Local governments in Georgia have been authorized since the 1970s to levy a 1 percent general-purpose Local Option Sales Tax (LOST), which is earmarked for property tax relief. Using data during 1975 to 2002, this study examines the adoption of the LOST through a discrete-time event history analysis. The dependent variable is the probability that an eligible county will adopt it in a particular year. This probability is negatively related to the obstacles prohibiting the innovation and positively related to (1) the motivations to innovate and (2) the resources for overcoming the obstacles. The findings suggest that the motivations are higher in counties with higher property tax millage rates and the potential of sales tax exportation; the obstacles include high existing sales tax rates and severe tax competition; and the major resource for overcoming these obstacles is the adoption of the LOST in other Georgia counties.
Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations. 1994. Changing public attitudes on governments and taxes. Reports S-1 to S-23. Washington, DC: Advisory Commission on Inter-governmental Relations.
2.
Allen, Russ, and Jill Clark. 1981. State policy adoption and innovation: Lobbying and education.State and Local Government Review13:18-25.
3.
Alm, James, Michael McKee, and Mark Skidmore. 1993. Fiscal pressure, tax competition, and the introduction of state lotteries. National Tax Journal46 (4): 463-476.
4.
Association County Commissioners of Georgia. 2002. 2000-2002: Renegotiation of the local option sales tax revenue distribution certificate. Atlanta, GA: Association County Commissioners of George.
5.
Bachtel, Douglas C., and Susan R. Boatright, eds. 1982-2003. The Georgia county guide. Athens: Center for Agribusiness and Economic Development, University of Georgia.
6.
Bergstrom, Theodore C., and Robert P. Goodman. 1973. Private demands for public goods. American Economic Review63 (3): 157-177.
7.
Berry, Frances Stokes, and William D. Berry. 1990. State lottery adoption as policy innovation: An event history analysis. American Political Science Review84 (2): 395-415.
8.
Besley, Timothy, and Anne Case. 1995. Incumbent behavior: Vote seeking, tax setting and yardstick competition. American Economic Review85 (1): 25-45.
9.
Black, Duncan, R. A. Newing, Iain McLean, Alistair McMillan, and Burt L. Monroe. 1998. The theory of committees and elections. Rev. 2nd ed.Boston: Kluwer Academic.
10.
Blackley, Paul R., and Larry DeBoer. 1987. Tax base choice by local governments. In Land economics, vol. 63, 227. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
11.
Blair, Diane, and Robert L. Savage. 1981. Abortion policies in the fifty states: A current case of pluralistic responsiveness. Southeastern Political Review9:34-55.
12.
Blomquist, William. 1999. The policy process and large-N comparative studies. In Theories of the policy process, ed. P. A. Sabatier, viii, 289. Boulder, CO: Westview.
13.
Boyne, George A.1998. Party competition and local spending decisions. British Journal of Political Science28 (1): 210-222.
14.
Case, Anne C., Harvey S. Rosen, and James R. Hines Jr.1993. Budget spillovers and fiscal policy interdependence: Evidence from the states. Journal of Public Economics52:287-307.
15.
Chelf, Carl P.1984. Public policymaking in America. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
16.
Chicoine, David L., and Norman Walzer. 1986. Factors affecting property tax reliance. Public Choice49 (1): 17-28.
17.
Clarke, Susan E. 1977. Growing and learning: The incidence of state growth management innovations. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, November, New Orleans, LA.
18.
Clements, Betty J., and J. Devereux Weeks. 1997. County and municipal revenue sources in Georgia. Athens, GA: Carl Vinson Institute of Government.
19.
Durning, Danny W.1992. Distributing Georgia’s general-purpose local-option sales tax revenues: An examination of the present policy and some options. Athens, GA: Carl Vinson Institute of Government, University of Georgia.
20.
Dye, Thomas R.1966. Politics, economics, and the public: Policy outcomes in the American states. Chicago: Rand McNally.
21.
Dye, Thomas R.1966. 1967. Governmental structures, urban environment and educational policy. Midwest Journal of Political Science11:353-380.
22.
Dye, Thomas R.1966. 1990. The policy consequences of intergovernmental competition. Cato Journal10 (1): 59-73.
23.
Dye, Thomas R., and Dorothy K. Davidson. 1981. State energy policies: Federal funds for paper programs. Policy Studies Review1 (2): 255-262.
24.
Elling, Richard C.1979. State party platforms and state legislative performance: A comparative analysis. American Journal of Political Science23 (2): 383-405.
25.
Foster, John L.1978. Regionalism and innovation in the American states. Journal of Politics40:179-187.
26.
Furlong, Edward J.1998. A logistic regression model explaining recent state casino gaming adoptions. Policy Studies Journal26 (3): 371-383.
27.
Georgia Department of Revenue. 1996. A tax guide for Georgia citizens. Atlanta: Georgia Department of Revenue.
28.
