The Distributional Impact of Public Goods

Abstract

Aspects of the method developed by Aaron and McGuire and Maital (AMM) for estimating the benefit distributions associated with the provision of pure public goods are clarified and the method is extended to cover the case of public projects designed to improve the quality of impure public goods. The extended method is used to estimate the distributional impact of a proposed public project in the Cleveland-Akron metropolitan region, and the results are compared with estimates obtained from three naive models and from the AMM model for pure public goods. It is found that the native models overestimate substantially the net benefits received by low-income families and underestimate the net benefits received by high-income families. Using the AMM method for a pure public good similarly distorts the results, though by a much smaller magnitude.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aaron

McGuire

(1976) “Reply to Brennan: ‘Public goods and income distribution.’” Econometrica 44: 401–404.

Aaron

McGuire

(1970) “Public goods and income distribution.” Econometrica 38: 907–920.

Brennan

(1976a) “The distributional implications of public goods.” Econometrica 44: 391–399.

Brennan

(1976b) “Public goods and income distribution: A rejoinder to the Aaron-McGuire reply.” Econometrica 44: 405–407.

Buchanan

J. M.

(1968) The Demand and Supply of Public Goods. Chicago: Rand McNally.

Center for Urban Regionalism and Systems Environmental (1973) Evaluation of Wastewater Management Alternatives for the Cleveland-Akron Metropolitan and Three Rivers Watershed Areas. Kent State University.

Fellner

(1967) “Operational utility: The theoretical background and a measurement,” in Ten Economic Studies in the Tradition of Irving Fisher. New York: John Wiley.

Freeman

Iii (1975) “A survey of the techniques for measuring the benefits of water quality improvement,” in Peskin

H. M.

Seskin

E. P.

(eds.) Cost Benefit Analysis and Water Pollution Policy. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.

Herriot

Miller

(1972) “Tax changes among income groups 1962–1968.” Business Horizons 15: 41–50.

10.

Lindahl

(1958) “Just taxation—a positive solution,” in Musgrave

R. A.

Peacock

A. T.

(eds.) Classics in the Theory of Public Finance. New York: MacMillan.

11.

McGuire

Aaron

(1969) “Efficiency and equity in the optimal supply of a public good.” Rev. of Economics and Statistics 51: 31–39.

12.

Maital

(1975) “Apportionment of public goods benefits to individuals.” Public Finance 30: 397–413.

13.

Maital

(1973) “Public goods and income distribution: Some further results.” Econometrica 41: 561–568.

14.

Mishan

E. J.

(1971) Cost Benefit Analysis: An Introduction. New York: Praeger.

15.

Powell

A. A.

Van Hoa

Wilson

R. H.

(1968) “A multi-sectoral analysis of consumer demand in the post-war period.” Southern Economic J. 35: 109–120.

16.

Tucker

R. S.

(1953) “The distribution of government burdens and benefits.” Amer. Economic Rev. 48: 519–534.

17.

U.S. Bureau of the Census (1972) Census of Population 1970 Detailed Characteristics Final Report PC (1)-D37 Ohio. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

18.

U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Outdoor Recreation (1972) The 1970 Survey of Outdoor Recreation Activities, Preliminary Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

19.

Weisbrod

(1964) “Collective-consumption services of individual-consumption goods.” Q. J. of Economics 78: 471–477.

20.

Willig

R. D.

(1976) “Consumers surplus without apology.” Amer. Economic Rev. 66: 589–597.

21.

Wright-McLaughlin Engineers (1973) U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Cleveland-Akron Three Rivers Watershed Wastewater Management Survey Scope Study, Formulation Final Report.