Property taxes have been a contentious issue in North Dakota for decades. Property tax relief implemented in 2009 gave local governments a grant of state funds to compensate for lost revenues from reductions in property tax rates. Additional relief in 2013 simultaneously reduced property tax rates alongside changes to the model used to determine the state contribution to local K-12 education. From 2005 to 2018, the average per-pupil expenditure on K-12 education in North Dakota nearly doubled. We argue that property tax relief shifted the funding burden from the local property tax towards dependency on state funds creating increased complexity in the tax system and leading to fiscal illusion. The consequence of the fiscal illusion was an unintended increase in education expenditures. We test this hypothesis econometrically using panel data at the county and school district level in North Dakota. We find evidence that supports the fiscal illusion hypothesis.
BroxtermanD. A.LarsonW. D.. 2020. “An Empirical Examination of Shift-Share Instruments.” Journal of Regional Science60 (4): 677–711. https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12481
4.
BuchananJ. M.. 1967. Public Finance in Democratic Process: Fiscal Institutions and Individual Choice. Chapel Hill, NC, USA: UNC Press Books.
5.
BuchananJ. M.WagnerR. E.. 1977. Democracy in Deficit. New York, NY, USA: New York Academic Press.
6.
CardD.PayneA. A.. 2002. “School Finance Reform, the Distribution of School Spending, and the Distribution of Student Test Scores.” Journal of Public Economics83 (1): 49–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0047-2727(00)00177-8.
7.
CourantP.GramlichE.RubinfeldD.. 1979. “The Stimulative Effects of Lntergovernmental Grants: Or Why Money Sticks Where It Hits.” In Fiscal Federalism and Grants-in-Aid, edited by MieszkowskiPeterOaklandWilliam, 5–21. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
8.
DolleryB.WorthingtonA.. 1995. “Federal Expenditure and Fiscal Illusion: A Test of the Flypaper Hypothesis in Australia.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism25 (1): 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubjof.a038178
EomT. H.RubensteinR.. 2006. “Do State-Funded Property Tax Exemptions Increase Local Government Inefficiency? An Analysis of New York State's STAR Program.” Public Budgeting & Finance26 (1): 66–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5850.2006.00839.x
Goldsmith-PinkhamP.SorkinI.SwiftH.. 2020. “Bartik Instruments: What, When, why, and how.” American Economic Review110 (8): 2586–2624. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20181047
13.
GramlichE. M.GalperH.GoldfeldS.McGuireM.. 1973. “State and Local Fiscal Behavior and Federal Grant Policy.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity1973 (1): 15–65. https://doi.org/10.2307/2534084
14.
GrossmanP. J.1990. “The Impact of Federal and State Grants on Local Government Spending: A Test of the Fiscal Illusion Hypothesis.” Public Finance Quarterly18 (3): 313–327. https://doi.org/10.1177/109114219001800304.
15.
HanushekE. A.Joyce-WirtzM.. 2023. “Incidence and Outcomes of School Finance Litigation: 1968–2021.” Public Finance Review51 (6): 748–781. https://doi.org/10.1177/1091142123119096
JacksonC. K.JohnsonR.PersicoC.. 2014. “The Effect of School Finance Reforms on The Distribution of Spending, Academic Achievement, and Adult Outcomes (No. w20118).” National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w20118.
LoganR. R.1986. “Fiscal Illusion and the Grantor Government.” Journal of Political Economy94 (6): 1304–1318. https://doi.org/10.1086/261434.
20.
LutzB.2010. “Taxation with Representation: Intergovernmental Grants in a Plebiscite Democracy.” Review of Economics and Statistics92 (2): 316–332. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.2010.12258.
21.
MegdalS. B.1983. “Equalization of Expenditures and the Demand for Local Public Education: The Case of New Jersey.” Public Finance Quarterly11 (3): 365–376. https://doi.org/10.1177/109114218301100306.
22.
MitiasP. M.TurnbullG. K.. 2001. “Grant Illusion, tax Illusion, and Local Government Spending.” Public Finance Review29 (5): 347–368. https://doi.org/10.1177/109114210102900501
23.
MurrayS.EvansW.SchwabR.. 1998. “Education-Finance Reform and the Distribution of Education Resources.” The American Economic Review88 (4): 789–812.
24.
NicholsK.2021. “The Effect of Property Tax Relief on K-12 Education Expenditures in North Dakota” (Master's thesis, North Dakota State University).
25.
OatesW. E.1979. “Lump-sum Intergovernmental Grants Have Price Effects.” In Fiscal federalism and grants in aid, edited by Peter Mieszkowski and William H. Oakland. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
26.
OatesW. E.1985. “On the Nature and Measurement of Fiscal Illusion: A Survey.” In On The Nature and Measurement of Fiscal Illusion: A Survey (pp. 65-82). College Park, MD: Department of Economics, University of Maryland. https://doi.org/http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.409.4839&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
27.
PogueT. F.1983. “The Incidence of Property tax Relief via State aid to Local Governments.” Land Economics59 (4): 420–431. https://doi.org/10.2307/3145657
28.
PuvianiA.1903. Teoria Della Illusione Finanziaria. Italy: Palermo.
RossJ. M.MughanS.. 2018. “The Effect of Fiscal Illusion on Public Sector Financial Management: Evidence from Local Government Property Assessment.” Public Finance Review46 (4): 635–664. https://doi.org/10.1177/1091142116676360
SjoquistD. L.1982. “The Effect of the Number of Local Governments on Central City Expenditures.” National Tax Journal35 (1): 79–87. https://doi.org/10.1086/ntj41862421.
33.
TurnbullG. K.1998. “The Overspending and Flypaper Effects of Fiscal Illusion: Theory and Empirical Evidence.” Journal of Urban Economics44 (1): 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1006/juec.1997.2056.
34.
WagnerR. E.1976. “Revenue Structure, Fiscal Illusion, and Budgetary Choice.” Public Choice25: 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01726330.
35.
WinerS. L.1983. “Some Evidence on the Effect of the Separation of Spending and Taxing Decisions.” Journal of Political Economy91 (1): 126–140. https://doi.org/10.1086/261131.
36.
ZhaoZ.JungC.. 2008. “Does Earmarked Revenue Provide Property Tax Relief? Long-Term Budgetary Effects of Georgia's Local Option Sales Tax.” Public Budgeting & Finance28 (4): 52–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5850.2008.00916.x.
