This article investigates the relationships among property crime, police resources,
and the allocation of police resources in a model using data from Florida jurisdic tions. Crime spillovers among local jurisdictions are also investigated in this
context. Significant spillovers are revealed, and the evidence suggests that allocating scarce police resources to drug enforcement reduces the deterrence of property
crime. The results also suggest that police may capture rents by increasing drug
enforcement. Increasing the relative number of drug arrests raises the property
crime rate, and both of these variables are positively correlated with police
resources.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Avio, K.L., and S.C. Clark.1978. The supply of property offenses in Ontario: Evidence on the deterrent effect of punishment. Canadian Journal of Economics11 (1): 1-19.
2.
Ball, J. Shaffer, and D. Nurco.1983. Day to day criminality of heroin addicts in Baltimore: A study in the continuity of offense rates. Drug and Alcohol Dependence12:119-42.
3.
Becker, Gary.1968. Crime and punishment: An economic approach. Journal of Political Economy78:169-217.
4.
Benson, Bruce L.1990. The enterprise of law: Justice without the state . San Francisco: Pacific Research Institute for Public Policy.
5.
Benson, Bruce L., Iljoong Kim, David W. Rasmussen, and Thomas W. Zuehlke .1992. Is property crime caused by drug use or by drug enforcement policy?Applied Economics24:674-92.
6.
Benson, Bruce L., and David W. Rasmussen .1991. The relationship between illicit drug enforcement policy and property crimes. Contemporary Policy Issues9:106-15.
7.
Block, M.K., and J.M. Heineke.1975. A labor theoretic analysis of the criminal choice. American Economic Review65:314-25.
8.
Blumstein, A., J. Cohen, and D. Nagin, eds. 1978. Deterrence and incapacitation: Estimating the effects of criminal sanctions on crime rates. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
9.
Brenton, Albert, and Ronald Wintrobe .1975. The equilibrium size of a budget maximizing bureau. Journal of Political Economy83:195-207.
10.
Brier, S., and S.E. Fienberg.1980. Recent econometric modelling of crime and punishment: Support for the deterrence hypothesis. Evaluation Review4:147-91.
11.
Buck, Andrew J., Meir Gross, Simon Hakim, and J. Weinblatt.1983. The deterrence hypothesis revisited . Regional Science and Urban Economics13:471-86.
12.
Cameron, Samuel.1988. The economics of crime deterrence: A survey of theory and evidence. Kyklos41:301-23.
13.
Capone, D.C., and W.W. Nichols.1976. Urban structure and criminal mobility . American Behavioral Scientist20:199-213.
14.
Carr-Hill, R.A., and N.H. Stem.1973. Econometric model of the supply and control of recorded offenses in England and Wales. Journal of Public Economics2:289-318.
15.
Chaiken, Jan M., and Marcia R. Chaiken. 1990. Drugs and predatory crime. In Drugs and crime, edited by Michael Tonry and James Q. Wilson.Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
16.
Clotfelter, C.T.1977. Public services, private substitutes, and the demand for protection against crime. American Economic Review67:867-77.
17.
Cook, Philip J.1986. The demand and supply of criminal opportunities . In Crime and justice: An annual review of research, vol. 7, edited by Michael Tonry and Norval Morris.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18.
Craig, S.1987. The deterrent impact of police: An examination of a locally provided public service. Journal of Urban Economics21:298-311.
19.
Ehrlich, Issac.1973. Participation in illegitimate activities: A theoretical and empirical investigation. Journal of Political Economy81:521-65.
20.
—. 1975. The deterrent effect of capital punishment: A question of life and death. American Economic Review65:397-417.
21.
Elliot, Nicholas.1977. Economic analysis of crime and the criminal justice system . In Public law and public policy, edited by John Gardiner.New York: Praeger.
22.
Fabrikant, Richard.1981. Police allocation in the presence of crime spillover . In Crime spillover, edited by Simon Hakim and George F. Rengert.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
23.
Fagan, Jeffrey.1990. Intoxication and aggression. In Drugs and crime, edited by M. Tonry and J. Q. Wilson.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24.
Friedman, Joseph, Simon Hakim, and J. Weinblatt.1989. Casino gambling as a "growth pole" strategy and its effects on crime. Journal of Regional Science29 (4): 615-24.
25.
Furlong, W.J., and S.L. Mehay.1981. Urban law enforcement in Canada: An empirical analysis. Canadian Journal of Economics14:44-57.
26.
Gandossy, R.P., J.R. Williams, J. Cohen, and H.J. Harwood.1980. Drugs and crime: A survey and analysis of the literature. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
27.
Gill, Andrew M., and Robert J. Michaels .1990. Drug use and earnings: Accounting for the selection of drug users. Working paper no. 11-90. Fullerton: California State University, Department of Economics.
