In this study, we examine how ordinary taxes and earmarked taxes influence tax pass-through in a market experiment. We hypothesize that tax pass-through is lower for earmarked taxes than for ordinary taxes and that this difference depends on market conditions, specifically the balance between the trade surpluses for sellers and buyers. Our findings confirm that ordinary taxes result in full tax pass-through, whereas earmarked taxes result in less pass-through. Under earmarked taxes, sellers adjust the level of pass-through based on their trade surplus relative to the buyers’ trade surplus. These results underscore the need to distinguish between tax types. The results of our study provide novel insights into the resource allocation effects of different tax types, offering significant implications for policymakers seeking to regulate goods with externalities through taxation.
AlmJamesSchulzeWilliam D.von BoseCarrieYanJubo. 2019. “Appeals to Social Norms and Taxpayer Compliance.” Southern Economic Journal86 (2): 638–666. https://doi.org/10.1002/soej.12374
2.
AndreoniJames.1988. “Why Free Ride?” Journal of Public Economics37: 291–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(88)90043-6
3.
AndreoniJames.1989. “Giving with Impure Altruism: Applications to Charity and Ricardian Equivalence.” Journal of Political Economy97 (6): 1447–1458. https://doi.org/10.1086/261662
4.
AndreoniJamesPetrieRagan. 2004. “Public Goods Experiments Without Confidentiality: A Glimpse into Fund-Raising.” Journal of Public Economics88: 1605–1623. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(03)00040-9
5.
BesleyTimothy J.RosenHarvey S.. 1999. “Sales Taxes and Prices: An Empirical Analysis.” National Tax Journal52 (2): 157–178. https://doi.org/10.3386/w6667
6.
BoltonGary E.OckenfelsAxel. 2000. “A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity, and Competition.” American Economic Review90 (1): 166–193. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.90.1.166
7.
CarbonnierClement.2007. “Who Pays Sales Taxes? Evidence from French VAT Reforms,1987–1999.” Journal of Public Economics91: 1219–1229.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2006.12.004
8.
CoxJames C.RiderMarkSenAstha. 2018. “Tax Incidence: Do Institutions Matter? An Experimental Study.” Public Finance Review46 (6): 899–925. https://doi.org/10.1177/1091142117700720
9.
DelipallaSophiaO’DonnellOwen. 2001. “Estimating tax incidence, Market Power and Market Conduct: The European Cigarette Industry.” International Journal of Industrial Organization19 (6): 885–908. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7187(99)00057-0
10.
DjanaliIwanSheehan-ConnorDamien. 2012. “Tax Affinity Hypothesis: Do we Really Hate Paying Taxes?” Journal of Economic Psychology33 (4): 758–775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2012.02.004
HeckmanJames J.1979. “Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error.” Econometrica47 (1): 153–161. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912352
13.
KallbekkenSteffenKrollStephanCherryTodd L.. 2011. “Do you not Like Pigou, or Do you not Understand him? Tax Aversion and Revenue Recycling in the lab.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management62 (1): 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2010.10.006
14.
LandryCraig E.LangeAndreasListJohn A.PriceMichael K.RuppNicholas G.. 2010. “Is a Donor in Hand Better Than two in the Bush? Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment.” American Economic Review100 (3): 958–983. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.3.958
15.
ListJohn A.2004. “Testing Neoclassical Competitive Theory in Multilateral Decentralized Markets.” Journal of Political Economy112 (5): 1131–1156. https://doi.org/10.1086/422564
16.
MarionJustinMuehleggerErich. 2011. “Fuel tax incidence and Supply Conditions.” Journal of Public Economics95 (9): 1202–1212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.04.003
17.
MylesGareth D.1995. “Imperfect Competition and Industry-Specific Input Taxes.” Public Finance Quarterly23 (3): 336–355. https://doi.org/10.1177/109114219502300303
18.
PoterbaJames M.1996. “Retail Price Reactions to Changes in State and Local Sales Taxes.” National Tax Journal49 (2): 165–176. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41789195
19.
RoodmanDavidØrregaard NielsenMortenMacKinnonJames G.WebbMatthew D.. 2019. “Fast and Wild: Bootstrap Inference in Stata Using Boottest.” The Stata Journal19 (1): 4–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X19830877
20.
RossJustin M., and Lozano-RojasFelipe. 2018. Consumer incidence in sales tax holidays: Evidence from Tennessee. Chicago Booth Kilts Center Working Paper.
21.
SmithVernon L.1962. “An Experimental Study of Competitive Market Behavior.” Journal of Political Economy70: 111–137. https://doi.org/10.1086/258609
22.
SmithVernon L.1976. “Experimental Economics: Induced Value Theory.” American Economic Review66 (2): 274–279. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1817233
23.
SmithVernon L.WilliamsArlington W.. 1982. “The Effects of Rent Asymmetries in Experimental Auction Markets.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization3 (1): 99–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(82)90006-3
24.
WenzelMichael. 2005. “Misperceptions of Social Norms About Tax Compliance: From Theory to Intervention.” Journal of Economic Psychology26: 862–883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2005.02.002
