In 1997, the Neal Smith National Wildlife Refuge-Prairie Learning Center began offering on-site environmental education (EE) to school groups visiting their reconstructed tallgrass prairie. To evaluate the EE program, fourth-, fifth- and sixth-grade classes from central Iowa completed a pre- and post-visit knowledge and attitudes survey and results were compared with similar classes that did not visit the refuge. Results indicate a significant increase in knowledge and a positive change in attitudes in the treatment group two weeks after visiting the refuge compared with the control group. This research also tested the effectiveness of hands-on stewardship activities in changing knowledge and attitudes. No differences were detected in either knowledge or attitudes between treatment classes that participated in stewardship activities and treatment classes that did not.
AschJ., & ShoreB. M. (1975). Conservation behavior as the outcome of environmental education.Journal of Environmental Education, 6 (4): 25–33.
2.
ArmstrongJ. B., & ImparaJ. C. (1991). The impact of an environmental education program on knowledge and attitude.Journal of Environmental Education, 22(Summer): 36–40.
3.
BlanchardB. (1996a, March 25). National Policy Issuance #96-09: Executive Order 12996 - Management and General Public Use of the National Wildlife Refuge System.U.S. Fish and Wildlife ServiceWashington, DC. Retrieved June 3, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http://www.fws.gov/directives/npi96_09.html
4.
BlanchardB. (1996b, October 29). National Policy Issuance #96-10: The National Wildlife Refuge System - Promises for a New Century.U.S. Fish and Wildlife ServiceWashington, DC. Retrieved June 3, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http://www.fws.gov/directives/npi96_10.html
5.
BringleR. G., & HatcherJ. A. (1999). Reflection in service learning: making meaning of experience.Educational Horizons, Summer, 179–185.
6.
CarlsonJ. E., & BaumgartnerD. (1974). The effects of natural resource camps on youths.Journal of Environmental Education, 5 (3): 1–7.
7.
ChapinJ. R. (1998). Is service learning a good idea? data from the National Longitudinal Study of 1988.The Social Studies, (Sept./Oct.): 205–211.
8.
Dettman-EaslerD. D., & PeaseJ. L. (1999). Evaluating the effectiveness of residential environmental education programs in fostering positive attitudes toward wildlife.Journal of Environmental Education, 31 (1): 33–39.
9.
IgnatiukG. T. (1978). Influence of the amount of time spent in field trip activities on student attitude toward science and the environment.Regina, Saskatchewan: Saskatchewan School Trustees Association. ED 180 758.
10.
KellertS. R., & WesterveltM. O. (1983). Children's attitudes, knowledge and behaviors toward animals.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service.
11.
LeemingF. C., PorterB. E., DwyerW. O., CobernM. K., & OliverD. P. (1997). Effects of participation in class activities on children's environmental attitudes and knowledge.Journal of Environmental Education, 28 (2): 33–42.
12.
LikertR. (1957). Some applications of behavioural research.Paris: UNESCO.
13.
MacLachlanP. (1985). Sarah, plain and tall.New York: Harper and Row.
14.
Myers-LiptonS. J. (1998). Effect of a comprehensive service-learning program on college students’ civic responsibility.Teaching Sociology, 26(Oct.): 243–258.
15.
National Computer Systems, Inc. (1994). General Purpose Mark Reflex® NCS™ answer sheet.Lawrence, Kansas.
16.
OlsonE. C., BowmanM. L., & RothR. E. (1984). Interpretation and nonformal environmental education in natural resources management.Journal of Environmental Education, 15 (4): 6–10.
17.
Parker-GwinR., & MabryJ. B. (1998). Service learning as pedagogy and civic education: comparing outcomes for three models.Teaching Sociology, 26(Oct.): 276–291.
18.
PeaseJ. L., & AplinD. (1995). Project Bluestem (1st ed.). Neal Smith National Wildlife Refuge-Prairie Learning Center. (Available from the Neal Smith National Wildlife Refuge-Prairie Learning Center, PO Box, Prairie City, IA 50)
19.
RyanC. (1991). The effect of a conservation program on schoolchildren's attitudes toward the environment.Journal of Environmental Education, 22, 30–35.
20.
SAS Institute Inc. (1999). SAS OnlineDoc® (Version 8).Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
21.
ShimekB. (1911). The prairies.State University of Iowa Bulletin (Laboratories of Natural History), 6 (1): 169–240.
22.
StonebergS. A. (1981). The effects of pre-visit, on-site, and post-visit zoo activities upon the cognitive achievement and attitudes of sixth grade pupils (vols. I & II). University of Minnesota.Digital Dissertations, Pub. No. AAT 8211548. 417pp.
23.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (1977). Intergovernmental conference on environmental education final report. Tbilisi, USSR. Paris: UNESCO.
24.
United States Fish and Wildlife Service. (1992). Walnut Creek National Wildlife Refuge and prairie learning center master plan.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service.