28.
Gottfredson, Michael R., and Travis Hirschi.1990. A general theory of crimeStanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
29.
Greenberg, S.W., and F. Alder.1974. Crime and addiction: An empirical analysis of the literature, 1920-1973. Contemporary Drug Problems3: 1-27.
30.
Gropper, Bernard.1985. Probing the links between drugs and crime. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice .
31.
Hakim, Simon.1980. The attraction of property crimes to suburban localities: A revised economic model. Urban Studies17:265-76.
32.
Hakim, Simon, Arie Ovadia, Eli Sagi, and J. Weinblatt.1979. Interjurisdictional spillover of crime and police expenditure. Land Economics55:200-12.
33.
Hakim, S., U. Spiegal, and J. Weinblatt.1984. Substitution, size effects and the composition of crime. Social Science Quarterly65:719-34.
34.
Hoenack, Stephen, and William Weiler.1980. A structural model of murder behavior and the criminal justice system. American Economic Review70:327-41.
35.
Hoffman, Peter, and James Beck.1985. Recidivism among released federal prisoners . Criminal Justice and Behavior12 (4): 501-507.
36.
Johnson, B., P. Goldstein, E. Preble, J. Schmeidler, D. Lipton, B. Spunt, and T. Miller.1985. Taking care of business: The economics of crime by heroin abusers. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
37.
Kaestner, Robert.1991. The effects of illicit drug use on the wages of young adults. Journal of Labor Economics9 (4): 381-412.
38.
Kennett, David.1982. Standards and procedures for the distribution of a public service: Shoup revisited. Public Finance37 (1): 80-97.
39.
Kmenta, Jan.1986. Elements of econometrics. 2d ed. New York: Macmillan.
40.
Mathieson, D., and P. Passell.1976. Homicide and robbery in New York City: An economic model. Journal of Legal Studies6:83-98.
41.
McIver, John P.1981. Criminal mobility: A review of empirical studies. In Crime spillover, edited by Simon Hakim and George F. Rengert, 48-53. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
42.
Mehay, Stephen L.1977. Interjurisdictional spillovers of urban police services . Southern Economic Journal43:1352-59.
43.
—. 1981. Burglary spillover in Los Angeles. In Crime spillover, edited by Simon Hakim and George F. Rengert, 67-82. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
44.
Mueller, Dennis C.1989. Public choice II: A revised edition of public choice . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45.
Myers, Samuel L.1980. Why are crimes underreported? What is the crime? Does it really matter?Social Science Quarterly61 (1): 23-43.
46.
Niskanen, William.1975. Bureaucrats and politicians. Journal of Law and Economics18:617-43.
47.
O'Neil, J., and E. Wish.1989. Drug use forecasting (DUF) research update. In Research in action. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
48.
Pope, C.E.1980. Patterns in burglary: An empirical examination of offenses and offender characteristics. Journal of Criminal Justice8 (1): 39-51.
49.
Purdum, Elizabeth D., and James R. Anderson, eds. 1988. Florida county atlas and municipal fact book. Tallahassee: Florida State University, Institute of Science and Public Affairs .
50.
Pyle, David J.1983. The economics of crime and law enforcement. London: Macmillan.
51.
Rasmussen, David W., Bruce L. Benson, Iljoong Kim, and Thomas Zuehlke.1990. An economic analysis of drug crime in Florida. Report prepared under contract with the Joint Legislative Management Committee of the Florida Legislature.
52.
Reppetto, Thomas A.1976. Crime prevention and the displacement phenomenon . Crime and Delinquency22 (2): 166-67.
53.
Reuter, Peter, R. MacCoun, and P. Murphy.1990. Money from crime: A study of the economics of drug dealing in Washington, D.C. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
54.
Silver, S.1974. Punishment, deterrence, and police effectiveness: A survey and critical interpretation of recent econometric literature. New York: Crime Deterrence and Offender Career Project .
55.
Sjoquist, David.1973. Property crime and economic behavior: Some empirical results . American Economic Review83:439-46.
56.
Sollars, David L., Bruce L. Benson, and David W. Rasmussen .1990. Interjurisdictional effects of drug enforcement in Florida. Report prepared under contract with the Joint Legislative Management Committee of the Florida Legislature.
57.
Toma, Mark, and Eugenia Froedge Toma.1980. Bureaucratic responses to tax limitation amendments. Public Choice35:333-48.
58.
Trager, Kenneth, and Michael Clark.1989. Florida drug offender profile. Florida Department of Law Enforcement, Statistical Analysis Center.
59.
U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.1992. Criminal victimization in the United States, 1990. NCJ report 134126. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
60.
Wilson, James Q., and Richard J. Herrnstein .1985. Crime and human nature: The definitive study of the causes of crime. New York: Simon & Schuster.
