpretive talk appeared to be more effective than the flyer at increasing awareness and generating support for invasive species management. Although visitors exposed to each of the treatments displayed greater knowledge of invasive species, effects on attitudes and management preferences were minimal. Future research examining the effects of interpretive media on public awareness of and support for controversial management decisions could therefore explore mechanisms for maximizing the impact of interpretive programming on visitors’ attitudes and preferences.
AbsherJ., & GraefeA. (1997). Trip motives of interpretive program attendees and nonattendees.Journal of Interpretation Research, 2 (1), 55–56.
2.
AbsherJ. D., VaskeJ. J., & BrightA. D. (2008). Basic beliefs, attitudes, and social norms regarding wildland fire management in southern California. In ChavezD. J., AbsherJ. D., & WinterP. L. (Eds.), Fire Social Science Research from the Pacific Southwest Research Station: Studies Supported by National Fire Plan Funds.Albany, CA: United States Forest Service.
3.
BallantyneR., PackerJ., & BeckmannE. (1998). Targeted interpretation: Exploring relationships among visitors’ motivations, activities, attitudes, information needs and preferences.Journal of Tourism Studies, 9 (2), 14–25.
4.
BeckmannE. A. (1999). Evaluating visitors’ reactions to interpretation in Australian national parks.Journal of Interpretation Research, 4 (1), 27–30.
5.
BremnerA., & ParkK. (2007). Public attitudes to the management of invasive non-native species in Scotland.Biological Conservation, 139 (3-4), 306–314.
6.
BrightA.D., FishbeinM., ManfredoM.J., and BathA. (1993). Application of the theory of reasoned action to the National Park Service's controlled burn policy.Journal of Leisure Research, 25 (3), 263–280.
7.
BrooksJ. J., WarrenR. J., NelmsM. G., & TarrantM. A. (1999). Visitor Attitudes toward and Knowledge of Restored Bobcats on Cumberland Island National Seashore, Georgia.Wildlife Society Bulletin, 27 (4), 1089–1097.
8.
ChristensenN., BartuskaA., BrownJ., CarpenterS., D'AntonioC., FrancisR., FranklinJ., MacMahonJ., NossR., ParsonsD., PetersonC., TurnerM., & WoodmanseeR. (1996). The report of the ecological society of America committee on the scientific basis for ecosystem management.Ecological Applications, 6 (3), 665–691.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
11.
CortnerH., & MooteM. (1999). The politics of ecosystem management.Washington, DC: Island Press.
12.
CoyleK. (2005). Environmental literacy in America: What ten years of NEETF/Roper research and related studies say about environmental literacy in the U.S.Washington, DC: The National Environmental Education & Training Foundation.
13.
Dettmann-EaslerD., & PeaseJ. L. (1999). Evaluating the effectiveness of residential environmental education programs in fostering positive attitudes towards wildlife.Journal of Environmental Education, 31 (1), 33–40.
14.
DillmanD. A. (2007). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method.Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Son, Inc.
15.
DilsaverL., (2004). Cumberland Island National Seashore: A History of Conservation Conflict.University of Virginia PressCharlottesville, VA.
16.
DiMauroD., & DietzT. (2001). Assessment of an interpretive program for U.S. Coast Guard personnel.Conservation Biology, 15 (3), 776–779.
17.
DustinD., & McAvoyL. (1985). Interpretation as a management tool: A dissenting opinion.The Interpreter, 16, 18–20.
18.
FalkJ. H. (2001). Free-choice science learning: Framing the discussion. In FalkJ. H. (Ed.), Free-choice science education: How we learn science outside of school.New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
19.
FerraroP. J., & PattanayakS. K. (2006). Money for nothing? A call for empirical evaluation of biodiversity conservation investments.PLoS Biology, 4 (4), 483–488.
20.
FraedrichS.W., HarringtonT.C., RabagliaR.J., UlyshenM.D., MayfieldA.E., HanulaJ.L., EickwortJ.M., & MillerD.R. (2008). A fungal symbiont of the Redbay Ambrosia Beetle causes a lethal wilt in Redbay and other lauraceae in the southeastern United States.Plant Disease, 92 (2), 215–224.
21.
GurevitchJ., & PadillaD. K. (2004). Are invasive species a major cause of extinctions?TRENDS in Ecology and Evolution, 19 (9), 470–474.
22.
HamS. H. (1992). Environmental interpretation: A practical guide for people with big ideas and small budgets.Golden, CO: Fulcrum Publishing.
23.
HamS. H., & WeilerB. (2002). Toward a theory of quality in cruise-based nature guiding.Journal of Interpretation Research, 7 (2), 29–49.
24.
HamS. H., & WeilerB. (2007). Isolating the role of on-site interpretation in a satisfying experience.Journal of Interpretation Research, 12 (2), 5–24.
25.
HammittW. E. (1984). Cognitive processes involved in environmental interpretation.Journal of Environmental Education15 (4): 11–15.
26.
HendeeJ.C., & DawsonC.P. (2002). Wilderness visitor management: Stewardship for quality experiences. In Wilderness Management: Stewardship and Protection of Resources and Values.Golden, CO: Fulcrum.
27.
HenkerK. B., & BrownG. (2011). As good as the real thing? A comparative study of interpretive podcasts and traditional ranger talks.Journal of Interpretation Research, 16 (1), 7–23.
28.
HoustonD.B., & SchreinerE.G. (1995). Alien species in National Parks: Drawing lines in space and time.Conservation Biology, 9 (1), 204–209.
29.
HughesM., HamS., & BrownT. (2009). Influencing park visitor behavior: A belief-based approach.Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 27 (4), 38–53.
30.
