The colonial origins of museums have often influenced the ways in which they depict the past. In Australia, portrayals of the Indigenous past have focussed exclusively on “traditional life” or the prehistoric period of history, to the detriment of post-contact history. This paper examines ways in which museums around Australia are beginning to counter this trend. Museum exhibits that relate to Australia's shared, post-contact past are analyzed in the context of recent developments in museology. This analysis is combined with feedback generated from interviews with heritage professionals. The results suggest that in order to move towards inclusive interpretation of Australian history, multiple voices and perspectives of the past must be incorporated into interpretive programs. This paper argues that there are a variety of ways in which heritage interpreters can attempt to incorporate pluralist perspectives of the past into museum exhibits.
BattenB. (2005). From Prehistory to History: Shared Perspectives in Australian Heritage Interpretation. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Macquarie UniversitySydney, Australia.
2.
CaseyD. (2002). A Battleground of Ideas and Histories. In ReedD. (Ed.), Tangled Destinies: National Museum of Australia (pp. 18–21). Canberra: National Museum of Australia.
3.
ClarkI. (1994). Sharing History: A Sense for All Australians of a Shared Ownership of their History.Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
4.
Committee of Inquiry into Museums and National Collections. (1975). Museums in Australia, 1975: Report of the Committee of Inquiry on Museums and National Collections including the report of the Planning Committee on the Gallery of Aboriginal Australia.Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
5.
Commonwealth of Australia. (2003). Review of the National Museum of Australia - Its Exhibitions and Public Programs. A Report to the Council of the National Museum of Australia.
6.
DysartD. (Ed.). (2000). Edge of the Trees.Historic Houses Trust NSW.
7.
Harrow Promotion and Development Group. (n.d.). Historic Harrow: Victoria's Oldest Inland Town (Brochure).
8.
HinksonM. (2001). Aboriginal Sydney: A Guide to Important Places of the Past and Present.Canberra: Aboriginal Studies Press.
LawtonB. (2001). Understanding Aboriginal Perspectives of History and Heritage in Wyndham, Western Australia. Unpublished honor's thesis, Macquarie UniversitySydney, Australia.
14.
MacintyreS. (2003). The History Wars.Carlton, Victoria: Melbourne University Press.
15.
MorganJ. (2002, December 16). Review of National Museum “is Politically Motivated.” Sydney Morning Herald, p. 15.
SculthorpeG. (2001). Exhibiting Indigenous Histories in Australian Museums. In McIntyreD., & WehnerK. (Eds.), Negotiating Histories: National Museums: Conference Proceedings (pp. 73–84). Canberra: National Museum of Australia.
23.
SimpsonM. (2001). Making Representations: Museums in the post-ColonialEra (Revised Edition). New York: Routledge.
24.
The Metropolitan Land Council. (2003). The Art Community & the Sydney Metropolitan Land Council, Retrieved January 21, 2004 from http://www.artnews.com.au/madden.htm.
25.
TildenF. (1977). Interpreting Our Heritage (3rd ed.). Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
26.
WellerR. (2002). Mapping the Nation. In ReedD. (Ed.), Tangled Destinies: National Museum of Australia (pp. 124–137). Canberra: National Museum of Australia.
27.
WindschuttleK. (2001). How Not to Run a Museum.Quandrant, September 2001, pp. 11–19.
28.
ZeppelH. (1999). Who Were Bennelong and Pemulwuy? Museums in Sydney and Interpretation of Eora Aboriginal Culture.International Journal of Heritage Research, Volume 5 (Numbers 3 & 4), pp. 182–187.