Georgia Department of Revenue. 2004. History rate chart. Atlanta: Georgia Department of Revenue.
Gray, Virginia. 1973. Innovation in the states: A diffusion study. American Political Science Review67 (4): 1174-1185.
31.
Hettich, Walter, and Stanley L. Winer. 1988. Economic and political foundations of tax structure.American Economic Review78:701-712.
32.
Heyndels, Bruno, and Jef Vuchelen. 1998. Tax mimicking among Belgian municipalities. National Tax Journal51:89-101.
33.
Hofferbert, Richard I.1974. The study of public policy. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
34.
Hosmer, David W., and Stanley Lemeshow. 1989. Applied logistic regression. New York: John Wiley.
35.
Jung, Changhoon. 2001. Does the local-option sales tax provide property tax relief? The Georgia case. Public Budgeting and Finance21 (1): 73-86.
36.
King, Gary, Michael Tomz, and Jason Wittenberg. 2000. Making the most of statistical analyses: Improving interpretation and presentation. American Journal of Political Science44 (2): 346-361.
37.
Kingdon, John W.1984. Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. New York: HarperCollins.
38.
Krmenec, Andrew J.1991. Sales tax as property tax relief? The shifting onus of local revenue generation. The Professional Geographer43 (1): 60-67.
39.
Ladd, Helen F.1992. Mimicking of local tax burden among neighboring counties. Public Finance Quarterly20 (4): 450-467.
40.
Long, J. Scott. 1997. Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
41.
Maxwell, James Ackley. 1965. Financing state and local governments. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
42.
McGuire, Therese J.2001. Alternatives to property taxation for local government. In Property tax and local government finance, ed. W. E. Oates. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
Mohr, L. B.1969. Determinants of innovation in organizations. American Political Science Review63:111-126.
45.
Mooney, Christopher Z., and Mei-Hsien Lee. 1995. Legislating morality in the American states: The case of pre-Roeabortion regulation reform. American Journal of Political Science39:599-599.
46.
Mueller, Keith, and John Comer. 1983. Disinnovation in the American states: Policy toward health systems agencies. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare10:189-202.
47.
Nice, David C.1987. State party ideology and policy making. Policy Studies Journal13:780-796.
48.
Norstrand, Rolf. 1980. The choice between income tax and land tax in Danish municipalities.Public Finance35 (3): 412-424.
49.
Oates, Wallace E.2001. Property tax and local government finance: An overview and some reflections. In Property tax and local government finance. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
50.
Pajari, Roger N.1984. Georgia’s local option sales tax: Who adopts it and why?Southeastern Political Review12:127-153.
51.
Poterba, James M.1995. Capital budgets, borrowing rules, and state capital spending. Journal of Public Economics56 (2): 165-187.
Santerre, Rexford E.1986. Representative versus direct democracy: A Tiebout test of relative performance. Public Choice48 (1): 55-63.
54.
Savage, Robert L.1978. Policy innovativeness as a trait of American states. Journal of Politics40 (1): 212-224.
55.
Savage, Robert L.1985. Diffusion research traditions and the spread of policy innovations in a federal system. Publius—The Journal of Federalism15:1-11.
56.
Schneider, Mark. 1989. The competitive city: The political economy of suburbia. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
57.
Shadbegian, Ronald J.1999. The effect of tax and expenditure limitations on the revenue structure of local government, 1962-87. National Tax Journal52:221-238.
58.
Sharkansky, Ira. 1970. Policy analysis in political science. Chicago: Markham.
59.
Shuford, Gordon, and Richard Young. 2000. A report on local government funding: An overview of national issues and trends. Manuscript.
60.
Singer, Jerry A.1987. The special 1% sales tax referendum: Tips and techniques on municipal participation. Urban Georgia37:9-13.
61.
Skidmore, Mark. 1999. Tax and expenditure limitations and the fiscal relationships between state and local governments. Public Choice99 (1-2): 77-102.
62.
Temple, Judy A.1996. Community composition and voter support for tax limitations: Evidence from home-rule elections. Southern Economic Journal62:1002-1016.
63.
Tiebout, Charles M.1956. A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy64 (5): 416-424.
64.
Tullock, Gordon. 1967. Politics, economics, and the public [Book review]. Journal of Business40:539-539.
65.
Tuma, Nancy Brandon, and Michael T. Hannan. 1984. Social dynamics: Models and methods.Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
66.
Ulbrich, Holley H. 1996. Local option sales taxes and municipal finance in South Carolina: A look at the first few years. Prepared for the Municipal Association of South Carolina, Columbia.
67.
Walker, Jack L.1969. The diffusion of innovations among the American states. American Political Science Review63:880-889.
68.
Wisconsin Taxpayers Alliance. 2002. Do county sales taxes lower property taxes?Vol. 70. Madison: Wisconsin Taxpayers Alliance.
69.
Wohlenberg, Ernest H.1980. Correlates of Equal Rights Amendment ratification. Social Science Quarterly60:676-684.
