Views of educators and visitors were compared in relation to public enjoyment of a zoological park. Factors studied were the primary motivation, social orientation, and educational strategies associated with zoo visitation. Analysis of variance was used to test for significant differences between groups for each dimension. Results indicated that zoo educators were fairly good at predicting visitors’ educational and recreational motives for attendance, but showed less consistency regarding their social orientation (i.e., intrinsic values were more important to educators). When evaluating the importance of educational strategies, only two out of eight items were similar with visitors. Although educators demonstrated a reasonable understanding of zoo visitors, they were encouraged to become more market-oriented to meet the public's needs.
AndereckK., & CaldwellL. (1994). Motive-based segmentation of a public zoological park market.Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 12, 19–31.
2.
AndersonJ., & BlahnaD. (1996). Is formal visitor research necessary? Assessment of an outdoor museum staff's knowledge of the institution's audience.Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 14 (2), 16–36.
3.
BeerV. (1987). Great expectations: Do museums know what visitors are doing?Curator, 30 (3), 206–215.
4.
BendinerR. (1981). The fall of the wild, the rise of the zoo.New York: E. P. Dutton.
5.
BirneyB. (1986). Comparing exhibit influences on children's knowledge of wildlife as a result of field trips to a zoo versus a natural history museum. In AAZPA Annual Proceedings (pp. 337–389). Silver Spring, MD: American Zoo and Aquarium Association.
BirneyB. (1988b). Criteria for successful museum and zoo visits: Children offer guidance.Curator, 31 (4), 292–316.
8.
BlakelyR. (1981). Formulating an exhibit philosophy In OlneyP.J. S. (Ed.), International zoo yearbook (Vol. 21, pp. 1–5). London: The Zoological Society of London.
9.
BonnerJ. (1989). Formal versus naturalistic evaluation in the museum context. In BitgoodS., BenefieldA., & PattersonD. (Eds.), Visitor studies: Theory, research and practice (Vol. 2, pp. 211–224). Jacksonville, AL: Center for Social Design.
10.
BrodyP. (1981). The LINKS-ZOO: A recreational/educational facility for the future. In OlneyP.J. S. (Ed.), International zoo yearbook (Vol. 21, pp. 63–68). London: The Zoological Society of London.
11.
ClarkR., HendeeJ., & CampbellF. (1971). Values, behavior, and conflict in modern camping culture.Journal of Leisure Research, 3, 143–159.
12.
CromptonJ. (1979). Motivations for pleasure vacation.Annals of Tourism Research, 6, 408–424.
13.
DavisonM. (1989). Information from museum security personnel. In BitgoodS., BenefieldA., & PattersonD. (Eds.), Visitor studies: Theory, research and practice (Vol. 2, pp. 101–106). Jacksonville, AL: Center for Social Design.
14.
De WhiteT. G., & JacobsonS. (1994). Evaluating conservation education programs at a South American zoo.The Journal of Environmental Education, 25 (4), 18–22.
15.
DillmanD. (1978). Mail and telephone surveys: The Total Design Method.New York: John Wiley & Sons.
16.
DolsenD., & MachlisG. (1991). Response rates and mail recreation survey: How much is enough?Journal of Leisure Research, 23, 272–277.
17.
FalkJ., MartinW., & BallingJ. (1978). The novel field-trip phenomenon: Adjustment to novel settings interferes with task learning.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 15 (2), 127–134.
18.
HarrisL. (1995). Recreation in a zoo environment: Applying animal behavior research techniques to understand how visitors allocate time.Legacy, 6 (2), 14–18.
19.
HendeeJ., & HarrisR. (1970). Foresters’ perception of wilderness: User attitudes and preferences.Journal of Forestry, 68 (12), 759–762.
20.
HewsonP. (1992). Market and client satisfaction: Research and management applications. In BitgoodS., BenefieldA., & PattersonD. (Eds.), Visitor studies: Theory, research and practice (Vol. 4, pp. 65–71). Jacksonville, AL: Center for Social Design.
21.
IbitayoO., & VirdenR. (1996). Visitor and manager perceptions of depreciative behaviors in urban park settings.Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 14 (4), 36–51.
22.
KellertS. (1979). Zoological parks in American society. In AAZPA Annual Proceedings (pp. 88–126). Silver Spring, MD: American Zoo and Aquarium Association.
23.
LitvakS. (1969). Attitude change by stimulus exposures.Psychological Reports, 25, 391–396.
24.
MarshdoyleE., BowmanM., & MullinsG. (1982). Evaluating programmatic use of community resource: The zoo.The Journal of Environmental Education, 13 (4), 19–26.
25.
MindickB. (1994). Sights and sounds: The rainforest at Cleveland Metroparks Zoo.Legacy, 5 (4), 9.
26.
MorganJ. M., & HodgkinsonM. (1999). The motivation and social orientation of visitors attending a contemporary zoological park.Environment and Behavior, 31 (2), 227–239.
27.
PetersonG. (1974). A comparison of the sentiments and perceptions of wilderness managers and canoeists in the Boundary Water Canoe Area.Journal of Leisure Research, 6, 194–206.
28.
RhoadsD., & GoldsworthyR. (1979). The effects of zoo environments on public attitudes toward endangered wildlife.International Journal of Environmental Studies, 13, 283–287.
29.
RippeyC. (1990). Cultural programs as an integral part of zoo interpretation.Legacy, 2 (5), 20–22.
30.
RoggenbuckJ., LoomisR., & DagostinoJ. (1990). The learning benefits of leisure.Journal of Leisure Research, 22 (2), 112–124.
31.
RosenthalD., & DriverB. (1983). Managers’ perceptions of experiences sought by ski-tourers.Journal of Forestry, 81 (2), 88–90 & 105.
32.
SerrellB. (1981). The role of zoological parks and aquariums in environmental education.The Journal of Environmental Education, 12, 41–42.
33.
ShawW. (1987). The recreational benefits of wildlife to people. In DeckerD., & GoffG. (Eds.), Valuing wildlife: Economic and social perspectives (pp. 208–213). Boulder, CO: Westview Press, Inc.
34.
SunquistF. (1995). End of the ark?International Wildlife, 25, 23–29.
35.
TwightB., & CattonW. (1975). The politics of images: Forest managers versus recreation publics.Natural Resources journal, 15 (2), 297–306.
36.
WellmanD., DawsonM., & RoggenbuckJ. (1982). Park managers’ predictions of the motivation of visitors to two national park service areas.Journal of Leisure Research, 14 (1), 1–15.
37.
WhiteJ., & MarcelliniD. (1986). HERPLab: A family learning centre at the National Zoological Park. In International zoo yearbook (Vol. 24/25, pp. 340–343). London: The Zoological Society of London.
38.
WolfR., & TymitzB. (1981). Studying visitor perceptions of zoo environments: A naturalistic view. In OlneyP.J. S. (Ed.), International zoo yearbook (Vol. 21, pp. 49–53). London: The Zoological Society of London.