HughesM. (2004). Influence of varying intensities of natural on-site interpretation on attitudes and knowledge. Ph.D. Thesis, Murdoch University.
31.
KimA.K., AireyD., & SzivasE. (2011). The multiple assessment of interpretation effectiveness: Promoting visitors’ environmental attitudes and behavior.Journal of Travel Research, 50 (3), 321–334.
32.
KirkpatrickJ.F. (1995). Management of wild horses by fertility control: The Assategue experience.NPS Scientific Monograph, (26), p. 60.
33.
KnappD., & BentonG. M. (2004). Elements to successful interpretation: A multiple case study of five National Parks.Journal of Interpretation Research, 9 (2), 9–25.
34.
KnudsonD. M., CableT. T., & BeckL. (2003). Interpretation of cultural and natural resources (2nd ed.). State College, PA: Venture Publishing.
LouvR. (2005). Last Child in the Woods: Saving Our Children from Nature-Deficit Disorder.Chapel Hill, NC: Algonquin Books.
37.
MadinE.M.P., & FentonD.M. (2004). Environmental interpretation in the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park: An assessment of programme effectiveness.Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 12 (2), 121–137.
38.
MarionJ. L., & RogersC. S. (1994). The applicability of terrestrial visitor impact management strategies to the protection of coral reefs.Ocean & Coastal Management, 22, 153–163.
39.
MarionJ.L., & ReidS. (2007). Minimizing visitor impacts to protected areas: the efficacy of low impact education programmes.Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 15 (1), 5–27.
40.
MarynowskiS. B., and JacobsonS. K.1999. Ecosystem management education for public lands.Wildlife Society Bulletin27, 134–145.
41.
McNeelyJ. A. (1996). Human dimensions of invasive alien species: how global perspectives are relevant to China.Conserving China's biodiversity (II).Beijing, China Environmental Science Press, 169–181.
42.
McNeelyJ.A., (2001). The great reshuffling: Human dimensions of invasive alien species.Gland, Switzerland & Cambridge, UK: World Conservation Union (IUCN).
43.
McFarlaneB. L., & BoxallP. C. (2000). Factors influencing forest values and attitudes of two stakeholder groups: The case of the foothills model forest, Alberta, Canada.Society & Natural Resources, 13, 649–661.
44.
MonroeJ.K., Morrison-SundersA., and HughesM. (2008). Environmental interpretation evaluation in natural areas.Journal of Ecotourism, 7 (1), 1–13.
45.
MoscardoG. (1999). Communicating with two million tourists. A formative evaluation of an interpretive brochure.Journal of Interpretation Research, Special Issue: Interpretation in Australia, 4 (1), 21–37.
46.
NimmoD. G., & MillerK. K. (2007). Ecological and human dimensions of management of feral horses in Australia: a review.Wildlife Research, 34 (5), 408.
47.
NoveyL. T., & HallT. E. (2006). The effect of audio tours on learning and social interaction: An evaluation at Carlsbad Caverns National Park.Science Education, 91, 260–277.
OliverS.S., RoggenbuckJ.W., & WatsonA.E. (1985). Education to reduce impacts in forest campgrounds.Journal of Forestry, 83 (4), 234–236.
51.
OramsM. (1997). The effectiveness of environmental education: Can we turn tourists in “greenies?” Progress in Tourism and Hospitality Research, 3, 295–306.
52.
PettyR., & CacioppoJ. (1986). Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change.New York, USA: Springer-Verlag.
53.
PimentelD., ZunigaR., MorrsionD. (2005). Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States.Ecological Economics, 52, 273–288.
54.
PowellR. B., & HamS. H. (2008). Can ecotourism interpretation really lead to pro-conservation knowledge, attitudes and behavior? Evidence from the Galapagos Islands.Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 16 (4), 467–489.
55.
RikoonJ. S. (2006). Wild horses and the political ecology of nature restoration in the Missouri Ozarks.Geoforum, 37 (2), 200–211.
56.
RoggenbuckJ.W., & BerrierD.L. (1982). A comparison of the effectiveness of two communication strategies in dispersing wilderness campers.Journal of Leisure Research, 14, 77–89.
57.
RoggenbuckJ.W., & WatsonA.E. (1986). Providing information for management purposes. In: KulhavyD.L., ConnerR.N., eds. A symposium: Wilderness and natural areas in the eastern United States: A management challenge; 1985 May 13–15; Nacogdoches, TX., pps. 236–242.
58.
RoggenbuckJ. W., LoomisR. J., & DagostinoJ. (1991). The learning benefits of leisure.Journal of Leisure Research, 22 (2), 112–124.
59.
SellarsR.W. (1997). Preserving nature in the national parks.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
60.
SharpR. L., LarsonL. R., & GreenG. T. (2011). Factors influencing public preferences for invasive alien species management.Biological Conservation, 144, 2097–2104.
61.
SilvermanL. H., & BarrieE. R. (2000). Determining social science research needs in interpretation: A case study.Journal of Interpretation Research, 5 (1), 35–44.
62.
WiderC.J. and J.W. (2000). Reducing theft of petrified wood at Petrified Forest National Park.Journal of Interpretation Research, 5 (1), 1–18.
63.
WilesR., & HallT. (2005). Can interpretive messages change park visitors’ views on wildland fire?Journal of Interpretation Research, 10 (2), 18–35.
64.
WilliamsC. K., EricssonG., & HeberleinT. A. (2002). A Quantitative Summary of Attitudes toward Wolves and Their Reintroduction (1972–2000).Wildlife Society Bulletin, 30 (2), 575–584.
65.
ZeppelH., & MuloinS. (2008). Conservation and education benefits of interpretation on marine wildlife tours.Tourism in Marine Environments, 5 (2), 215–227.
