This study examines the time to adoption of municipal local option sales taxes (LOSTs) in Texas from 1967 to 2012. General-purpose LOSTs were introduced in 1968 and were the only LOSTs available to local governments until 1988, when four earmarked LOSTs were permitted for municipalities. Counties and special districts were also allowed to adopt LOSTs beginning in 1988. Using a Cox proportional hazard model and a variation that allows for repeating events, this study finds that proximity to major highways and state and national borders and LOST rates within and around a municipality affect time to adoption.
AfonsoWhitneyMurphyMargaretTobinTommy. 2016. LOSTs in Detail: A Comparison of North Carolina’s Local Option Sales Tax Policy with Those of Other States. Chapel Hill: School of Government, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
2.
AndersonNathan B.2006. “Property Tax Limitations: An Interpretative Review.” National Tax Journal59:685–94.
3.
BerryFrances StokesBerryWilliam D., 2014. “Innovation and Diffusion Models in Policy Research.” In Theories of the Policy Process, edited by SabatierPaul A., vol. 3, 307–62. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
4.
BowmanJohnMacManusSusanMikesellJohn. 1992. “Mobilizing Resources for Public Services: Financing Urban Governments.” Journal of Urban Affairs14:311–35.
5.
Box-SteffensmeierJanet M.JonesBradford S.. 2004. Event History Modeling: A Guide for Social Scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.
6.
Box-SteffensmeierJanet M.ZornChristopher J. W.. 2002. “Duration Models for Repeated Events.” Journal of Politics64:1069–94.
7.
BrunoriDavid, 2007. Local Tax Policy: A Federalist Perspective. vol. 2. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
8.
BuchananJames M.1963. “The Economics of Earmarked Taxes.” The Journal of Political Economy71:457–69.
9.
BurgeGregory S.PiperBrian. 2012. “Strategic Fiscal Interdependence: County and Municipal Adoptions of Local Option Sales Taxes.” National Tax Journal65:387–416.
10.
BurgeGregory S.RogersCynthia L.. 2011. “Local Option Sales Taxes and Consumer Spending Patterns: Fiscal Interdependence under Multi-tiered Local Taxation.” Regional Science and Urban Economics41:46–58.
11.
BurgeGregory S.RogersCynthia L.. 2016. “Leaders, Followers, and Asymmetric Local Tax Policy Diffusion.” Journal of Regional Science56:313–31.
CollettDavid. 1994. Modelling Survival Data in Medical Research. London, UK: Chapman and Hall.
15.
CoxDavid Roxbee. 1972. “Regression Models and Life-tables.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Methodological)34:187–220.
16.
CrowleyGeorgeHofferAdam. 2012. “Dedicating Tax Revenue: Constraining Government or Masking Its Growth?” Mercatus Center at George Mason University Working Paper, Arlington, VA.
17.
DoyleWilliam R.2006. “Adoption of Merit-based Student Grant Programs: An Event History Analysis.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis28:259–85.
18.
DyeThomas. 1990. American Federalism: Competition among Governments. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
19.
JonesBradford S.BrantonRegina P.. 2005. “Beyond Logit and Probit: Cox Duration Models of Single, Repeating, and Competing Events for State Policy Adoption.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly5:420–43.
20.
JungChanghoon. 2001. “Does the Local-option Sales Tax Provide Property Tax Relief? The Georgia Case.” Public Budgeting & Finance21:73–86.
21.
JusticeJohnathan B.MelitskiJamesSmithDaniel L.. 2006. “E-Government as an Instrument of Fiscal Accountability and Responsiveness: Do the Best Practitioners Employ the Best Practices?” The American Review of Public Administration36:301–22.
22.
KanburRaviKeenMichael. 1993. “Jeux Sans Frontières: Tax Competition and Tax Coordination When Countries Differ in Size.” American Economic Review83:877–92.
23.
LunaLeAnn. 2004. “Local Sales Tax Competition and the Effect on County Governments’ Tax Rates and Tax Bases.” Journal of the American Taxation Association26:43–61.
24.
LunaLeAnnBruceDonaldHawkinsRichard. 2007. “Maxing Out: An Analysis of Local Option Sales Tax Rate Increases.” National Tax Journal60:45–63.
25.
MillerChad R.BrianRichard. 2010. “The Policy Diffusion of the State R&D Investment Tax Credit.” State and Local Government Review42:22–35.
26.
Office of the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts. 2014. Local Sales and Use Tax. Austin: Office of the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts.
27.
PajariRoger. 1984. “Georgia’s Local Option Sales Tax: Who Adopts It and Why?” Southeastern Political Review12:127–53.
28.
RogersCynthia L.2004. “Local Option Sales Tax (LOST) Policy on the Urban Fringe.” Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy34:25–50.
29.
RorkJonathan C.2003. “Coveting Thy Neighbors’ Taxation.” National Tax Journal56:775–87.
30.
SjoquistDavid L.SmithWilliam J.WalkerMary BethWallaceSally. 2007. “An Analysis of the Time to Adoption of Local Sales Taxes: A Duration Model Approach.” Public Budgeting & Finance27:20–40.
31.
Stata. 2011. Stata Survival Analysis and Epidemiological Tables Reference Manual Release 12. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
32.
U.S. Census Bureau. 2010. Decennial Census, U.S. Census Bureau. Suitland, MD: U.S. Census Bureau.
33.
WildasinDavid, 1987. “The Demand for Public Goods in the Presence of Tax Exporting.” National Tax Journal40:591–601.
34.
ZhaoZhirong. 2005. “Motivations, Obstacles, and Resources: The Adoption of the General Purpose Local Option Sales Tax in Georgia Counties.” Public Finance Review33:721–46.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
